Auftrag von Robert Gurdon
Gesendet: Montag, 7. Oktober 2013 16:15
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: [Samba] Failover
Hi guys,
I have a domain with Samba 4.0.5 domain controllers and also a failover DRBD
shared disk, where the active DC controlls the access to the disk.
DOMAINC01 - 10.48.16.150
---
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
Im
Auftrag von Robert Gurdon
Gesendet: Montag, 7. Oktober 2013 16:15
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: [Samba] Failover
Hi guys,
I have a domain with Samba 4.0.5
Hi guys,
I have a domain with Samba 4.0.5 domain controllers and also a failover
DRBD shared disk, where the active DC controlls the access to the disk.
DOMAINC01 - 10.48.16.150
DOMAINC02 - 10.48.16.151
DOMAINCHA - 10.48.16.155 this would be the failover IP, which works
perfectly on Windows XP
Hi guys,
I have a domain with Samba 4.0.5 domain controllers and also a failover
DRBD shared disk, where the active DC controlls the access to the disk.
DOMAINC01 - 10.48.16.150
DOMAINC02 - 10.48.16.151
DOMAINCHA - 10.48.16.155 this would be the failover IP, which works
perfectly on Windows XP
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 15:36 +0200, Sandbox wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a domain with Samba 4.0.5 domain controllers and also a failover
DRBD shared disk, where the active DC controlls the access to the disk.
DOMAINC01 - 10.48.16.150
DOMAINC02 - 10.48.16.151
DOMAINCHA - 10.48.16.155 this
2013-10-07 21:11 keltezéssel, Andrew Bartlett írta:
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 15:36 +0200, Sandbox wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a domain with Samba 4.0.5 domain controllers and also a failover
DRBD shared disk, where the active DC controlls the access to the disk.
DOMAINC01 - 10.48.16.150
DOMAINC02 -
Hi,
I have a failover configuration.
The domain controller's IP: 10.23.14.150 as dc01
The failover IP is: 10.23.14.155 as dcha
I added an A and a CNAME record to the dns for the failover IP.
It is working, i can see the shares, but I could not enter to any share as
user, as Administrator it
On 2/28/2011 at 09:21 PM, Caspar Smit c.s...@truebit.nl wrote:
Hi,
I have two machines in a cluster and want to create a high available samba
share that connects to active directory for user information. The storage is
DRBD and the filesystem is XFS.
I'm using pacemaker as cluster
On 2/28/2011 at 10:39 PM, Tim Serong tser...@novell.com wrote:
On 2/28/2011 at 09:21 PM, Caspar Smit c.s...@truebit.nl wrote:
Hi,
I have two machines in a cluster and want to create a high available samba
share that connects to active directory for user information. The
Hi,
I have two machines in a cluster and want to create a high available samba
share that connects to active directory for user information. The storage is
DRBD and the filesystem is XFS.
I'm using pacemaker as cluster software and using the lsb:samba init script.
I connected both machines to
Tim,
Thank you very much for this, I will check out the manpage and wiki page.
Kind regards,
Caspar Smit
2011/2/28 Tim Serong tser...@novell.com
On 2/28/2011 at 09:21 PM, Caspar Smit c.s...@truebit.nl wrote:
Hi,
I have two machines in a cluster and want to create a high available
backend = ldapsam:ldap://master.abmas.biz \
ldap://slave.abmas.biz;
Thats my fault for not using the correct example.
Adrian Sender.
From: Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: adrian sender [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: RE [Samba] Failover LDAP
Thanks Andrew and the others who gave suggestions on this. I guess the
only left now is to actually test it to see if it works.
- delamatrix
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 19:05 +1000, adrian sender wrote:
Samba 3 By Example Chapter 6.
Figure 6.3. Samba Configuration to
@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Failover LDAP? Sent: Friday, 26
May 2006 1:41:19 PM Okay, I've searched around on this, but can't find any
examples or docs. Is
there a way to specify a second ldap server in the smb.conf, in case the
primary
ldap server fails or become unreachable?
- Delamatrix
On Sun, 2006-05-28 at 19:05 +1000, adrian sender wrote:
Samba 3 By Example Chapter 6.
Figure 6.3. Samba Configuration to Use a Dual (Fail-over) LDAP Server
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://master.abmas.biz \
ldapsam:ldap://slave.abmas.biz
This is the incorrect way to
You should be able to specify them as a list
ldap server = ldap1 ldap2 ldap3
Though that was for 2.2, looking at my 3.0 confs I've got
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldapX which is local to the PDC/BDC
you probably want
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://ldap1 ldap://ldap2;
I think the
http://us5.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-Guide/2000users.html#ch7dualok
Golden Butler wrote:
Okay, I've searched around on this, but can't find any examples or docs. Is
there a way to specify a second ldap server in the smb.conf, in case the
primary ldap server fails or become unreachable?
Okay, I've searched around on this, but can't find any examples or docs. Is
there a way to specify a second ldap server in the smb.conf, in case the
primary ldap server fails or become unreachable?
- Delamatrix
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
Hey guys!
Here is my setup:
We have 2 buildings across several subnets. The buildings are connected
by wireless radio connection. The PDC is located at one building.
Occasionally we have had connection problems with our wireless link. In
the event that this goes down, we are placing
Hello,
I have some general failover/redundancy questions:
1) Is it possible to have samba use multiple ldap
servers without an external load balancing solution
like a Cisco CSS?
2) I want to have samba be my dfs root. How can I
have redundant/failover dfs root servers again without
some sort of
If I understand you correctly, you are going to deploy Samba as a BDC to
a Windows PDC. This won't work. See section 6.4.2 of the Samba HOWTO
Collection. What you would need to do is set up a Samba PDC with LDAP
and then set up the second box as a Samba BDC with a slave LDAP
database.
-Chris
On
PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Alan Hicks
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Samba Failover
This problem has just been dumped into my lap over the last two or three
days. I'm hopelessly in over my head here, and I'm hoping I can get some
direction here. I've
Hi all,
I've been asked to produce a plan for samba failover for an office with
about 30 2000/XP machines and a few unix servers. We currently have a
FreeBSD single-harddrive SCSI box providing samba, dhcp and dns services.
Reliability and cost are the priorities, in that order, over
speed
So, my suggestion is IDE hardware RAID 1,
Since you asked, I would go with Raid 5. Your load
being 20-30 clients is very light.
is this a standard and good plan?
Depends on many factors as your prereqs are generic
being reliability and cost. I mean thats just about
every ones prereq.
You
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Jeanne Schock; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba failover plan on unix OS using hardware RAID
Bri-
I appreciate the comments. To answer some questions
Jeanne Schock said on Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:19:42PM -0400:
comments. I need to be certain, that if one harddrive fails, that the other
harddrive will continue as the pdc without any disturbance between XP client
and samba server, ie. no loss of trust relationship. Simply put, my bosses
want
The RAID hardware is far below samba (or even the operating
system), by design. The way that a RAID 5 works is that if you lose 1
drive, nothing notices
(except the RAID monitor software, which will hopefully start calling
pagers to
get the failed drive replaced). Samba won't even notice that
Well, I was wondering how to setup samba installations to provide
fail-over for linux boxes that will be acting as a print-server for
windows clients in an NT Domain (windows PDC and WINS servers). I
didn't see any ideas in The Unofficial Samba Howto and the Samba-
HOWTO-Collection. I was
28 matches
Mail list logo
