I am using Samba 3.6.6 on Debian Wheezy.
I want to be able to change www files on my dev server using my macbook.
So I setup samba and made a share for the /var/www directory.
I added the users bart root to samba to connect. And connect using command K
and then smb://192.168.2.100 (my samba
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 16:20 Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
Simplest solution is to put unix extensions = no in your smb.conf and
restart Samba. Though this requires that you don't rely on them
elsewhere.
Thanks I will do that just to be sure.
Just now I found another solution as well:
Removing
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 11:45 +0200, Bart-Jan van Hummel wrote:
I am using Samba 3.6.6 on Debian Wheezy.
I want to be able to change www files on my dev server using my macbook.
That is your problem right there. The MacOS X smb client does not
generally respect force user/group parameters when
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:32 PM, TAKAHASHI Motonobu mo...@monyo.com wrote:
From: Patric Falinder patric.falin...@omg.nu
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:40:01 +0200
It's not that often that I'm messing around with Samba but I have a
dilemma
that I need some help with.
I have a share called
So I found a solution that will work for me.
inherit owner = yes
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Patric Falinder patric.falin...@omg.nuwrote:
Hi,
It's not that often that I'm messing around with Samba but I have a
dilemma that I need some help with.
I have a share called common, users
Hi,
It's not that often that I'm messing around with Samba but I have a dilemma
that I need some help with.
I have a share called common, users can create folders and files just
fine but I'm wondering if it's possible to force folders/files to be
created with certain user/group owner in just
On 08/29/2013 04:40 AM, Patric Falinder wrote:
Hi,
It's not that often that I'm messing around with Samba but I have a dilemma
that I need some help with.
I have a share called common, users can create folders and files just
fine but I'm wondering if it's possible to force folders/files to be
From: Patric Falinder patric.falin...@omg.nu
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:40:01 +0200
It's not that often that I'm messing around with Samba but I have a dilemma
that I need some help with.
I have a share called common, users can create folders and files just
fine but I'm wondering if it's
Hello,
when I set
guest ok = yes
and
force user = some_user
for a share and a client connects as guest, does samba switch to the
user 'some_user' when it accesses the share's directory? To me it looks
like samba did do this up to version 3.6.12 but does no longer with
version 3.6.13:
Hai,
small question.
Im running debian squeeze, samba 3.6.6-2~bpo60+1 in with domain with ldap.
I joint my domain with a new server as domain member, so far so good.
im having problems with the force user parameter.
Its not working. ;-)
the force group is working fine.
strange
Hi,
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 08:37:07PM -0400, mrosa...@eastgranby.k12.ct.us wrote:
Last month, I updated to Fedora 10 with samba 3.2.11-0.30.fc10 via a
complete reinstall. Using x86-64. We are now experiencing a problem on a
share with the force user parameter.
[zz]
comment = Test
Last month, I updated to Fedora 10 with samba 3.2.11-0.30.fc10 via a
complete reinstall. Using x86-64. We are now experiencing a problem on a
share with the force user parameter.
[zz]
comment = Test Share
path = /home/zz
force user = zzadminp
create mask = 0770
The folder is owned by a local group which belongs to the application.
And I dont want to add developers to this application group. I did it
now with the force user option and read only. This way I can make
sure that they can always read the application logs (because they are
owned by the app
Hi
I need a share with read-only access for some developers (to read
logfiles). the logfiles are owned by the application user and group
and have 700 permissions. I have set up the share like this:
path = /applicationx/logs
read only = Yes
valid users =
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 08:45 +0200, Urs Golla wrote:
Hi
I need a share with read-only access for some developers (to read
logfiles). the logfiles are owned by the application user and group
and have 700 permissions. I have set up the share like this:
path = /applicationx/logs
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 17:08 +0200, Urs Golla wrote:
This works only if the samba user is also the owner of the file.
Please CC the list so that other users can benefit from this
conversation and if I'm mistaken, somebody else can correct me.
The users (or groups) will still need file system
Hi,
Is there a way that I can force the user based on the directory name? I have
administrators who need to place files in the [homes] directories of
multiple users, and I need the user of all the files to be based on the name
of the directory (the user cannot be administrator even when the
hevfuture wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way that I can force the user based on the directory name? I have
administrators who need to place files in the [homes] directories of
multiple users, and I need the user of all the files to be based on the name
of the directory (the user cannot be administrator
Environment: Fedora Core 5 with all updates, Samba 3.0.23c.
We have a share with a definition like:
[computerclub]
path = /home/D13/computerclub
valid users = D13\administrator D13\computerclub D13\cmueller
force user = D13\computerclub
writeable = yes
This
Hello again,
Okay so I realize the error I made with the SUID ans SGID. Those
settings represent what user/group the file is executed under. Must
have had a brain cramp or something. I would however still appreciate
some assistance in trying to get rid of the force user setting I am
having to use
Hi all,
I am trying to get rid of a force user setting on our samba server. I
read an article that talked about setting the SUID and SGID on the
top-level directory, and all sub-directories, of a share and this would
cause all files to be own by the user and group for which the sticky bit
has
I have samba 3.0.4 set up as a PDC and have a problem with using force user with
thie following share:
[shared]
path = /usr/local/samba/shared
write list = usera, userb, userc
force user = usera
guest ok = true
If I try to write a file from an XP system as usera I get an Access is
I have samba 3.0.4 set up as a PDC and have a problem with using force user
with thie following share:
[shared]
path = /usr/local/samba/shared
write list = usera, userb, userc
force user = usera
guest ok = true
If I try to write a file from an XP system as usera I get an Access is
It's not in the code. It makes no sense anyway since you will just be
forcing yourself to be yourself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael Gasch
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 6:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] force user = %u
does samba understand
force user = %u
in [homes]
thxbye
--
Matrix - more than a vision
**
Michael Gasch
- Central IT Department -
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
Deutscher Platz 6
04103
Hello list
The Samba Howto Collection repeatedly asserts that by setting the sticky
bit on directories any files created in those directories will be created
with the owner set to that of the directory (for example, see
SNIP
This has never worked for me. Files created inherit the group of the
directory, but not the owner. I have even followed, line for line, the
sequence on that page as follows:
# chmod 6775 /foodbar
$ ls -al /foodbar/..
You should see:
drwsrwsr-x 2 jack engr48 2003-02-04 09:55 foodbar
Robert Sossomon wrote:
You should see that the file Afile created by Jill will have ownership
and permissions of Jack, as follows:
-rw-r--r-- 1 jack engr 0 2003-02-04 09:57 Afile
That all works right up until the last line, where I see the file owner
is jill, not jack. Maybe I've
, June 03, 2004 2:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Samba] Force user
Hello list
The Samba Howto Collection repeatedly asserts that by setting the sticky
bit on directories any files created in those directories will be created
with the owner set to that of the directory (for example, see
What does the Force user and Force Group option do under the homes and
profiles section of the smb.conf file do?
Jose
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Jose Martinez schrieb:
What does the Force user and Force Group option do under the homes and
profiles section of the smb.conf file do?
Jose
hi, per default a file is created with the permissions of the creator
in a samba share, with force user you can force the creator to be a
different user
Hello.
I am making a new samba server. My old samba server was a RedHat machine
(6.2) with samba 2.0.7 on it. My new samba server is a Gentoo machine with
Samba 3.0.2a.
Aside from the fact that I am now using ADS instead of a traditional NT4
domain -- everything else is the same. I am
Okay.
Nevermind. I got it.
Chris
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 01:18 pm, Chris wrote:
Hello.
I am making a new samba server. My old samba server was a RedHat machine
(6.2) with samba 2.0.7 on it. My new samba server is a Gentoo machine with
Samba 3.0.2a.
Aside from the fact that I am now
:0)
Just kidding. I wouldn't do that to you guys :0)
I just hate it when people get the answer they want, and then don't post the
solution! How selfish!
The answer was this: admin users = chris, administrator
Apparently, this is handled differently in 2.0.7 than it is in 3.0.2a. 3.0.2a
I am in the process of expanding access to a share that currently has the
following configuration:
[uniqname]
comment = Unique comment
path = /path/to/the/stuff
public = no
writable = yes
printable = no
valid users = user1,user2,user3
force user = cooluser
I want to add
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, William R. Knox wrote:
I am in the process of expanding access to a share that currently has the
following configuration:
[uniqname]
comment = Unique comment
path = /path/to/the/stuff
public = no
writable = yes
printable = no
valid users =
can change or delete.
- Original Message -
From: info [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 1:21 AM
Subject: [Samba] Force User -
Hello,
I am using Samba shares as a way for my users to publish files from
their
Windows XP PC's to my Apache Web
.
- Original Message -
From: Yura Pismerov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: info [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Force User -
You will need ACL support.
info wrote:
Hello,
I am using Samba shares as a way for my users
Hello,
I am using Samba shares as a way for my users to publish files from their
Windows XP PC's to my Apache Web Server on Red Hat Linux.
The username I use for Apache is apache and it has full read,write and
execute access on all the files within my webserver root directory. In the
Samba
You will need ACL support.
info wrote:
Hello,
I am using Samba shares as a way for my users to publish files from their
Windows XP PC's to my Apache Web Server on Red Hat Linux.
The username I use for Apache is apache and it has full read,write and
execute access on all the
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Force User -
You will need ACL support.
info wrote:
Hello,
I am using Samba shares as a way for my users to publish files from
their
Windows XP PC's to my Apache Web Server on Red Hat Linux.
The username I use
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Ssltbivdc.com wrote:
Hello,
I am using a samba share to upload files from my PC to an intranet server
running apache on red hat 6.2.
However, i always want the user/owner of the file to be apache and the group
to be webdev. BUt even though I set these options in
Hello,
I am using a samba share to upload files from my PC to an intranet server
running apache on red hat 6.2.
However, i always want the user/owner of the file to be apache and the group
to be webdev. BUt even though I set these options in samba when I create a
file and upload to the intranet
Hi,
I'm running 2.2.3a on Solaris 8 (108528-12). There's a share that was
working fine using a force user param enabled. It has stopped working
and I'm not sure how to go about debugging. Any ideas?
robstewart
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
44 matches
Mail list logo
