[Samba] Re: Review Request: Samba-3 by Example Update

2005-04-15 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 02:41:49AM -0600, John H Terpstra wrote: 2) Do the new Update and Migration chapters satisfy the demand for better documentation of the migration and update process? If not, what must be added to make this documentation complete? The major obstacle I see with customers

[Samba] Re: Review Request: Samba-3 by Example Update

2005-04-14 Thread Jim C.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 | so having something like what I suggested above in the NT4 Migration chapter | is still relevant. Please John would you consider it? OOO!! Forward those to me?!? :-) Jim C. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using

Re: [Samba] Re: Review Request: Samba-3 by Example Update

2005-04-14 Thread John H Terpstra
On Thursday 14 April 2005 21:00, Jim C. wrote: | so having something like what I suggested above in the NT4 Migration chapter is still relevant. Please John would you consider it? OOO!! Forward those to me?!? :-) Just bear with me a little. I am updating the entire chapter. As soon as I