Am 02.04.2012 07:43, schrieb Massimiliano Perantoni:
Hi,
the distribution is a Debian 6 but I compiled samba myself against a self
compiled openldap 2.4.26.
Actually the only difference is the openldap client libraries version,
I do use 2.3 instead of 2.4, but using getent, as I stated
Hi,
could you send me the setup?
Which lines did you add?
Whici distro do you run?
Thanks!
Il 31 marzo 2012 22:11, Stephan steff...@gmx.de ha scritto:
Am 31.03.2012 20:56, schrieb Steve Thompson:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the
Hey,
the distribution is a Debian 6 but I compiled samba myself against a
self compiled openldap 2.4.26. The passdb backend line doesn't look
different than yours (except the server names of course ;-)). You are
not running nscd by chance ? If so does getent passwd work with a
simulated
Hi,
the distribution is a Debian 6 but I compiled samba myself against a self
compiled openldap 2.4.26.
Actually the only difference is the openldap client libraries version,
I do use 2.3 instead of 2.4, but using getent, as I stated before,
works...
If I do getent passwd I get, with the
Hi,
I have a quite simple setup for a particular customer that loves
redundancy and failover.
PDC + BDC with LDAP Passwords on two 389-ds in multimaster node +
several samba member servers
Actually pointing singularly on both the systems everything works great.
As soon as I modify my passdb
Of Massimiliano Perantoni
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:12 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Samba LDAP Failover
Hi,
I have a quite simple setup for a particular customer that loves
redundancy and failover.
PDC + BDC with LDAP Passwords on two 389-ds in multimaster node + several
samba member
Perantoni
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 6:12 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Samba LDAP Failover
Hi,
I have a quite simple setup for a particular customer that loves
redundancy and failover.
PDC + BDC with LDAP Passwords on two 389-ds in multimaster node + several
samba
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap
backends.You should have samba_server_1 using ldap_server_1 and
samba_server_2 using ldap_server_2.
Samba most certainly does support multiple LDAP backends. There's even an
I'm exactly using that, without luck...
--
Massimiliano Perantoni
site: http://www.perantoni.net
Il 31 marzo 2012 15:35, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com ha scritto:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap
backends.
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
I'm exactly using that, without luck...
Not sure what to tell you; I have used multiple LDAP servers in the past
with success, although these days I use a single virtual LDAP server which
load balances across a set of backend servers. What
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same.
Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap failover?
Il 31 marzo 2012 19:04, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com ha scritto:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
I'm exactly using that, without luck...
Not
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same.
Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap failover?
I was using 3.0.33 at the time, on CentOS 5 x86_64. Not sure which
revision of CentOS; it was a while ago.
Steve
Am 31.03.2012 20:56, schrieb Steve Thompson:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same.
Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap
failover?
I was using 3.0.33 at the time, on CentOS 5 x86_64. Not sure which
13 matches
Mail list logo
