[Samba] Samba Slow, and I have high Quality NICS

2004-02-24 Thread Anson Rinesmith
I have SLOW file transfers across samba to my Windows Server 2000 domain.

I am using a built in 100bT Intel Pro NIC, I have tried the built in gigabit
NIC and a PCI 3com, all with the same results.

Using iperf, I get about 45-90Mb of bandwidth from my PC's to my samba
server.

I can pull it up by \\servername file:///\\servername  or \\ipaddress
file:///\\ipaddress  with out any issues. I can ping servername
successfully.

It is taking about 15 minutes to just pull across a 10mb file.

I've seen a lot of complaints about this on the web via google but no one
seems to have conquered it.

Anyone have a fix for this? I would owe you a steak dinner.

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba Slow, and I have high Quality NICS

2004-02-24 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 12:13, Anson Rinesmith wrote:
 I have SLOW file transfers across samba to my Windows Server 2000 domain.
 
 I am using a built in 100bT Intel Pro NIC, I have tried the built in gigabit
 NIC and a PCI 3com, all with the same results.
 
 Using iperf, I get about 45-90Mb of bandwidth from my PC's to my samba
 server.
 
 I can pull it up by \\servername file:///\\servername  or \\ipaddress
 file:///\\ipaddress  with out any issues. I can ping servername
 successfully.
 
 It is taking about 15 minutes to just pull across a 10mb file.
 
 I've seen a lot of complaints about this on the web via google but no one
 seems to have conquered it.
 
 Anyone have a fix for this? I would owe you a steak dinner.

of course, you didn't say where...

most of the time, this is caused by 100 baseT switch with 4 wire (2
pair) cables - cat 3 cables on cat 5 connection. causes hell with
auto-negotiation.

what is output of ifconfig?

Craig

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Samba Slow, and I have high Quality NICS

2004-02-24 Thread Anson Rinesmith
fxp1: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet 192.168.69.24 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.69.255
inet6 fe80::2e0:81ff:fe20:ea29%fxp1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
ether 00:e0:81:20:ea:29
media: Ethernet 100baseTX full-duplex
status: active

 -Original Message-
 From: Craig White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 2:09 PM
 To: Anson Rinesmith
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Slow, and I have high Quality NICS
 
 On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 12:13, Anson Rinesmith wrote:
  I have SLOW file transfers across samba to my Windows Server 2000
 domain.
 
  I am using a built in 100bT Intel Pro NIC, I have tried the built in
 gigabit
  NIC and a PCI 3com, all with the same results.
 
  Using iperf, I get about 45-90Mb of bandwidth from my PC's to my samba
  server.
 
  I can pull it up by \\servername file:///\\servername  or \\ipaddress
  file:///\\ipaddress  with out any issues. I can ping servername
  successfully.
 
  It is taking about 15 minutes to just pull across a 10mb file.
 
  I've seen a lot of complaints about this on the web via google but no
 one
  seems to have conquered it.
 
  Anyone have a fix for this? I would owe you a steak dinner.
 
 of course, you didn't say where...
 
 most of the time, this is caused by 100 baseT switch with 4 wire (2
 pair) cables - cat 3 cables on cat 5 connection. causes hell with
 auto-negotiation.
 
 what is output of ifconfig?
 
 Craig

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Samba Slow, and I have high Quality NICS

2004-02-24 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 13:43, Anson Rinesmith wrote:
 fxp1: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
 inet 192.168.69.24 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.69.255
 inet6 fe80::2e0:81ff:fe20:ea29%fxp1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
 ether 00:e0:81:20:ea:29
 media: Ethernet 100baseTX full-duplex
 status: active
 

clearly not a Linux system...at least not something that I would
recognize.

I would try these troubleshooting techniques...

- swap cables for known good cat 6 (gigabit ethernet), or cat 5 (100base
T)
- swap switch for a known good switch

- check with sizable ftp transfers (instead of smb) to make certain that
it is or isn't a samba issue.

Craig

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


RE: [Samba] Samba Slow, and I have high Quality NICS

2004-02-24 Thread Van Sickler, Jim
Anson,

  Can you try setting the NIC to 10Mbps/Half
 and Full Duplex to see if the transfer times
improve?

I put in a switch a while back , and have a 
Lexmark Optra printer with a NIC capable\
of 10/100. The LAN cabling is shielded CAT3.

  The Optra would negotiate to 100Mbps with
the switch, but printing took forever.
I locked the NIC at 10Mbps, and normal
printing resumed immediately.  Sounds a little
like your problem.

I suspect something similar on your
connection;  CAT3/CAT4 cabling or bad cabling,
and the NIC negotiating a higher connection
speed than is actually supported.

Hope this helps.
Jim


 -Original Message-
 From: Anson Rinesmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 12:13 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Samba] Samba Slow, and I have high Quality NICS
 
 
 I have SLOW file transfers across samba to my Windows Server 
 2000 domain.
 
 I am using a built in 100bT Intel Pro NIC, I have tried the 
 built in gigabit
 NIC and a PCI 3com, all with the same results.
 
 Using iperf, I get about 45-90Mb of bandwidth from my PC's to my samba
 server.
 
 I can pull it up by \\servername file:///\\servername  or 
 \\ipaddress
 file:///\\ipaddress  with out any issues. I can ping servername
 successfully.
 
 It is taking about 15 minutes to just pull across a 10mb file.
 
 I've seen a lot of complaints about this on the web via 
 google but no one
 seems to have conquered it.
 
 Anyone have a fix for this? I would owe you a steak dinner.
 
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
 
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba Slow, and I have high Quality NICS

2004-02-24 Thread Spam

 Would  not  the  first  action  to  be to test transmitting data with
 another  application  than  Samba?  For  example  trying  NFS, FTP or
 something similar.

 I  have  also problems with Samba when transmitting larger amounts of
 data  (100MiB or so) to the Samba machine. Samba (or something) would
 simply  drop  connections.  However, using FTP or NFS things are nice
 and speedy. (Tested with 2.6.x and Samba 2.2.8a/3.0.2a)

 Anson,

   Can you try setting the NIC to 10Mbps/Half
  and Full Duplex to see if the transfer times
 improve?

 I put in a switch a while back , and have a 
 Lexmark Optra printer with a NIC capable\
 of 10/100. The LAN cabling is shielded CAT3.

   The Optra would negotiate to 100Mbps with
 the switch, but printing took forever.
 I locked the NIC at 10Mbps, and normal
 printing resumed immediately.  Sounds a little
 like your problem.

 I suspect something similar on your
 connection;  CAT3/CAT4 cabling or bad cabling,
 and the NIC negotiating a higher connection
 speed than is actually supported.

 Hope this helps.
 Jim


 -Original Message-
 From: Anson Rinesmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 12:13 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Samba] Samba Slow, and I have high Quality NICS
 
 
 I have SLOW file transfers across samba to my Windows Server 
 2000 domain.
 
 I am using a built in 100bT Intel Pro NIC, I have tried the 
 built in gigabit
 NIC and a PCI 3com, all with the same results.
 
 Using iperf, I get about 45-90Mb of bandwidth from my PC's to my samba
 server.
 
 I can pull it up by \\servername file:///\\servername  or 
 \\ipaddress
 file:///\\ipaddress  with out any issues. I can ping servername
 successfully.
 
 It is taking about 15 minutes to just pull across a 10mb file.
 
 I've seen a lot of complaints about this on the web via 
 google but no one
 seems to have conquered it.
 
 Anyone have a fix for this? I would owe you a steak dinner.
 
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
 




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba