From: Baird, Josh jba...@follett.com
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 21:16:57 +
Sorry for the top post.
If I only wanted to use ACLs to control access, and not Samba as
indicated in my OP, should I use security = share mode?
Setting particular account as guest account and put permissions to that
: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Permissions
From: Baird, Josh jba...@follett.com
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 20:58:22 +
I thought I had this working correctly, but sometimes it randomly breaks.
Here is an example of a share's configuration:
[testshare]
comment = Test Share
From: Baird, Josh jba...@follett.com
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2012 20:58:22 +
I thought I had this working correctly, but sometimes it randomly breaks.
Here is an example of a share's configuration:
[testshare]
comment = Test Share
path = /test/testshare
writeable = yes
create mask =
Hi,
I have a case where I only want to restrict access to SMB shares via filesystem
permissions (and POSIX ACLs). Therefore, I do not want Samba to verify
security in any way at the SMB level. If the filesystem/ACL permissions allow
access to the shared directory, so should Samba. If the
Hi,
I understand that Linux permissions override Samba permissions. But is it
also the case that the Samba permissions override the Linux permissions?
Example:
I have a samba share called SHARE. This is disabled by default and is
configured for write access by group MY_GROUP.
The
Hi Stephen,
I'm not a Samba expert, but a long-time samba user.
From what you stated, I believe any user would be able to enter the share
and read/write/execute all of its contents.
The three groups of three rwxrwxrwx =
First, what the directory/file owner can do
Second, what the directory/file
...@byshenk.net]
Sent: 26 November 2011 17:44
To: Stephen Elliott
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Permissions vs Linux Permissions
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 04:46:02PM -, Stephen Elliott wrote:
I understand that Linux permissions override Samba permissions. But is
it also
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 04:46:02PM -, Stephen Elliott wrote:
I understand that Linux permissions override Samba permissions. But is it
also the case that the Samba permissions override the Linux permissions?
Example:
I have a samba share called SHARE. This is disabled by default and
Greetings list,
I'm having a problem setting file permissions for users connecting to my
samba file server. CentOS 5.4, samba-3.0.33-3.15.el5_4.1.
I have authentication configured to use winbind, and name services
configured to use LDAP.
I've configured valid users in smb.conf to contain
On 1/22/2010 4:23 PM, Dale Schroeder wrote:
On 01/22/2010 3:25 PM, Robert Steinmetz AIA wrote:
Dale Schroeder wrote:
On 01/21/2010 3:08 PM, Robert Steinmetz AIA wrote:
I need help understanding what is happening and trouble shooting.
I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain
On 01/21/2010 3:08 PM, Robert Steinmetz AIA wrote:
I need help understanding what is happening and trouble shooting.
I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain Controller one
as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and
winbindd using the tdb back end are
Dale Schroeder wrote:
On 01/21/2010 3:08 PM, Robert Steinmetz AIA wrote:
I need help understanding what is happening and trouble shooting.
I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain Controller
one as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and
winbindd using
I need help understanding what is happening and trouble shooting.
I have two servers running Samba 2.3.3, one as a Domain Controller one
as a Member Server. Both are running Ubuntu 8.10. smbd, nmbd and
winbindd using the tdb back end are running on both.
I have two shares on the member
I have fought with these before. I finally got them down the way that I
wanted them, but I was wanting to set this up a bit different. I want to
make sure that there is no way to do this without actually having to
assign a bunch of different drive letters to shares.
I basically one one Drive
sgm...@mail.bloomfield.k12.mo.us wrote:
I have fought with these before. I finally got them down the way that I
wanted them, but I was wanting to set this up a bit different. I want to
make sure that there is no way to do this without actually having to
assign a bunch of different drive
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 03:49:44PM -0400, Steve Payne wrote:
Folks,
We have a sun server that uses samba for our file shares. Our work
stations are Windows xp and Windows Vista. I have noticed that on vista
when I store files or create files, the permissions on windows vista
shows no
Folks,
We have a sun server that uses samba for our file shares. Our work
stations are Windows xp and Windows Vista. I have noticed that on vista
when I store files or create files, the permissions on windows vista
shows no permissions. What would cause this? Our unix servers are part
of our
Hi, can anybody help me with the following please:-
I've have just migrated to a new server (old FC5, new FC6). I have migrated
my samba config from the old box.
As far as I can see, the config is correct (I hardly changed anything), but
samba logs a /mnt/share permission denied error when I
Guinness2702 wrote:
Hi, can anybody help me with the following please:-
I've have just migrated to a new server (old FC5, new FC6). I have
migrated my samba config from the old box.
[snip]
Well after lots of experimenting, and more googling, I got it sussed, and
thought I'd pass
Hello,
Is there a special permission setting or command for Samba shares
on a seperate partition? I can access share /tmp, /var/tmp, or any other
folder that I define in the samba.conf on hda2 but not a folder which is
located on a different partition.
I have the path as /hda3/FTP/Pub.
Scott Mayo wrote:
There was another tech coordinator that asked the following on our list:
Hey all, I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to give students
read/write permissions to a certain drive letter without giving them the
ability to delete other (or thier own) files.
If they had
There was another tech coordinator that asked the following on our list:
Hey all, I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to give students
read/write permissions to a certain drive letter without giving them the
ability to delete other (or thier own) files. Currently I have chmod
1770
Scott Mayo wrote:
There was another tech coordinator that asked the following on our list:
Hey all, I was wondering if anyone knew of a way to give students
read/write permissions to a certain drive letter without giving them the
ability to delete other (or thier own) files. Currently I
I am working on my permissions and something does not quite make sense
to me. Here is what I have set.
/DIR (Unix permissions are 3777)
Then in samba I have the following
[dir]
path = /DIR
read only = no
valid users @teach @student
create mask 3660
directory mask 3770
Then from a
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [29/07/2005 1119EDT]:
I am working on my permissions and something does not quite make sense
to me. Here is what I have set.
/DIR (Unix permissions are 3777)
Then in samba I have the following
[dir]
path = /DIR
read only = no
valid users @teach @student
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [29/07/2005 1205EDT]:
[...]
However, your new directory *inherited* the setgid bit (effectively a
bitwise OR); this is simply the behavior of setgid bits on directories.
From the man page for the stat() system call (section 2):
The set GID bit (S_ISGID) has several
Keith Warno wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [29/07/2005 1119EDT]:
I am working on my permissions and something does not quite make sense
to me. Here is what I have set.
/DIR (Unix permissions are 3777)
Then in samba I have the following
[dir]
path = /DIR
read only = no
valid users
Scott Mayo wrote:
Keith Warno wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [29/07/2005 1119EDT]:
I am working on my permissions and something does not quite make
sense to me. Here is what I have set.
/DIR (Unix permissions are 3777)
Then in samba I have the following
[dir]
path = /DIR
read only
Scott Mayo wrote:
Scott Mayo wrote:
Keith Warno wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [29/07/2005 1119EDT]:
I am working on my permissions and something does not quite make
sense to me. Here is what I have set.
/DIR (Unix permissions are 3777)
Then in samba I have the following
[dir]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dirk Broodryk wrote:
| I am running samba 2.2.7a on 9.1 p4 2400
...
| Mainly I have two problems.. and it doesn't matter what
| I do.. I can't get it fixed.. Mangement is at to point of
| discarding the samba server and going back to NT wich
| I am
Hi all..
I realy hope someone can help.. I am at the verge of jumping...
I am running samba 2.2.7a on 9.1 p4 2400
The logons work fine .. and all shares work fine..
Mainly I have two problems.. and it doesn't matter what I do.. I can't get it fixed..
Mangement is at to point of discarding the
Well, I thought I knew Samba permissions, but I guess I don't.
Currently, any user that has an account on the Samba server has access
to the share Accounting.
So, let's say I have user1, user2, user3, user4
I have added user1, user2 and user3 to the accounting group. user4 is
not a member of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, I thought I knew Samba permissions, but I guess I don't.
Currently, any user that has an account on the Samba server has access
to the share Accounting.
So, let's say I have user1, user2, user3, user4
I have added user1, user2 and user3 to the accounting group.
I have a share setup to allow only a specific group.
eg.
[projects]
path = /Volumes/iRAID/projects
public = NO
read only = NO
comment = Project Files
force directory mode = 0770
force create mode = 0770
valid users = @projects
the
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
Great the @group seemed to do the job.
Now another more difficult question.
Accounting group contains user1, user2, user3
These people must have read and write permissions to this directory.
But user4 must have read only permission.
All other
Hi,
I am a newbie here.
I am runnning Samba 2.2.3a which act as a NT workstation
connecting to CNS-NT domain.
When I tried to connect to Samba, \\Bigred\home is not
accessible, you might not have permission to use this network resource.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
-Paul
Here is the situation. I have setup a samba server to authenticate against
Active Directory. I have created a group under my Linux server and created
all the accounts that need to access the share and placed them in the Linux
group on the samba server. I gave
the group full rights to the samba
Here is the situation. I have setup a samba server to authenticate against
Active Directory. I have created a group under my Linux server and created
all the accounts that need to access the share and placed them in the Linux
group on the samba server. I gave
the group full rights to the samba
Here is the situation. I have setup a samba server to authenticate against
Active Directory. I have created a group under my linux server and created
all the accounts that need to access the share on the samba server. I gave
the group the rights to the samba share, but when a user adds to the
I am at Samba 2.2.4 on Solaris 8 using Win2000 clients. The system default
umask is 022 in /etc/profile and I have set user umask to 002 in .profile.
Does Samba read/interpret either of these? All other setting are default
but I have set global permissions to;
create mask = 0664
force create
Hi,
Im having a slight
problem with samba permissions.
Here goes my scenario:
Red Hat Linux 8.0 with
samba
I got a samba share public
Users can access the
share and write there what they need, but if a user creates a directory, other
users cant access it.
How can I
set a directory mask of 775
see the samba docs...
This parameter is the octal modes which are used when converting DOS
modes to UNIX modes when creating UNIX directories.
When a directory is created, the necessary permissions are
calculated according to the mapping from DOS modes to
42 matches
Mail list logo
