I posted the url because it has smbfs patches for
receive timeout
..avoiding D state for offline servers which seemed
your problem.
Don't know the answer to you questions. But, if you
rephrase them to use
smbfs in place of smbmount (which is an helper),
I'd say
1. with patch
2. no
--
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:09:21 -0700 (PDT), Richard Duran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you for clearing that up. Since we are running
kernel 2.4.18, and this patch appears to apply to
2.4.4, is it safe to assume that this patch need not
be applied?
No. I briefly looked at an 2.4.18something Red
Thank you for the URL. That will be a good reference
in the future, but for now, I feel that some questions
remain unanswered.
1. Does smbmount use a keep alive time setting?
2. Does smbmount use the smb.conf file?
Regards,
-Richard Duran
--- Giulio Orsero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 16
Greetings,
I don't know how common an issue this is as I haven't
found much in the list archives that was helpful to
me, so I'm hoping for some pointers.
FYI, we have samba 2.3.3a-6 running on the 2.4.18-10
kernel.
There seems to be an issue with smbfs mounts at times
where connectivity may be
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:43:30 -0700 (PDT), Richard Duran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There seems to be an issue with smbfs mounts at times
where connectivity may be lost (e.g. Win share becomes
unavailable) causing local processes such as lsof or
ps, among others, to hang.
