Re: [Samba] How Is Administrator Treated?

2004-05-20 Thread Les Bell
Les Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First: I created an Administrator account in Linux, and it wound up (here) with a UID/GID of 604. That's just an ordinary user ID, so what makes it special as far as the domain is concerned? Should the Administrator account have a UID/GID of 0? If I try to run

RE: [Samba] How Is Administrator Treated?

2004-05-20 Thread John H Terpstra
Les, On the UNIX system addition/change of user accounts requires UID=0. If you want your Administrator to be able to manage user accounts UID=0 is a must. Also, the RID for Administrator must be 500 for the account to have admin privileges in Windows. If you are using and LDAP backend it is

RE: [Samba] How Is Administrator Treated?

2004-05-20 Thread Umberto Zanatta
What do it mens? I've the same problem; smbldap-tools made sambaSid for Administrator like: S-1-5-21-x-2996 I have to change it to 500? I have root acccount in passwd file and Administrator account in ldap tree with uid=0; does it a misunderstand? regards; Il gio, 2004-05-20 alle

RE: [Samba] How Is Administrator Treated?

2004-05-20 Thread Les Bell
Andreas S. Haramasz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: edit /etc/passwd and change UID 604 to 1 for Administrator (Windows uses 0 for super user on Unix it is 1). Uh-uh: now that I *am* sure about - root on Unix is 0, while on Windows the domain Administrator is SID -500 (and the Domain Administrators