-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Meyer wrote:
If instead the response was: yes, this inconsistency is a
problem (bug) -- the causes however, are particularly insidious,
and will take some major reworking and the fixing of contributory
problems before we can properly address
At 09:26 PM 3/3/2006, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Don Meyer wrote:
As far as trying to at least get Domain Local group handling fixed in
winbind, I would suggest looking at Bug 3530 on bugzilla.samba.org.
The more people that can show similar failure cases, the more likely we
can convince
. Domain Local
doesn't work at all unless the user is in the same domain as the group.
How do we get this escalated?
-Original Message-
From: Don Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 6:06 PM
To: Trimble, Ronald D; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Problem
unless the user is in the same domain as the group.
How do we get this escalated?
-Original Message-
From: Don Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 6:06 PM
To: Trimble, Ronald D; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Problem with Universal Groups
Check your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don Meyer wrote:
I can't speak for Domain Universal/Global groups -- our read of the MS
documentation indicated that other-domain users were not valid within
Universal/Global groups, but were in a Domain Local Group.
As far as trying to at least
Check your winbind group memberships -- I'm willing to bet that your
winbind will only show group membership for users in the same domain
as the group. We are seeing the same mis-behavior here. Group
members from other domains are simply not being enumerated by winbind
as a group member
