RE: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!)

2003-02-17 Thread David Brodbeck
-Original Message- From: Robert Adkins II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I have read a few more of your responses. It appears that you believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced questions are going unanswered simply because of the volume of lower skilled questions. I see it

RE: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!)

2003-02-17 Thread John H Terpstra
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, David Brodbeck wrote: -Original Message- From: Robert Adkins II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I have read a few more of your responses. It appears that you believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced questions are going unanswered simply because of

Re: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!)

2003-02-14 Thread Chris de Vidal
--- Kurt Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wow / i did newer see such a response to a theme as in this case! :-O Yeah, it actually had the opposite effect of what I was begging people to do :-P here's a suggestion: i did send (in a view cases) a short message to this 'NEWBEES' with important

RE: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!)

2003-02-14 Thread Robert Adkins II
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris de Vidal Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:16 AM To: Kurt Weiss Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!) --- Kurt Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wow / i did newer see

RE: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!)

2003-02-14 Thread Chris de Vidal
--- Robert Adkins II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have read a few more of your responses. It appears that you believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced questions are going unanswered simply because of the volume of lower skilled questions. That was but one of the 5 points I was making.