[PATCH] Display of quoted parameters in Swat

2002-04-24 Thread dj
Hello, There is a problem with Swat and it's handling of quoted strings. I've tested this on the latest released version of Samba (2.2.3a). Problem description: When you put quoted strings into the smb.conf file they are not displayed in swat. For example : valid users = @DOM+Domain Users in

Re: /etc/fstab entry to allow users to mount samba shares

2002-04-24 Thread Urban Widmark
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Lars Heineken wrote: I'm sorry to tell, but I Had to drop the whole thing. When I mounted the volume as root, a single read-acces onto the mountes smb-share on the client-side locked his machine. The smb-server noticed nothing. The cd-rom is mounted via supermount. All

Re: [PATCH] Display of quoted parameters in Swat

2002-04-24 Thread Steve Langasek
Hello Tim, On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 10:34:00AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a problem with Swat and it's handling of quoted strings. I've tested this on the latest released version of Samba (2.2.3a). The patch you're actually looking for is attached. Cheers, Steve Langasek

(no subject)

2002-04-24 Thread phani krishna somayajula
Hi, i had configured my linux box in office as dial in server so that i can dial up from my home pc. i am able to log onto the remote machine and do telnet or ftp. my problem is i want to access the systems present in the network with the linux server from my home.how to do that.i had

Secondary WINS Enhancement

2002-04-24 Thread Eric Roseme
Did the secondary WINS server config enhancement go into 3.0? The original was submitted by Dave Olker of HP about 2 years ago, then Chris Hertel picked it up and was re-designing it. What is the current status? Note that this is *not* redundant WINS or WINS sync. This is to be able to

(no subject)

2002-04-24 Thread Å©·¹ÀÌÁöÀ×±Û¸®½¬

Re: possible bug?

2002-04-24 Thread Gerald Carter
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Donald Wade Jr. wrote: Samba 2.2.1a on mandrake 8.1 configuration with swat Shares that are initially created through swat do not in the file system. You have to go in and create them manually for example with Konqueror. Shouldn't the shares appear within the

RE: Secondary WINS Enhancement

2002-04-24 Thread MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
Hi Eric, Yep, it's in there. you can now have a wins server= ipaddr1 ipaddr2 ipaddr3 ... and the code will build a wins_svr_list that will be used to resolve names. Hope this helps, Don -Original Message- From: Eric Roseme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:32

not able to get Samba 3.0alpha17 work with Win2k PDC using kerberos

2002-04-24 Thread P Ranjit Kumar
Hi I am trying to get Samba 3.0 alpha 17 on my HP-UX box to talk to a Win2k PDC using Kerberos. I have compiled Samba with all necessary defines in config.h. My HP-UX machine can work with the Win2K Kerberos Server. I can get the TGT by doing a kinit. I verified it with klist. net join ads

Can we remove the postscript parameter in 3.0?

2002-04-24 Thread Gerald Carter
Any objections? Does anyone use this? It's a hacky solution which seems to be better accomplished with good print filters. cheers, jerry

Re: Can we remove the postscript parameter in 3.0?

2002-04-24 Thread Rafal Szczesniak
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Gerald Carter wrote: Any objections? Does anyone use this? Not me. I agree. It's a hacky solution which seems to be better accomplished with good print filters. Yes, I also think Samba should not alter (in any way) the data to be printed. cheers,

Re: Can we remove the postscript parameter in 3.0?

2002-04-24 Thread Suhasini Rao
Please unsubscribe

Re: Can we remove the postscript parameter in 3.0?

2002-04-24 Thread Suhasini Rao
Please unsubscribe

Re: Can we remove the postscript parameter in 3.0?

2002-04-24 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Suhasini Rao wrote: Please unsubscribe If you wish to leave the list, then you may do so using the instructions at the end of each mail message. However, asking us to all unsubscribe is a bit rich! Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Re: [Samba] WinNT offline file attribute

2002-04-24 Thread Gerald Carter
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Damir Dezeljin wrote: Any news about implementation of offline file attributes (also per share offline attributes - some .conf parameter)? I looked into Samba-3.0alpha17 and Samba-2.2 but I didn't found anything. Does csc policy in smb.conf(5) help? cheers, jerry

Re: [Samba] WinNT offline file attribute

2002-04-24 Thread Shirish Kalele
Jerry, csc policy is for client-side offline caching. I think Damir is looking for Samba to support files offlined by storage managers like HSM. Both are called offline files. One of the reasons the csc policy parameter was so named. Samba could set the 'offline' flag in the files attributes to

Re: [Samba] WinNT offline file attribute

2002-04-24 Thread John E. Malmberg
Shirish Kalele wrote: snip As I understood it (and I could be wrong), indicating offline wasn't a problem, the problem was finding out if a file was offline. I'm sure Damir could code up a custom fix to make Samba do it (using ioctl's or whatever) and distribute the fix as his patch.

Re: [Samba] WinNT offline file attribute

2002-04-24 Thread Shirish Kalele
John E. Malmberg wrote: Shirish Kalele wrote: As I understood it (and I could be wrong), indicating offline wasn't a problem, the problem was finding out if a file was offline. I'm sure Damir could code up a custom fix to make Samba do it (using ioctl's or whatever) and distribute

Re: [Samba] WinNT offline file attribute

2002-04-24 Thread John E. Malmberg
Shirish Kalele wrote: John E. Malmberg wrote: The other part of the problem is identifying if the version of Windows that the client is running will honor the offline bit. How would this help? Also, how are Windows servers that support offlining different in this scenario? Seems like