On Mon, 13 May 2002, Jay Ts wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just in case I'm the first to have noticed this:
>
> $ smbclient //server/share -c "ls" -Tc
> added interface ip=172.16.1.3 bcast=172.16.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
> Segmentation fault
Well, it happens to me as well. Did you manage to get a tracebac
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> Sorry. Just to be clear, the older version of Samba that I'm running
> returns RA TRUE *if* it is running as a WINS server.
>
> I don't know what a newer version of Samba does, but I doubt this has
> changed and I really should check to see wh
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> Sorry. Just to be clear, the older version of Samba that I'm running
> returns RA TRUE *if* it is running as a WINS server.
>
> I don't know what a newer version of Samba does, but I doubt this has
> changed and I really should check to see wh
I'm trying to run smbd and nmbd under Dan Bernstein's supervise &
svscan process control programs from his daemontools package
(http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html). Jos Backus has raised this issue
in the past, re: the -i "interactive" flag and making smbd and nmbd
create their own process groups, b
Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 03:58:51AM -0600, Jordan Russell wrote:
> > Today I came across a significant bug in time.c's unix_to_nt_time()
function
> > that causes file time stamps to be 1 hour off when a file was last
modified
> > within hours of Daylight Savings Time going i
Sorry. Just to be clear, the older version of Samba that I'm running
returns RA TRUE *if* it is running as a WINS server.
I don't know what a newer version of Samba does, but I doubt this has
changed and I really should check to see what W/NT and W2K do if they are
running the WINS server.
Chri
> On Mon, 13 May 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
:
> > RA - Recursion Available.
> > Should only be set in messages which come from the NBNS (WINS)
> > server itself. Note that a machine that is running WINS will
> > also have a local name table. If the reply comes from the
> >
Sorry about the large attachment everyone, I tried canceling the send as
soon as I noticed how large the attachment was, but I obviously wasn't
fast enough.
Apologies,
T.
Guys, I'm getting the following in some of my logs:
[2002/05/14 08:36:21, 0] lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(349)
Unable to open new log file /var/log/samba/log.dancer: Too many open
files
[2002/05/14 08:36:21, 0] lib/username.c:map_username(130)
can't open username map /etc/samba/smb.user.map. Error
Guys, I'm getting the following in some of my logs:
[2002/05/14 08:36:21, 0] lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(349)
Unable to open new log file /var/log/samba/log.dancer: Too many open
files
[2002/05/14 08:36:21, 0] lib/username.c:map_username(130)
can't open username map /etc/samba/smb.user.map. Error
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 03:50:41PM -0500, root wrote:
> I was feeling rather underinformed one day, and got rather bent out of
> shape about it, so I turned my Samba debug level up to 100, because I
> can. I got the info I needed at the time, but today I noticed raw SMB
> packets being dumped int
Mike Gerdts wrote:
>
> It seems as though there was an assumption that users of winbindd would
> have switched entirely to NT domain authentication or that they would
> have distinct range of UIDs/GIDs for /etc/passwd (or NIS) and NT domain.
> Is there any good reason to not just let get_id_from
Kevin Wheatley wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if anything ever came of the session exec suggestion
> from earlier in the year ?
Not yet.
Andrew,
--
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student
Richard Sharpe wrote:
:
> These would be nice, except that I have found that these bits are
> all separate BOOLs in the decoded structure, instead of being a
> bit-field.
>
> I will have to re-assemble them :-(
Eee. Yuck.
--
Christopher R. Hertel -)- University of Mi
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
>
> 1) It would be nice to see the flags on the outgoing packet as well
>as the repl[y|ies].
>
> 2) It might make sense produce this output on debug level 1, rather
>than by default. Or perhaps incoming flags at -d1 and both sets
>a
Mike Gerdts wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 07:35, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > The username and domain may not be known at the time a mapping is
> > required. Thats the easy bit - we might not even know if it is a uid or
> > gid!
>
> Have you taken a look at the patch that I created? If not, p
I was feeling rather underinformed one day, and got rather bent out of
shape about it, so I turned my Samba debug level up to 100, because I
can. I got the info I needed at the time, but today I noticed raw SMB
packets being dumped into /tmp, each in an individual binary
file. There are rather a l
Hi Tim,
Am Montag, 13. Mai 2002 02:38 schrieb Tim Potter:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:26:41AM +0200, Juergen Hasch wrote:
> > this problem applies to 2.2.4 and partly to head, too.
> >
> > I need to set a username when connecting to a Win2K server using winbind.
> > The documentiation states "wb
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 07:35, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> The username and domain may not be known at the time a mapping is
> required. Thats the easy bit - we might not even know if it is a uid or
> gid!
Have you taken a look at the patch that I created? If not, please take
a look at http://www.ca
Hello,
I am triing to write a VFS that uncompresses compressed
read only files in the background.
I have the following problem: in VFS open returns a int,
but all the other functions want a files_struct.
How can I fill up cleanly this struct. Is there a
standard function to use ?
Thanks
Andre
It seems as though there was an assumption that users of winbindd would
have switched entirely to NT domain authentication or that they would
have distinct range of UIDs/GIDs for /etc/passwd (or NIS) and NT domain.
The most obvious sign of this is the peppering of statements like the
following th
What is IE 6.0 Patch ? I don't know U ? Is htis software ?
samba-technical <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,This is a IE 6.0 patchI wish you would like it. Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
Richard Sharpe wrote:
:
> > > Any objections?
> >
> > Nope.
>
> Actually, I was thinking that it would be useful to return the entire
> set of flags.
>
> This might be better than returning just one of them.
>
> Any further thoughts?
Well, you've got me thinking (always a dangerous thing to do
im using the samba rpm for redhat from the ftp.samba.org
i upgrade it to a copuple installations that i have and in all the upgrades
i notice the problem with smbstatus.
i copy a backup of /var/cache/samba/*.tdb and all the things work now.
i see this problem in the mailing list before related to
Jay Ts wrote:
>
> $ smbclient //server/share -c "ls" -Tc
> added interface ip=172.16.1.3 bcast=172.16.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
> Segmentation fault
BTW, I should have mentioned that I'm running Samba 2.2.4
on Red Hat 7.1 here.
Jay Ts
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Gerald Carter wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to add an additional flag to both name_query and
> > node_status_query.
> >
> > This flag will return the value of the Recursion Available flag in the
> > nmb packet header.
A message submitted by you for handling by the NCSL email server
contained a prohibited file attachment type and was not delivered
to the intended recipient. We regret that security considerations
prohibit us from processing this transaction.
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Tian-xiong Lu wrote:
> Just tried compling samba-2.2.4 on a Solaris 7 box with two configure options:
> --with-libsmbclient --with-acl-support
>
> When compiling I got a warning message like this:
> In function "sys_readdir"
> lib/system.c 331 Warning: return from incompatib
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Nicholas Brealey wrote:
> Linking shared library bin/smbwrapper.so
> ld: fatal: library -lpopt: not found
> ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to bin/smbwrapper.so
> *** Error code 1
> make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `bin/smbwrapper.so'
>
>
Builds OK now. Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Richard Bollinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Samba Technical" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: CVS 2_2 Fails to Compile on Solaris - rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c
>
Jay Ts wrote:
> Just in case I'm the first to have noticed this:
>
> $ smbclient //server/share -c "ls" -Tc
> added interface ip=172.16.1.3 bcast=172.16.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
> Segmentation fault
>
> This happened when out of curiosity, I wondered if
> it was possible to execute some smbcli
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Richard Bollinger wrote:
> Looks like most recent change to rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c includes a structure
>initializer just a
> bit too fancy for Sun's compiler... On sparc-sun-solaris2.8 using cc: WorkShop
>Compilers 5.0
> 98/12/15 C 5.0, I get following build failures f
Looks like most recent change to rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c includes a structure
initializer just a
bit too fancy for Sun's compiler... On sparc-sun-solaris2.8 using cc: WorkShop
Compilers 5.0
98/12/15 C 5.0, I get following build failures from today's 2_2 CVS:
Compiling rpc_parse/parse_spoolss
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Travis Freeland wrote:
> In order to get samba 2.2.4 working correctly under solaris (where we
> rely heavily on NIS unix groups) I had to make a couple of changes to
> username.c (basically take it back to the 2.0 style unix group checking
> code .. and take out the winbi
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to add an additional flag to both name_query and
> node_status_query.
>
> This flag will return the value of the Recursion Available flag in the
> nmb packet header.
>
> I am sure some people will find it useful.
>
> Any obje
please can you avoid sending html formatted email and proprietary
unreadable documents on this list?
plain text mails and text documents are the best way if you want people
to take care of your requests.
Simo.
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 13:15, MAKRO BADILLA TAMSI, Abigail wrote:
> > <>
> > Hi! I h
Mike Gerdts wrote:
>
> I have just started testing of winbindd, to make it so that NT users may
> or may not have UNIX accounts. I have run into two problems. I am
> fishing for solutions that work for me and others.
>
> 1. UNIX UID/GID assigment
>
> The incremental UNIX UID and GID assigmen
> We're using Redhat Linux 6.2 and Samba 2.0.7 for our file server. It is driven
>by an Intel Pentium III 900Mhz processor, 128MB PC133 DIMM, and RAID1 (40GB 5400rpm
>IDE). We have an average of 30-40 active connections. Users workstation is mostly
>Intel Pentium III 900Mhz with 128MB m
Title: Make error found in Samba 2.2.2
<>
Hi! I hope you could help me with the make fatal error which I received. Attached is the document listing the errors found during the end of the make command. Due to this the make install command also produces the same error.
I installed Samba 2.2.2
Yes, I am using 2.2.4 that I got from ftp site a week ago and that was
released May 2, 2002.
Will get the latest CVS.
Tian.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Sharpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tian-xiong Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Gerald Carter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
41 matches
Mail list logo
