strupper() on username and domain in cli_session_setup_nt1()?

I'm just wondering whether it is strictly necessary to uppercase the username and domain name when performing a session setup. Applying the following patch should not break anything and would make smbclient be able to test for case sensitivity bugs in the remote server. The behaviour of

Re: SID changes for a PDC when you change its name ...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If you change the server name of a PDC, Samba generates a new machine SID because of an incorrect test in pdb_generate_sam_sid. I stumbled across that one as well. Jerry had some reason for it, which I don't remember. Secondly, it would be nice

Re: SID changes for a PDC when you change its name ...

On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If you change the server name of a PDC, Samba generates a new machine SID because of an incorrect test in pdb_generate_sam_sid. I stumbled across that one as well. Jerry had some reason for it,

SAM_ADS first steps...002

Hi Kai,Andrew and Jelmer, I just uploaded my sam_ads module to sourceforge http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/mx-plugins/sam_ads/ metze - Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: strupper() on username and domain in cli_session_setup_nt1()?

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:30:28AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Tim Potter wrote: I'm just wondering whether it is strictly necessary to uppercase the username and domain name when performing a session setup. Applying the following patch should not break anything

Obeying primary group in /etc/passwd ?

Hi! What do you think about the following patch? More consistent would be to remove the group_sid from SAM_ACCOUNT completely, as we can always get this from /etc/passwd. Volker Index: pdb_get_set.c === RCS file:

approaching release of 3.0alpha20

Everyone, I would like to do another alpha snapshot release of the 3.0 code base later this week. Does anyone know of any code that is too unstable for a release (seg faults, etc...)? My plans are to begin actively maintaining the SAMBA_3_0 branch following this release. cheers, jerry

windbind passwd authentication on irix

Hi I have a win2k server and an octane and I like to use windbind to take care of all user authentication from users on the win2kserver domain MBDOMAIN. I'm using samba2.2.6pre2 mortenb, skrue and donald are all users that is working fine in the domain with windows clients. octane 96# su -

Re: approaching release of 3.0alpha20

I would like to do another alpha snapshot release of the 3.0 code base later this week. Does anyone know of any code that is too unstable for a release (seg faults, etc...)? I have not heard of any reports of FreeBSD users having any problems, but I am also not sure how many people use

Re: windbind passwd authentication on irix

On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Morten Bjørnsvik wrote: Any help greatly appreciated, since I need to implement this config at a large customer site later on. Morton, this is a development list. Please repost to the main samba mailing list. cheers, jerry

Re: approaching release of 3.0alpha20

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:01:53AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: Everyone, I would like to do another alpha snapshot release of the 3.0 code base later this week. Does anyone know of any code that is too unstable for a release (seg faults, etc...)? I've noticed just a few segfaults in

SAMBA PDC logon profiles

Hi All, I have been using SMABA 2.2.1a as PDC. For a normal user i.e a logon user in client the profiles remains same for windows NT. Whatever i set IE settings and desktop folders etc etc. But for windows 2000 and windows XP every time it asks for IE settings and folders get erased from

Re: approaching release of 3.0alpha20

On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:01:53AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: Everyone, I would like to do another alpha snapshot release of the 3.0 code base later this week. Does anyone know of any code that is too unstable for a release (seg faults,

Re: approaching release of 3.0alpha20

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 04:15:21AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote about 'Re: approaching release of 3.0alpha20': On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: I would like to do another alpha snapshot release of the 3.0 code base later this week. Does anyone know of any code that is too

Re: approaching release of 3.0alpha20

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 04:15:21AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote: On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:01:53AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: Everyone, I would like to do another alpha snapshot release of the 3.0 code base later this week. Does

Re: approaching release of 3.0alpha20

On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Rafal Szczesniak wrote: I've noticed just a few segfaults in utils like smbpasswd or net. I don't remember now, where exactly, but I can look for it. Other than that, I see no serious issues. OK. Good. What I'm looking for anyone to scream, No! I'm halfway through a

Re: Patch for winbindd memory leaks

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:14:34PM +0200, Kim R. Pedersen wrote: Hello Winbindd-Fans, During my port of winbindd to my company's new platform, I have come across three memory leaks in winbindd. They are all related to misconfigured password server parameter, and therefore not critical

compilation and sco 5.0.6 and winbind for samba 3.x

Are there any specials steps need to get winbind working in sco? I tried to compile with its cc and with gcc (have to use their ld because gnu ld will not compile on sco). compiling nsswitch/winbind_nss.c with Compiling nsswitch/wb_common.c with Linking nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so relocations

sco openserver 5.0.6 and winbindd compilation problem

I did not see any information on this, but it is in relation to build failure (sigh, is it because gnu ld does not work on sco openserver?). Does winbind not work on sco? I used the following script to build after cvs head download: #!/bin/ksh cd /usr/local/samba/source /usr/local/bin/make

Re: strupper() on username and domain in cli_session_setup_nt1()?

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 05:07:14PM +1000, Tim Potter wrote: I'm just wondering whether it is strictly necessary to uppercase the username and domain name when performing a session setup. Applying the following patch should not break anything and would make smbclient be able to test for case

Username nobody is invalid on this system in log files

Anyone know what is causing this, and how I can keep it from cluttering up my log files? Username nobody is invalid on this system [2002/09/23 13:51:22, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(1079) Username nobody is invalid on this system Thanks Josh Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: More mods to net {set,get}localsid ...

On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:25:53AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote: While Volker has written the command net {get,set}localsid, it would be nice if it could do the following: net getlocalsid name and net setlocalsid name=SID Sounds good - can you make the name part optional and

Re: approaching release of 3.0alpha20

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:01:53AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: Everyone, I would like to do another alpha snapshot release of the 3.0 code base later this week. Does anyone know of any code that is too unstable for a release (seg faults, etc...)? Apparently we ignore non-primary groups

Re: Username nobody is invalid on this system in log files

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 02:01:26PM -0700, Josh Brown wrote: Anyone know what is causing this, and how I can keep it from cluttering up my log files? Username nobody is invalid on this system You seem not to have such user in /etc/passwd. It is account used in anonymous connections.