I just got RH 8.0 up and running under VMWare. I'll try to get the samba.src.rpm
to build tomorrow. (2:45 A.M. is just a bit too late to start it tonight.)
mtew
HISTORY
I've had a little bit of a dilemma ever since Windows XP SP1 came
out - roaming profiles that are stored on a Samba server broke. They
also broke earlier when Windows 2000 SP2 was released, but was fixed by
adding 'nt acl support = no' in the profile's definition. This option
(
am curious and need to configure this and test, any ideas how to make it
work, i mean how do start 2 smbd parent process
is it port based or something else
samba technical group please comment on this if you get chance
thanks in advance
-Original Message-
From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi,
I share an XFS-volume via samba 2.2.4.
fetching the acls works like the following for me:
hermes:/secrets # smbcacls //hermes/xfs-share test -U TOGO/hzbogdan
Password:
REVISION:1
OWNER:TOGO\hzbogdan
GROUP:TOGO\users
ACL:TOGO\hzbogdan
Arrrggg!!
Smile =)
After upgrading from Samba 2.2.3a to 2.999+3.0cvs20 I'm experiencing the
following problem:
When a user logs on they get a message from windows that says the
following:
"Your Roaming profile is not available"
Then it says
"Windows cannot find th
Hi,
I write script Python for use on preexec and postexec.
On share netlogon, i have a preexec and postexec. Preexec add on .db file
user "%u", and IP "%I" on logon, and postexec remove this keys on .db
file.
On share netlogon i have the "root preexec close = yes".
When user log, the script a
I imagine those who favor the use of libsmbclient might be interested to
know that the header files are currently in disarray. I've verified that
this is also a problem in 3.0alpha20.
Should libsmbclient.h duplicate the functionality of client.h, or does
client.h need to be pulled in as a depend
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:25:39PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> I've seen Volker's patches, and I think that passdb can be made to work
> for the needs of 3.0, but it is messy. I believe the code as it
> *currently stands* can support 'net rpc vampire', but will consult
> volker more closel
Ignacio Coupeau wrote:
> I'm been playing with the groups and LDAP (passdb backend) and found two
> problems:
>
I found the answer.
The problem was caused by "unknow type" in the group type field.
By default the builtin-domain and every new group created is marked as
"Group type: Unknown type
Hello all,
I'm including a "tiny patch" for utils/status.c , in
diff -u format ... Hope I did this right!
After applying the patch...
# ./bin/smbstatus -P
{snip}
read_bytes: 0
write_count:1
write_time: 166
write_bytes:
jerry,
Finally got a chance to try upgrade and 3.0alpha20 does resolve the
problemThanks,
chuck
Gerald Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/30/2002 08:58:09 AM
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Server name being truncated in Winbindd
On Thu, 26 Sep 200
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Marcus Grando wrote:
> >
> > Hi list,
> >
> > How prevent user log many times on different machines?
> >
> > Samba log connections? how read this information on samba?
>
> There is currently no internal mechinism for dealing with this, but a
> PA
Marcus Grando wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> How prevent user log many times on different machines?
>
> Samba log connections? how read this information on samba?
There is currently no internal mechinism for dealing with this, but a
PAM module might be able to construct a suitable solution.
(Then se
Hi list,
How prevent user log many times on different machines?
Samba log connections? how read this information on samba?
Regards
--
Marcus Grando
Tecnologia da Informação
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 12:34, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > It is all a question on how and where you use them.
^^
> Except that global variables are particularly nasty in C - we don't have
> an autoprototyper on them, and we can
Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 08:06, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Let just remove the multi-domain stuff for now and try
> > > and get 3.0 in a shippable state.
> >
> > The 'new SAM' stuff is not being proposed for 3.0! Certainly not yet,
> > we have a
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 08:47, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Well it's not being used really, as it's not in a production
> > release. We don't make guarentees until it gets into a production
> > release. What "non-passdb" users are being mapped into the system
> > via this m
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 08:06, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Let just remove the multi-domain stuff for now and try
> > and get 3.0 in a shippable state.
>
> The 'new SAM' stuff is not being proposed for 3.0! Certainly not yet,
> we have a *lot* of work to do, before it get
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:34:47PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote about 'Re: [PATCH]
>sam backend parameter':
> > There is no intention to create a similar backend for the sam. Instead,
> > we do intend to solve this problem in exactly the way you indicate
> > below. T
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 07:22, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 12:16:53AM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote about 'Re: [PATCH] sam
>backend parameter':
> > yes a thing I'm not sure has ever been a good idea.
> > to be able to have sam2sam that is really read a backend + store all
> > info in
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:34:47PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote about 'Re: [PATCH] sam
backend parameter':
> There is no intention to create a similar backend for the sam. Instead,
> we do intend to solve this problem in exactly the way you indicate
> below. There is no intention to provide a '
Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 03:01, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > > Plus I have some questions about the current sam interface:
> > >
> > > - what is all the context thing needed for?
> >
> > I don't like global variables, and this allows us to construct sepe
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 03:13, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
>
> > It's getting clear that you are reinventing something we already have.
> > All your SAM api is simply the SAMR server pipe code. Why do you want to
> > implement a new api as we already have one ?
>
> I ha
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 03:01, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > Plus I have some questions about the current sam interface:
> >
> > - what is all the context thing needed for?
>
> I don't like global variables, and this allows us to construct seperate
> contexts for operations lik
Anyone
? Please ?
-Original Message-From: Nir Livni
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002
12:33 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
fsp->modified - What's it for ?
I am using samba-2.2.1a
I was wondering what is the usage of
the field fsp->modifi
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 06:15:01AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about 'Re: [PATCH]
sam backend parameter':
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 04:06:37PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > The use of multiple backends in passdb has acknowledged issues, and I'm
> > not particularly fussed if you feel it sh
26 matches
Mail list logo
