A registry editor taking shape ...

2002-12-09 Thread Richard Sharpe
Hi, A registry editor, editreg, is slowly taking shape in Samba-head. The goal is to be able to do things like: - delete keys and values - add keys and values - change keys and values - Change the SIDS/SecDescs applied to keys. - write out the changes tree - create a tree from scratch

Re: A registry editor taking shape ...

2002-12-09 Thread Simo Sorce
On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 10:56, Richard Sharpe wrote: Hi, A registry editor, editreg, is slowly taking shape in Samba-head. The goal is to be able to do things like: - delete keys and values - add keys and values - change keys and values - Change the SIDS/SecDescs applied to keys.

Re: A registry editor taking shape ...

2002-12-09 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Simo Sorce wrote: On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 10:56, Richard Sharpe wrote: Hi, A registry editor, editreg, is slowly taking shape in Samba-head. The goal is to be able to do things like: - delete keys and values - add keys and values - change keys and

Re: STAT_ST_BLOCKSIZE on HP-UX

2002-12-09 Thread Michael Steffens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It remained on 8192 for HP-UX (which is the number given by st_blksize) and which seems to be just as wrong there. The correct unit of st_blocks is 1024, instead. I got this value from the HPUX team (who site near me in Cupertino) but I'll check again I first

RE: A registry editor taking shape ...

2002-12-09 Thread Ulf Bertilsson
Hi, A registry editor, editreg, is slowly taking shape in Samba-head. Goodie ;) The goal is to be able to do things like: - delete keys and values - add keys and values - change keys and values - Change the SIDS/SecDescs applied to keys. - write out the changes tree - create

a very small fix for python

2002-12-09 Thread Guenther Deschner
hello everybody, make python_ext in HEAD is broken... bye, guenther -- Guenther Deschner [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux AGGnuPG: 8EE11688 Berliner Str. 27 phone: +49 (0) 30 / 430944778 D-13507

Unique printjob name

2002-12-09 Thread Tobias . Gerndt
Hi, we got a printjob problem with samba V2.2.7 and citrix terminal services (i.e. metaframe). Each printjob from the metaframe server spooled on the samba server has got one of the following ids: -rwx-- 1 nobody nogroup864256 May 21 13:10 CitrixICARemoteJob -rwx--

Re: STAT_ST_BLOCKSIZE on HP-UX

2002-12-09 Thread Herb Lewis
DEV_BSIZE is also correct for IRIX Michael Steffens wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It remained on 8192 for HP-UX (which is the number given by st_blksize) and which seems to be just as wrong there. The correct unit of st_blocks is 1024, instead. I got this value from the HPUX team

RE: A registry editor taking shape ...

2002-12-09 Thread MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
Hi Richard, Command line would be good, to allow add/delete/modify/list commands to a unique path to a key/value combo for batch purposes. It would also be nice to have an 'interactive mode, that would allow you to traverse the registry like a file system, so you could 'cd' into a particular

Re: Unique printjob name

2002-12-09 Thread Emil Isberg
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Everything we tried with a global pre-/postexec or workaround with print command failed ... :-( How about doing a wrapper shellscript instead? prompt$ cat /usr/local/bin/sambalpr #! /bin/bash MYDIR=/var/spool/samba/printdir$RANDOM #Preexec mkdir -p

Owner job in a cups printer whithin samba

2002-12-09 Thread Artabros
I've a printer installed with Cups and configured as a Raw Printer. I share it with other windows-system computers through Samba. The owner's job is the samba user. Is it possible to change it for its Netbios Name? I've seen the samba source and though i found the variable sent to cups (domain

fix for PR#26135, smbmount doesnt return exit codes after daemonizing (v2.2.7)

2002-12-09 Thread Scott Hammond
Hi, I went ahead and fixed my own bug report, #26135. smbmount.c doesnt return exit codes correctly after it daemonizes. Most errors occur from simple things, wrong password, cant connect, etc, so echo $? after the smbmount command returns 1. However if smbmnt fails (which is called after

NetBEUI as main protocol

2002-12-09 Thread Jason Hihn
I've a need for Samba to work over NetBEUI. We have a file server here that only speaks that way to bar out TCP-based hackers, and now I need to move files between hat and the Linux box. Changing it to use TCP is out of my authority too. I've scoured the archives, and the most I could come up

Re: NetBEUI as main protocol

2002-12-09 Thread John E. Malmberg
Jason Hihn wrote: I've a need for Samba to work over NetBEUI. We have a file server here that only speaks that way to bar out TCP-based hackers, There is a popular misconception that you can use NetBeui in this way. There is no security advantage in use NetBEUI in this manor. It is just as

Re: Bug in reply_write_and_X?

2002-12-09 Thread Conrad Minshall
At 10:36 AM -0800 12/7/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 01:42:18AM -0800, Conrad Minshall wrote: The server's local filesystem has a maximum filesize of 16 Terabytes. If my client attempts a writex with an offset of exactly 16TB then I see ERRnoaccess The code

Re: Bug in reply_write_and_X?

2002-12-09 Thread jra
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 08:10:00PM -0800, Conrad Minshall wrote: A local filesystem has to return EFBIG to Samba (per POSIX write system call def'n) and in the Samba source I'm looking at EFBIG isn't used anywhere relevant to a WRITE_ANDX, in particular it isn't in the unix_dos_nt_errmap

Re: NetBEUI as main protocol

2002-12-09 Thread Jim Morris
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 02:06 PM, Jason Hihn wrote: I am wondering if SAMBA can go over NetBEUI yet? I realize I'll probably have to re-compile my kernel (easy enough), but what if anything has to be done on the SAMBA side? Microsoft themselves have deprecated the NETBEUI protocol,

Re: NetBEUI as main protocol

2002-12-09 Thread Marty Leisner
I'm aware of someone hacked up samba years ago to run netbeui on freebsd... I looked at the samba code about 8 years ago for work with the idea of being able to run netbeui -- I was impressed someone got it to work -- tcp was more heavily embedded in stuff then I would have wanted to see (not

Re: serious problem with W2K TS and 2.2.7 PDC

2002-12-09 Thread Tomoki AONO
(samba-technical is developer-related, so I added Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RedHat 7.3 PDC server with samba 2.2.7 rpm rebuilt with max connections patch and ldapsam and a few other minor changes, openldap 2.0.23-4. Windows 2000 Terminal

Re: serious problem with W2K TS and 2.2.7 PDC

2002-12-09 Thread Robert Stuart
Tomoki AONO wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RedHat 7.3 PDC server with samba 2.2.7 rpm rebuilt with max connections patch and ldapsam and a few other minor changes, openldap 2.0.23-4. Windows 2000 Terminal Server with SP3, with various pre SP4 updates too.

Re: A registry editor taking shape ...

2002-12-09 Thread Dan Kegel
FYI. Original Message Subject: Re: [Fwd: A registry editor taking shape ...] Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 21:03:14 -0800 (PST) From: Steven Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED], wine-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED] The ReactOS project has a fully working console registry

Re: A registry editor taking shape ...

2002-12-09 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Dan Kegel wrote: FYI. Thanks. That is interesting. The GPL is not an issue. One of the items some want more than others is command-line tools that can be used to script conversions when copying profiles etc. However, others want an interactive too. If noting else, it