RE: Samba, nmblookup, wrong bcast address?

2002-12-17 Thread Esh, Andrew
Title: RE: Samba, nmblookup, wrong bcast address? Your net mask is wrong. You state that it's set to 255.255.255.xxx, but the debug output shows 255.255.-225-.xxx. nmblookup is broadcasting to the wrong network. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Re: pdbedit segfaults in SAMBA_3_0

2002-12-17 Thread Bradley W. Langhorst
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 04:06, Simo Sorce wrote: Can you send a backtrace? Mine does not segfault (tough I'm using head not 3.0) Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x400f43b0 in strdup () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x400f43b0 in strdup () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x0805caba

extracting SID from user profile

2002-12-17 Thread Bradley W. Langhorst
I accidentally wiped out my /etc/samba directory during an upgrade so I restored from a backup which had a MACHINE.SID in it. now i've changed my domain SID and everything is funky. logins work but permissions are all screwed up. So i want to figure out what my SID was before the restore and

workgroup parameter missing from swat in a21

2002-12-17 Thread Bradley W. Langhorst
what happened to the workgroup parameter from a21's swat? is this intentionally missing or is it a bug? brad -- Bradley W. Langhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: workgroup parameter missing from swat in a21

2002-12-17 Thread John H Terpstra
Brad, It should be there. I checked the code and it is still flagged to be on all global screens (Basic,Advanced,Developer). I'll check into this further later. - John T. On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote: what happened to the workgroup parameter from a21's swat? is this

Samba Win 98 Client requested max send size of 2920

2002-12-17 Thread Heric Holmes
We are having a problem with our samba server not transfering files on a mapped share on Windows 98 that are larger than 2920kb. WE cannot upload them to the Server but we can download off the server. We can send files into the network neighbourhood and the Samba server works fine. I upgraded

Re: editreg command files

2002-12-17 Thread John H Terpstra
Richard, This sounds good to me. Suggest we stick with REGEDIT4 as the version info for now just so as NOT to confuse anyone (or any M$ thing). - John T. On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote: Hi, Having thought about this issue a little more, I propose using a format similar to

Re: editreg command files

2002-12-17 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, John H Terpstra wrote: Richard, This sounds good to me. Suggest we stick with REGEDIT4 as the version info for now just so as NOT to confuse anyone (or any M$ thing). I can't. I need to have an additional file type so we can handle REGEDIT4 files, but we also need

Can't get 'net' to access AD server.

2002-12-17 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
I'm doing something stupid and need to be hit with a cluebat. I'm trying to use the 'net' command to access an AD server. I'm getting this error: ADS support not compiled in ...but I ran configure with the --with-ads directive just to be sure. Has anyone run across this? Chris -)- --

RE: Can't get 'net' to access AD server.

2002-12-17 Thread James Willard
I received the same message when initially trying to get ADS support running and it turned out to be that Samba's configure script couldn't automatically find my LDAP libraries, so I had to specify the location manually. One way to check if it's finding the proper libraries is to look in

Bug and Fix (Browse Lists)

2002-12-17 Thread Matt Roberts, GRDA
Developers, First, please accept my thanks for a really great product. I use Samba extensively and really enjoy it. I am testing the 3.0a21 for evaluation for later use in our shop and I have found what appears to be a minor bug, and a fix that works for me. I can't find it documented

Re: Bug and Fix (Browse Lists)

2002-12-17 Thread Tim Potter
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 08:24:18PM -0600, Matt Roberts, GRDA wrote: First, please accept my thanks for a really great product. I use Samba extensively and really enjoy it. I'm glad you enjoy Samba so much. (-: [...] In the NMBd debug output (nmbd run with -d 255), I find this excerpt:

Bug and Fix - Follow Up

2002-12-17 Thread Matt Roberts, GRDA
Developers, In my search for the cause of the behavior seen in my earlier post, I traced the function call path to these two interesting functions, int source/lib/util.c at about line 133: BOOL set_global_scope(const char *scope) { SAFE_FREE(smb_scope); smb_scope =