here you are:
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
spoolss_io_devmode: please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
[2003/01/08
http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-2_2-howto.html#patches
Tested the rebind stuff with ldap in round robin (master/slave)
Some fixes
Tar and diff -uRn textfiles available:
http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/patches-ldap.tar
http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/patches-ldap/
As two of the
Hi Andrew,
can you please apply the samstrict_dc only patch.
people who need this can set the 'auth method' paramter
and the current behavior isn't changed now.
I attached a patch for HEAD and one for 3_0
thanks :-)
metze
Umm, what OS? What version of Samba? Who/what is the client (Windows
version xyz?) What were the clients doing to make this happen? (if you
know)... Can you make a test case?
Thanks
PG
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13,
Server:
Linux xylophon 2.4.19-64GB-SMP #1 SMP Fri Sep 13 13:15:53 UTC 2002 i686
unknown
smbd -V
Version 2.2.7a-SuSE
Clients:
Windows 2000
On 13.01.2003 14:40:55 Green, Paul wrote:
Umm, what OS? What version of Samba? Who/what is the client (Windows
version xyz?) What were the clients doing
-Original Message-
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Virus scanners and any other automatic responders should
never send out
messages to mailing lists.
In my own mail filters, the way I've been doing this is to never
auto-respond to a message set Precendence:
Hello!
I am running a Samba 2.2.5 Server with winbind and acl support on a SuSE Linux
8.1 (Kernel 2.4.19) box. I have a problem with saving and reopening Files
from a Windows2000 client with Word and Excel. The Files do not belong to the
editing user even though he should have the rights to save
Hello,
I'm experiencing problems with compiling the libsmbclient examples (as
well as my own libsmbclient test programs). It seems like there are some
problems with the include files, as I get following errors:
gcc -I../../source/include -c -o testsmbc.o testsmbc.c
In file included from
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tuomas Niinimäki wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing problems with compiling the libsmbclient examples (as
well as my own libsmbclient test programs). It seems like there are some
problems with the include files, as I get following errors:
gcc -I../../source/include -c
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 21:01, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Which version of Samba are you using?
Hmm, version seems to be samba-2.999+3.0.alpha21, actually this is
source package from unstable debian. Perhaps I should try something
earlier and more stable :)
--
Tuomas Niinimäki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tuomas Niinimäki wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 21:01, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Which version of Samba are you using?
Hmm, version seems to be samba-2.999+3.0.alpha21, actually this is
source package from unstable debian. Perhaps I should try something
earlier and more
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Tuomas Niinimäki wrote:
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 21:01, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Which version of Samba are you using?
Hmm, version seems to be samba-2.999+3.0.alpha21, actually this is
source package from unstable debian. Perhaps I should try something
earlier and more
Jeremy,
I'm having problems with change notification in Samba 2.2.x under Linux
since you changed the signal
handling stuff some time ago.
An application I'm using always complains about missing change
notification, although it used to work.
I always failed to find out what's wrong, but now I
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:06:46PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
Jeremy,
I'm having problems with change notification in Samba 2.2.x under Linux
since you changed the signal
handling stuff some time ago.
An application I'm using always complains about missing change
notification, although
Below is my test program, nothing special:
/* test change notification */
#include windows.h
#include stdio.h
int main()
{
DWORD dwWaitStatus;
HANDLE dwChangeHandles[1];
dwChangeHandles[0] = FindFirstChangeNotification(
i:\\TEST, // directory to watch
FALSE,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 11:39:27PM +0100, Juergen Hasch wrote:
Can you give me more details please about where smbd is missing
the signal ? smbd should not be able to miss these signals, as
all they do is set a flag that is then processed inline in the
main loop.
Please give me more
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:40:55AM -0500, Green, Paul wrote:
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0] rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(608)
David Brodbeck wrote:
From: John E. Malmberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Virus scanners and any other automatic responders should
never send out messages to mailing lists.
In my own mail filters, the way I've been doing this is to never
auto-respond to a message set Precendence: bulk or
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:07:50PM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
Hi Jerry,
I noticed that if I'm using MS Access 97 on a NT4 machine I can't access to
database files witch are in directories 12 chars, but if I do the same
thing on an w2k or NT4 server is works.
I see that the
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 05:25:20PM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 01:11:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:31:48PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
Here's my idea for fixing this in appliance-head, without reworking
the mutex reference count.
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 01:11:14AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 05:31:48PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
Here's my idea for fixing this in appliance-head, without reworking
the mutex reference count.
Thanks for that - I've just checked in something close to this.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if I'm understanding you correctly this is actually a kernel
bug - correct ?
Can you point me at the areas in the kernel source where the problem
occurs so I can see how to make smbd work around it until we get the
kernel fixed.
No it's Samba receiving a signal
On 13.01.2003 23:36:08 Tim Potter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 08:40:55AM -0500, Green, Paul wrote:
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0]
rpc_parse/parse_spoolss.c:spoolss_io_devmode(607)
spoolss_io_devmode: Unknown specversion in devicemode [0x0]
[2003/01/08 08:26:20, 0]
23 matches
Mail list logo
