Re: Will these patches make it into 2.2.8?

2003-02-02 Thread Michael Steffens
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They are in my inbox queue of things to merge. I have to work on HP printing bugs as my 'day' job priority, but I have not forgotten these and will ensure they get added before 2.2.8 But probably not for 2.2.8pre1.

Re: heimdal didn't have AP_OPTS_USE_SUBKEY

2003-02-02 Thread Luke Howard
Sorry, the previously posted patch was needlessly complicated. The attached patch just contains the Kerberos-related stuff. -- Luke Index: configure.in === RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/configure.in,v retrieving revision 1.397

Re: REPOST: Meaning of tdb_free: left read failed at ...?

2003-02-02 Thread Simo Sorce
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 15:58, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 14:47:11 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote: you can try to delete unexpected.tdb it does not hold any vital information. The problem has reappeared even after I removed the above file: Feb 2 11:18:29 Fileserver

Re: REPOST: Meaning of tdb_free: left read failed at ...?

2003-02-02 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:44:18 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote: On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 15:58, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote: On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 14:47:11 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote: you can try to delete unexpected.tdb it does not hold any vital information. The problem has reappeared even after I removed

RE: Drive already connected Error in Windows 2000

2003-02-02 Thread Steve Hardy
are you sure you haven't just broken your net use /persistent:no w2k reconnects your drives as they were last time by default. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] a.org]Name ns Green, Paul Verzonden: Sunday, February 02, 2003 4:46 PM Aan:

Re: improved dos attribute handling

2003-02-02 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Sorry. I'm not subscribed to this list so I could not preserve the reply-to header. Please Cc: me if you want me to know the mail. :) John E. Malmberg wrote: Ola Lundqvist wrote: Hello again. This is the next issue for which I have created a patch. There is a problem with the current dos

Re: HEAD and 3.0 configure broken

2003-02-02 Thread Brian Poole
Quoting Simo Sorce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from 2 February 2003: checking whether to build winbind... yes checking whether struct passwd has pw_comment... no checking whether struct passwd has pw_age... no checking for poptGetContext in -lpopt... no checking whether to use included popt... yes

any work going into remote registry service?

2003-02-02 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [please CC me, I'm not on the list] Hi all, using google, I found out that some time ago there was some code in samba-tng for remotely changing the registry via rpc's. Are there any plans to implement this in Samba (3?)? Did it work, would it be

Re: any work going into remote registry service?

2003-02-02 Thread Tim Potter
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:12:58AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: using google, I found out that some time ago there was some code in samba-tng for remotely changing the registry via rpc's. Are there any plans to implement this in Samba (3?)? Did it work, would it be possible to extract

Re: HEAD and 3.0 configure broken

2003-02-02 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 03:25:35PM -0500, Brian Poole wrote about 'Re: HEAD and 3.0 configure broken': Quoting Simo Sorce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from 2 February 2003: checking whether to build winbind... yes checking whether struct passwd has pw_comment... no checking whether struct passwd

RE: [Samba] RE: Winbind on HPUX11, Totally Stuck, Please Help

2003-02-02 Thread Miles Roper
Hi All, Thanks for your help, still no luck though. More info for you. with no debug statements in my /etc/pam.conf I get in sys log the following. Feb 2 14:43:02 coastdr pam_winbind[2832]: user 'traininguser' granted acces with debug turned on I get Feb 2 14:47:49 coastdr