Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are in my inbox queue of things to merge. I have to work on HP
printing bugs as my 'day' job priority, but I have not forgotten
these and will ensure they get added before 2.2.8
But probably not for 2.2.8pre1.
Sorry, the previously posted patch was needlessly complicated.
The attached patch just contains the Kerberos-related stuff.
-- Luke
Index: configure.in
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/configure.in,v
retrieving revision 1.397
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 15:58, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 14:47:11 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
you can try to delete unexpected.tdb
it does not hold any vital information.
The problem has reappeared even after I removed the above file:
Feb 2 11:18:29 Fileserver
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 15:44:18 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 15:58, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 14:47:11 +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
you can try to delete unexpected.tdb
it does not hold any vital information.
The problem has reappeared even after I removed
are you sure you haven't just broken your
net use /persistent:no
w2k reconnects your drives as they were last time by default.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a.org]Name
ns Green, Paul
Verzonden: Sunday, February 02, 2003 4:46 PM
Aan:
Sorry. I'm not subscribed to this list so I could not
preserve the reply-to header. Please Cc: me if you
want me to know the mail. :)
John E. Malmberg wrote:
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello again.
This is the next issue for which I have created a patch.
There is a problem with the current dos
Quoting Simo Sorce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from 2 February 2003:
checking whether to build winbind... yes
checking whether struct passwd has pw_comment... no
checking whether struct passwd has pw_age... no
checking for poptGetContext in -lpopt... no
checking whether to use included popt... yes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[please CC me, I'm not on the list]
Hi all,
using google, I found out that some time ago there was some code in
samba-tng for remotely changing the registry via rpc's.
Are there any plans to implement this in Samba (3?)?
Did it work, would it be
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 12:12:58AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
using google, I found out that some time ago there was some code in
samba-tng for remotely changing the registry via rpc's.
Are there any plans to implement this in Samba (3?)?
Did it work, would it be possible to extract
On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 03:25:35PM -0500, Brian Poole wrote about 'Re: HEAD and 3.0
configure broken':
Quoting Simo Sorce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from 2 February 2003:
checking whether to build winbind... yes
checking whether struct passwd has pw_comment... no
checking whether struct passwd
Hi All,
Thanks for your help, still no luck though. More info for you.
with no debug statements in my /etc/pam.conf I get in sys log the following.
Feb 2 14:43:02 coastdr pam_winbind[2832]: user 'traininguser' granted acces
with debug turned on I get
Feb 2 14:47:49 coastdr
11 matches
Mail list logo