Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
hello!
Sorry for late reply :-(
Here it is.
OK, I wasn't precise enough. I was actually looking for a packet trace
of the problem. You can obtain such with:
tcpdump -i eth0 -s 1500 -w somefile.cap
started before you try
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 11:00:24 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 10:17:34AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
Ok, now /var/run/samba is an ext3 filesystem -- and the problem is back
again. :-(
Thanks nevertheless. As one resort, could you try
use mmap = no
I guess I should
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:34:16 -0600 (CST), Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
What exactly does that mean? I compiled Samba with large file support.
Was this an error? I absolutely NEED large-file support. (To recap, this
is under Debian/GNU Linux/i386
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:21:15AM +0100, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
I guess I should have defined CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK when compiling my
kernel since I also configured Samba with --with-spinlocks:
Ok, this might explain it. Spinlocks are definitely a less tested part of the
code. I have
On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 11:50:50 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
[...]
you do not have a *very* good reason to enable them, could you please retry
without spinlocks?
Ok, I'm just recompiling Samba without spinlock support.
Obviously I have to wait until this night so that the fileserver becomes less
Maybe a dumb question, but...
libsmbclient.so is being built in bin, but nothing seems to be linking
to it. I tried make installclientlib, which installed it, but no
change.
Is there some trick to get it to be used? (NetBSD with SAMBA_3_0)
Thanks,
Ken
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:54:27AM -0500, Ken Cross wrote about 'Using shared
libraries?':
Maybe a dumb question, but...
libsmbclient.so is being built in bin, but nothing seems to be linking
to it. I tried make installclientlib, which installed it, but no
change.
Is there some trick to
Hi Jeremy,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn good idea ! I think I'll look into applying some version
of this - thanks !
Many thanks to you!
Our big boy unveiled another problem with winbind and a large
number of clients (most of them smbds, but also other processes,
of course): Winbindd becomes
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:54:27AM -0500, Ken Cross wrote about 'Using shared
libraries?':
Maybe a dumb question, but...
libsmbclient.so is being built in bin, but nothing seems to be linking
to it. I tried make installclientlib, which
I've encountered a strange error. I have samba 2.2.7 installed on
freebsd 4.7. I've run testparm on the smb.conf and don't see any
errors. I can connect to a service from a windows 2k machine using
standard net use commands.
HOWEVER, when I try to use smbclient from another machine to view
has anyone compiled a list of new config parms between samba 2.0.x and
2.2? AND has anyone made a list of parameters with different
semantics between the versions?
--
David Bear
College of Public Programs/ASU
Mail Code 0803
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, David Bear wrote:
I've encountered a strange error. I have samba 2.2.7 installed on
freebsd 4.7. I've run testparm on the smb.conf and don't see any
errors. I can connect to a service from a windows 2k machine using
standard net use commands.
HOWEVER, when I try to
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:57:10AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, David Bear wrote:
I've encountered a strange error. I have samba 2.2.7 installed on
freebsd 4.7. I've run testparm on the smb.conf and don't see any
errors. I can connect to a service from a windows 2k
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:57:10AM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, David Bear wrote:
I've encountered a strange error. I have samba 2.2.7 installed on
freebsd 4.7. I've run testparm on the smb.conf and don't see any
errors. I can connect to a service from a windows 2k
Pretty standard: -l smbclient
You may need -L libdir if not standard
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Jelmer Vernooij
Cc: Ken Cross; 'Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-TECHNICAL'
Subject: Re: Using
Hi!
I have an environment containing two NT4 domains, eg. DOM1 and DOM2.
DOM1 and DOM2 are trusted. There's a machine running Debian Woody, on
which I installed Samba, and made it to be a member of an NT4 domain
(DOM1) using Samba-howtos. I configured Samba to use Winbind for looking
up user
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:52:40PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 11:35:22AM -0700, David Bear wrote:
Are you sure that you are connecting to a Samba server, and not, say, a
Win2K server by some accident?
Yes, I thought that was strange as well, yet,
sorry to trouble the group on this one. The problem was twofold
1) in my smb.conf on machine at 120.183 I hand the entry dns proxy =
yes
AND
2) a very old and outdated DNS entry that needs to be removed.
whoa..
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:35:26PM -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Ken Cross wrote:
Pretty standard: -l smbclient
You may need -L libdir if not standard
OK, so I am confused right now. Weren't you the one that asked about this
in the first place?
Regards
-
Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org,
100% Money Back Guarantee!
Permanent Larger Erections
http://shaggweb.com/9inches/index.html
lhjr
cmwhhkb uamrt eihlebh pqkyjxt
azhuldwqzeo ijicoqyjjb ce tgjly
q
d
hlekx g qh
mczxrbg
uh
Sure, but my original question (which was answered) was whether Samba
used it. Apparently not.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Richard Sharpe
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:50 PM
To: Ken Cross
Cc: 'Ken Cross'; 'Jelmer
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Ken Cross wrote:
Sure, but my original question (which was answered) was whether Samba
used it. Apparently not.
Herb Huston committed some patches last week to at least head I think to
link Samba with libsmbclient, because someone else asked about this.
Herb observed
Hi all!
Attached patch can be seen as proposal to discuss behavior of gencache in
case when it is used in applications running under non-priviledged
accounts so that O_RDWR|O_CREAT always fails against system-wide
lock_path(gencache.tdb) (which is usually created by smbd/nmbd).
The patch adds
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 08:01:51PM +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
Hi all!
Attached patch can be seen as proposal to discuss behavior of gencache in
case when it is used in applications running under non-priviledged
accounts so that O_RDWR|O_CREAT always fails against system-wide
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:06:04AM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
Attached patch can be seen as proposal to discuss behavior of gencache in
case when it is used in applications running under non-priviledged
accounts so that O_RDWR|O_CREAT always fails against system-wide
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:10, Tim Potter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:06:04AM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
Attached patch can be seen as proposal to discuss behavior of gencache in
case when it is used in applications running under non-priviledged
accounts so that O_RDWR|O_CREAT
It seems that when I try to setup one-way non-transitive trust between W2K domain and Samba DOMAIN, Samba send some incorrect response, and W2K PDS domain manager displays message that incorrect parameter was specified.
There is nothing unusual in the log file, except that W2K is first trying to
Someone is kidnapping my mailaddress - and someone has an open smtp-server ...
Sorry, but there are always some kiddies out there with enough time for funny things.
100% Money Back Guarantee!
Permanent Larger Erections
http://shaggweb.com/?/index.html
lhjr
cmwhhkb uamrt eihlebh pqkyjxt
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 05:46:46PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 10:10, Tim Potter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 12:06:04AM +0100, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
Attached patch can be seen as proposal to discuss behavior of gencache in
case when it is used in
29 matches
Mail list logo
