Modules

090156 metze ctrlsoft: I think the modules stuff should not merged into 3_0 untill we have discused how module loading should be finally done in samba What I will be merging into 3_0 at first is just some basic helper functions for the modules. it's currently only the smb_load_module() function

Re: IDMAP backend

But I'm REALLY NOT FINE with a parameter name 'winbind backend' for this!!! winbind backends are RPC and ADS. we should name this parameter 'idmap backend' or something like that. please, please change this fast! :-) otherwise it will be bad to change this parameter because everyone has it

Re: IDMAP backend

On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 23:01, Jim McDonough wrote: But I'm REALLY NOT FINE with a parameter name 'winbind backend' for this!!! winbind backends are RPC and ADS. we should name this parameter 'idmap backend' or something like that. please, please change this fast! :-) otherwise it will

Need help !!

Hi, I´d like to ask you if it is possible to connect a Winxp cleint to a Linux Suse 6.4 with Samba 2.0.4 fileserver, when yes how. Several times I like to connect my WinXP client to the Fileserver and I can see him but I cannot the directories how does it comes ?? In advance thank you very

Re: Modules

At 11:43 21.02.2003 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: 090156 metze ctrlsoft: I think the modules stuff should not merged into 3_0 untill we have discused how module loading should be finally done in samba What I will be merging into 3_0 at first is just some basic helper functions for the modules.

Re: IDMAP backend

I agree, Stefan suggestions are good. Simo. On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 07:52, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote: Hi Jim, Anthony, It's nice to see that someone is working on the idmap backend stuff :-) But I'm REALLY NOT FINE with a parameter name 'winbind backend' for this!!! winbind backends

Re: IDMAP backend

So I've renamed the paramater to 'idmap backend', but I've left it in the nsswitch directory for the moment...since that will take some more effort and planning, and it seems we should have the apis better defined. Jim McDonough IBM Linux Technology Center Samba

Re: Samba on 2 domains?

On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 14:30, Keith Hamilton wrote: Hey, Is it possible to configure Samba to run as a PDC on 2 domains? Hi, I don't think so. I would try to run 2 sambas. Just put config stuff in different directories, add IP alias and bind sambas to different IPs. The only thing that

Input on tuning ?

http://www.birrabrothers.com/tiger/data/samba/showoff/ AmigaOS now broke the 1mb/s barrier ;D Any input on Ethereal SMB RTT values for tuning ? Doubling TCP window gave an 10-15% increase actualy. Bottleneck now is cpu peaking at 99% at ~1MB IO. FTP peak at 1.5MB/S. Have an wonderful CRC free

[patch] configure.in bug setting authlibs

AC_SEARCH_LIBS and AC_CHECK_LIB are used to find a function and then add its library to the LIBS variable. The macros can deal with the fact that the function might be missing, in a library, or available but not in any library. The configure script, in both head and 3.0, uses these macros to

Re: Samba on 2 domains?

On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Keith Hamilton wrote: Hey, Is it possible to configure Samba to run as a PDC on 2 domains? If you run two separate copies of Samba :-) Regards - Richard Sharpe, rsharpe[at]ns.aus.com, rsharpe[at]samba.org, sharpe[at]ethereal.com, http://www.richardsharpe.com

RE: Byte range locking

I observed it while running the following modified torture test: static BOOL run_locktest7(int dummy) { static struct cli_state cli1; const char *fname = \\lockt7.lck; int fnum1; BOOL ret; char buf[200]; BOOL correct = True; if

Re: Byte range locking

On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:51:10AM -0800, Srikanta Shivanna wrote: I observed it while running the following modified torture test: Thanks ! That saves me from writing one :-) :-). I'll look into it asap ! Jeremy.

win2000 server, linux client

hello everyone, im new in this list and i have this problem.. I have a win2000 domain controller in subnet 172.17.0.x and a linux server in 172.17.20.x (DHCP assign) The DC not solve the ip / netbiosname relation (A record i think..) like a win98 / NT /2000 If i ping the linux server from

RE: [patch] libsmbclient: shared or static libs, never both?

Steve Langasek [mailto:vorlon@xx] suggests: Sometimes, it's useful to be able to build (and install) static libraries even on platforms that support shared libraries. The attached patch brings in a few macros from libtool's aclocal.m4, to add --enable-shared and --enable-static

Win2K/XP, oplocks, and readahead

The readahead that the Linux page manager does (see mm/readahead.c) seems more sensible than what you are seeing with the Windows client - if you are trying to excercise your server in this way you might try the clients using the current version of Linux 2.5 kernel mounted with the cifs vfs or

Re: Win2K/XP, oplocks, and readahead

Hi there! Although I am most focused on Windows clients since that is what our customers use, this would be a great thing to try to attempt to exonerate samba (not that much suspicion lies there anyway :)). It would be an interesting data point. I can't believe that I can't find *any*

Re: Byte range locking

On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:51:10AM -0800, Srikanta Shivanna wrote: I observed it while running the following modified torture test: Great test. I've applied a modified version of it to smbtorture in HEAD and fixed the bug in Samba's locking implementation. Thanks ! Jeremy.