Jan Houstek wrote:
server:
linux 2.4.19 with xfs 1.2 and its ACL
libacl 2.0.19
samba 2.2.8 compiled from source with --with-acl-support
acting as PDC
interesting parts of smb.conf
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 08:11:35AM +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote about 'more
then one backend in one module':
HI Jelmer,
how do we handle *sam_nua modules and friends...
'ldapsam' and 'ldapsam_nua' are in pdb_ldap.c
'sam','samstrict' and 'samstrict_dc' are all in auth_sam.c
if
I really don't think that putting keytab code in to Samba is the right answer.
Do you really want to be in charge of modifying keytabs? This could get
quite complicate -- especially when you multiply the effort by the number of
possible encryption types...
I don't think it's that
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 22:36, Luke Howard wrote:
I really don't think that putting keytab code in to Samba is the right answer.
Do you really want to be in charge of modifying keytabs? This could get
quite complicate -- especially when you multiply the effort by the number of
possible
Hi all,
Sorry for posting this one here, I guess it is a bit out of topic,
But I tried about 4 or 5 other mailing lists - no luck yet.
I'm trying to configure my samba on a RedHat AS 2.1, to run in an
active-active configuration. The Red Hat Cluster Manager Installation and
Administration Guide
I agree that if Samba is changing the password for a particular kerberos
principal, then it should store the hashes in the keytab.
The idea of *finally* getting kerberos useful on real sites is just too
appealing :-)
Naturally, the original plaintext password should stay basically where
it
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 22:55, Luke Howard wrote:
I agree that if Samba is changing the password for a particular kerberos
principal, then it should store the hashes in the keytab.
The idea of *finally* getting kerberos useful on real sites is just too
appealing :-)
Naturally, the
Hi!
Compiling samba CVS with gcc 3.3 gives quite some
annoying warnings in proto.h because exp and log are
builtins. Attached is a patch that replaces exp with expr
and log with clog (didn't know a better name for it)
in the affected c files.
Please apply.
Greetings, Stephan
Index:
Would this be a better fix for the devicetype problem?
It looks like we are putting the strings into the buffer twice, and we
are not returning the 'fixed' devicetype for both protocol levels ( NT1
and NT1).
What happened here is that jermey 'fixed' a const warning. This meant
that this
From my RH 8 box I use smbmount to mount a share to \\windows2k\fileshare1
\\windows2k\fileshare1 . The mount point is created..
Now I want to use either chmod, or chown and change the file called
'testing.txt', no matter what I do I still get the error operation not
permitted.
My whole point
On March 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Can anyone tell me if this is possible and if so what actions I must take?
Not presently possible. The files remain owned by the user/group that
you used for the smbmount command.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
Does anyone know if this will be possible in future releases of samba?
Anyone have a work around?
Thanks again!
-Original Message-
From: Ronan Waide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:59 AM
To: Eisenstein, Doug
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Mounting to a
At 09:00 25.03.2003 -0500, Eisenstein, Doug wrote:
Does anyone know if this will be possible in future releases of samba?
Anyone have a work around?
you can use smbcacls to change the permisions on files/directories
metze
Does anyone know if this will be possible in future releases of samba?
It's not really a samba issue, it's an SMBFS issue. You may want to check
out the Linux CIFS VFS at http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
I'm not sure if this can do what you want yet, but you can contact the
Hi all,
here's a small fix that prevents us from segfaulting...
please apply this to all all branches witch are infected :-)
metze
-
Stefan metze Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smbcontrol.diff
Description: Binary data
Hi!
I noticed a difference between testsmbc smb://MYGRP and testsmbc smb://mygrp
(it doesn't make a difference for SAMBA servers, but it does for XP and for winME)
So please apply the included patch.
Greetings, Stephan
Index: libsmb/clirap.c
Michael Steffens wrote:
I could (almost) reproduce it on HP-UX, and (almost) fix it
using inherit acls = Yes. :)
Both almost refer to mask (or class, respectively) behaving
a bit strange. But this might be platform specific.
Yes. inherit acls = yes solves my problem. Thanks to all who
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:02:13PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Would this be a better fix for the devicetype problem?
It looks like we are putting the strings into the buffer twice, and we
are not returning the 'fixed' devicetype for both protocol levels ( NT1
and NT1).
What happened
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:43:18 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jan Houstek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Samba technical list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Problems with ACLs in
2.2.8 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; +0100
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type:
I'm trying to use some of the functions in winbind_nss.c in my winbind_aix.c
module. It compiles, but when I try to link it fill_pwent is unresolved.
What do I need to link against in order to get fill_pwent and such from
winbind_nss.c? I tried making nsswitch/winbind_nss.o and linking against
Hi!
I looked into the URL handling libsmbclient is doing and it's
lacking quite some of the stuff that the DRAFT specifies (and
some of the stuff that generally are required for URIs). Is
someone working on that?
I'm currently preparing some patches, but hate C programming
enough to dump it for
Still a work-in-progress, but this compiles and works as expected on AIX
5.1.
I haven't implemented getgrset yet, the NSS API is pretty different from AIX
in that case. It also needs a mechanism to allocate more memory when the
winbind response is larger than 4096 bytes. I had to copy
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 02:30:32PM -0800, Eric Horst wrote:
Hello! With great enthusiasm I upgraded from 2.2.7a to 2.2.8 last week
to get the critical security fix. However, it appears that msdfs is
broken in 2.2.8. Several on the 'samba' list have reported this as
well. Some say it
Hello,
I verified that when I use security=ads, the domain trusts work. But when
I use security=domain and join the w2k domain using net rpc join, I don't
see any trusted domain. I checked with wbinfo -m, wbinfo --sequence and
finally add ACL entries for a file served by samba.
I see that
Thanks Jeremy. Works much better now.
--Eric
Here is the fix for Samba 2.2.8 to make MS-DFS work again with WinXP.
(For once this wasn't my fault :-).
Sorry for the problem,
Jeremy.
Index: smbd/trans2.c
===
In today's CVS, I caught this message zip by while configuring:
...
checking net/if.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's
Am Tuesday 25 March 2003 21:46 schrieb Dave Collier-Brown:
In today's CVS, I caught this message zip by while configuring:
...
checking net/if.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?
Well, that's what I was saying I did. I first did just a 'make clean'
and rebuilt, but then I went further and did a 'make distclean',
followed by 'autoconf', './configure', and 'make'. Both ways result in
the compile error.
Thanks,
James
-Original Message-
From: Jelmer Vernooij
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 04:19:12PM -0500, James Willard wrote about 'RE: Compile error
in server.c':
Well, that's what I was saying I did. I first did just a 'make clean'
and rebuilt, but then I went further and did a 'make distclean',
followed by 'autoconf', './configure', and 'make'. Both
Yes I did that about an hour ago, but just to be absolutely sure I went
ahead and did the following again just about 2 minutes ago:
cvs update -d -P
cd source
make clean ./configure make
Then I received the error once again:
Compiling smbd/server.c
smbd/server.c: In function `main':
At 16:29 25.03.2003 -0500, James Willard wrote:
Yes I did that about an hour ago, but just to be absolutely sure I went
ahead and did the following again just about 2 minutes ago:
cvs update -d -P
cd source
make clean ./configure make
can you try:
cvs update -d -P
cd source
make distclean
rm
Ok, I think I've figured this out, but since I'm relatively new to
Samba internals I'm not entirely clear on how to fix it, or what I
might break with my fix.
In a large RPC call, such as an EnumPrinters 2 call with a big buffer,
the DCE/RPC stuff gets split into several SMB messages and tossed
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 01:58:49AM +, Ronan Waide wrote:
Ok, I think I've figured this out, but since I'm relatively new to
Samba internals I'm not entirely clear on how to fix it, or what I
might break with my fix.
In a large RPC call, such as an EnumPrinters 2 call with a big buffer,
Ahh.. Okay... That was the magic solution, running autogen.sh. I did not
realize that was also a necessary component to run.
On a side note, does anybody know when we can expect net ads password
to function without a segfault? It will be really cool to have that
feature.
Thanks,
James Willard
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 03:28, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Would this be a better fix for the devicetype problem?
I may be blind here, but the only difference in your patch that
I see is some
Hi!
Here's a patch that adds support to the VFS for the new modules
system. The only problem is that it breaks all current modules, but
I don't think I can do anything about that.
Any objections?
Jelmer
--
Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://nl.linux.org/~jelmer/
23:26:54 up 8 days,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I may be blind here, but the only difference in your patch that
I see is some rewritten debug messages. What am I overlooking?
The second half of the patch?
Ah...you mean adding the server_devicetype
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 09:28, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I may be blind here, but the only difference in your patch that
I see is some rewritten debug messages. What am I overlooking?
The
Maybe use the -A option to cvs update, to clear any sticky tags that might
be applied to your files. Such tags would prevent the latest code from being
downloaded.
-Original Message-
From: James Willard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 3:52 PM
To: 'Jelmer Vernooij'
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:37:33PM -0500, Roylance, Stephen D. wrote:
I'm trying to use some of the functions in winbind_nss.c in my winbind_aix.c
module. It compiles, but when I try to link it fill_pwent is unresolved.
What do I need to link against in order to get fill_pwent and such from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
And removing the second set of push_string()s. It looked like you had
some kind of merge error - your patch added new push_string() calls,
rather than modified the original push_string() lines.
Ahh...yes.
The fill_pwent function is static in winbind_nss.c You are probably
trying to call it directly from your winbind_aix.c which won't work.
Can winbind_aix.c be modelled like winbind_solaris.c? That is, wrapper
functions abstract out the vendor specific nss stuff which then call the
At 23:29 25.03.2003 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
I took Jelmer's patch and modifed it,
to support an easy way to have per connection default_vfs_ops
and per connection private data in the vfs modules
so every module registers and got a unique vfs module number for te current
smbd or vfstest
At 00:52 26.03.2003 +0100, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 23:29 25.03.2003 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
I took Jelmer's patch and modifed it,
to support an easy way to have per connection default_vfs_ops
and per connection private data in the vfs modules
so every module registers and got a
Does anyone know if this will be possible in future releases of samba?
It's not really a samba issue, it's an SMBFS issue. You may want to check
out the Linux CIFS VFS at
http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html
If unix extensions = yes in the smb.conf file on the Samba server, then
Righto, the background information is as follows:. --dave
uname -a
SunOS hobbes 5.8 Generic_108528-18 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1
Compiler:
gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
And the log entries were:
configure:4693: checking net/if.h usability
configure:4706: gcc -c -O -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
Folks
**
I am not on this alias. Could all relevent replies please be CC'ed to me
as well
**
I have configured and compiled samba 2.2.8 with gcc 2.95.3 on Solaris 9
using the options --with-automount.
When I try to use the command:
smbd -D -l /var/log/log.smbd
The log file is not created.
Samba 3.0, Line 1269 of web/swat.c references TRUE rather than the POSIX-ly
correct True. There may be others; this is the one that killed the build
on Stratus VOS. Would whoever checked in this change please correct it?
Many thanks.
PG
--
Paul Green, Senior Technical Consultant,
Stratus
Hello Jeff,
Jeff Mandel wrote:
As long as you're having a look, will you give a look at the mode
problem at file create time? In some cases samba over-rides the umask
and inherited acls and creates the file as r--r--r--. Only samba's force
create will kind of fix that. It's like the
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Green, Paul wrote:
Samba 3.0, Line 1269 of web/swat.c references TRUE rather than the POSIX-ly
correct True. There may be others; this is the one that killed the build
on Stratus VOS. Would whoever checked in this change please correct it?
Many thanks.
Done.
- John
Oh, that is just so annoying
This must have changed from 2.0.x to 2.2.x. It was logfile in 2.0.10 (what
I am upgrading from)...
Well, I feel like a goose now.That works so much better.
Thanks for the help
tony
--On Tuesday, March 25, 2003 09:46:16 PM -0500 Brian Poole
[EMAIL
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:02:58PM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
And removing the second set of push_string()s. It looked like you had
some kind of merge error - your patch added new
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:46:27PM -0500, Dave Collier-Brown wrote:
In today's CVS, I caught this message zip by while configuring:
...
checking net/if.h presence... yes
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: net/if.h: check for missing prerequisite
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 04:12:04PM -0500, James Willard wrote about 'Compile error in
server.c':
I'm getting an error when trying to compile the HEAD branch of Samba.
I've been following it in CVS since, well, since it was created. The
problem suddenly appeared about a week or two ago and I've
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:39:26 +0100
Stephan Kulow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I looked into the URL handling libsmbclient is doing and it's
lacking quite some of the stuff that the DRAFT specifies (and
some of the stuff that generally are required for URIs). Is
someone working on that?
autoconf isn't enough. Run autogen.sh (to ensure autoheader is run too).
Anthony Liguori
Linux/Active Directory Interoperability
Linux Technology Center (LTC) - IBM Austin
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (512) 838-1208
Tie Line: 678-1208
I promise you, I did everything that I said I did, including running
make clean, make distclean, cvs update -d -P, autoconf, and ./configure.
Is there something you would like for me to look at? My include/config.h
does not have that #define, despite having rm'd include/config.h and
running
57 matches
Mail list logo
