Re: tcon torture test

2003-03-30 Thread tridge
Ah. Bingo. So the context is based on the file handle. Makes sense. The same thing is true of the RPC handles for printing. given that win2003 seems to now restrict SMBwriteX to be on the 'correct' tid, it would be interesting to retest the RPC case with a win2003 server. Maybe they fixed

Re: [patch] uppercase workgroup in browse request

2003-03-30 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Thursday 27 March 2003 18:04 schrieb Christopher R. Hertel: On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 05:43:55PM +0100, Stephan Kulow wrote: Am Thursday 27 March 2003 03:43 schrieb Christopher R. Hertel: Stephan Kulow wrote: Hi! I noticed a difference between testsmbc smb://MYGRP and testsmbc

charset confusion

2003-03-30 Thread Stephan Kulow
Hi! I've done an experiment and configured my only windows system (german win98) in the LAN to be named häßlich and be in the workgroup möbel. Then tried testsmbc on smb://m%C3%B6bel/ (correctly UTF-8 escaped samba URL). That tried a broadcast for möbel1d, which I think it shouldn't. I'm not

[patch] Fix source/Makefile.in to clean up everything

2003-03-30 Thread Green, Paul
The everything target makes some additional files that are not cleaned-up by make clean. This patch corrects the oversight. It should be applied to both head and 3_0. Tested today by me on Stratus VOS. Thanks PG -- Paul Green, Senior Technical Consultant, Stratus Technologies, Maynard, MA USA

[patch] Fix samba_2_2 to build on Stratus VOS

2003-03-30 Thread Green, Paul
This patch back-ports Makefile.in and configure.in logic from head/3.0 to 2.2 so that Stratus VOS can build Samba 2.2 properly. I have tested it extensively on Stratus VOS without any problems (and of course it is tested frequently in the other trees). Please apply it to Samba 2.2. Thanks PG --

RE: [SECURITY] Samba 2.2.8 available for download

2003-03-30 Thread Green, Paul
Green, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The 2.2.8 release notes say: A buffer overrun condition exists in the SMB/CIFS packet fragment re-assembly code in smbd which would allow an attacker to cause smbd to overwrite arbitrary areas of memory in its own process address space. This

Re: charset confusion

2003-03-30 Thread Stephan Kulow
Am Sunday 30 March 2003 22:46 schrieb Stephan Kulow: Am Sunday 30 March 2003 20:37 schrieb Stephan Kulow: Hi! I've done an experiment and configured my only windows system (german win98) in the LAN to be named häßlich and be in the workgroup möbel. Then tried testsmbc on

status of unixsam and guest passdb backends?

2003-03-30 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew, I notice that the default for the passdb backend parameter has been changed in SAMBA_3_0/HEAD, but the man page has not been updated. Since it was passdb backend = unixsam that was breaking 'smbpasswd -a', I'm wondering is unixsam even

RE: [SECURITY] Samba 2.2.8 available for download

2003-03-30 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 06:12, Green, Paul wrote: Green, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The 2.2.8 release notes say: A buffer overrun condition exists in the SMB/CIFS packet fragment re-assembly code in smbd which would allow an attacker to cause smbd to overwrite arbitrary

Re: status of unixsam and guest passdb backends?

2003-03-30 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 08:48, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew, I notice that the default for the passdb backend parameter has been changed in SAMBA_3_0/HEAD, but the man page has not been updated. Since it was passdb backend =

Re: status of unixsam and guest passdb backends?

2003-03-30 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 09:48, Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 08:48, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew, I notice that the default for the passdb backend parameter has been changed in SAMBA_3_0/HEAD, but the man page has

ldapsam failure in 2.2.8 on OSX-10.2.4, yet working fine in 2.2.5

2003-03-30 Thread satadru
Background: I have a externally firewalled server running OS X Server, on which I have compiled samba 2.2.5 with ldapsam using the Makefile for samba on the Apple Public CVS servers (attached), since the version of Samba that comes with OS X Server does not have ldap support compiled in (Which

Re: status of unixsam and guest passdb backends?

2003-03-30 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote: Unixsam was a useful hack and a bad idea. Most of what it was trying to do it couldn't really do, and will be replaced by idmap. I had wanted all rid-uid translations to go via the passdb. However, we

Re: status of unixsam and guest passdb backends?

2003-03-30 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 10:10, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote: Unixsam was a useful hack and a bad idea. Most of what it was trying to do it couldn't really do, and will be replaced by idmap. I had

New modules system and vfs_done

2003-03-30 Thread Andrew Bartlett
As per my recent commit, the new (VFS) modules system completely breaks on tree disconnect! We need to separate the different cases - the compat and the central modules, and provide either a flag or a function pointer to the correct way to shut down a module. The code in conn_close is really in

Problems with ACL support in Samba 2.2.5 - 2.2.8

2003-03-30 Thread Johannes Tyve
Trying to add users using security tab i WinXP doesn't work for us, no users are added. Existing ACLs are possible to change and delete. This behavior has been identified with both Solaris 2.6, Linux 2.4.9-31 with XFS, Samba 2.2.5 and 2.2.8. I'm attaching global part of out smb.conf and a

Re: [patch] uppercase workgroup in browse request

2003-03-30 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 04:03:45PM +0200, Stephan Kulow wrote: : There's a question above. I asked Do I read this correctly?. You added a smiley behind it, so it appeared ironicly to me. It was just an attempt to appear friendly. So, what is your intention with this patch? What was the

Re: How to verify the domain secret is good or bad?

2003-03-30 Thread Joey Collins
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: [snip] Also, sometimes I saw problems like wbinfo -t just says secret is bad, when all the daemons were running. It sure was good at some point before. Samba periodially changes the password on the server. secrets.tdb should be in sync with this. Hi,