On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 08:20:17 +0100
Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We did reach an important conclusion that would be influential to anyone
> > writing an SMB URL parser. That is, even though SMB URLs do not require
> > Unicode characters be escaped (for practical reasons) they should
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:39:26 +0100
Stephan Kulow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I looked into the URL handling libsmbclient is doing and it's
> lacking quite some of the stuff that the DRAFT specifies (and
> some of the stuff that generally are required for URIs). Is
> someone working on th
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:07:43 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have not been able to find the block of code that will be called if an open
> connection receives an indication that the peer has "gone away"
> (i.e. shutdown, crashed, cable cut, etc.).
>
> More specifically, if I have an open, esta
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:03:02 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Hasch) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> attached is a modified version of Hal's file change notification patch.
> It's against Samba HEAD and works for me.
>
> Changes:
> - use push_ucs2() to send unicode file names
> - make some functions static (mak
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:30:44 -0800 (PST)
Richard Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Joey Collins wrote:
>
> > The SNIA definition of the data required for SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO
> > does not appear to be correct. Furthermore, Ethereal's interpretation
> > does not seem righ
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:35:32 +1100
Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Possibly only for long strings? But then that is probably
> > micro-optimization.
>
> If we really cared about optimizing this function, then we would
>
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 23:08:05 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know how to detect a truu64 system in configure.in ?
> I'm going through my patchlist and there is a big optimisation that
> can be done on systems where the getgrnam() call works (True64 is
> listed as the only broken syste
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:02:59 -0600
"Christopher R. Hertel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 02:53:14PM +0100, Olaf Fr?czyk wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 14:42, Ireneusz Piasecki wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > I use samba with linux 7.2 kernel 4.7, samba 2.2.1a
> >
> > > Is t
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 23:04:29 -0500
"John E. Malmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael B. Allen wrote:
> >>
> >>No. Strange effects can happen at many different file sizes. If you do
> >>not test it, you do not know that it works.
> >
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 21:26:16 -0500
"John E. Malmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael B. Allen wrote:
> > Richard Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Just reporting that the large file offset code in smbclient and libsmb now
> >&
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 10:23:35 -0800 (PST)
Richard Sharpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just reporting that the large file offset code in smbclient and libsmb now
> seems to work.
>
> I have been chasing a weird problem with 20+ second delays in completing
> writes at times, and have got
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:36:19 -0500
"Ken Cross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've run into a problem with winbindd in both 2.2.x and 3.0 where it
> just locks up after a while on large, busy networks.
>
> We finally tracked down the problem to the fact that the C library
> "select" function is lim
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:44:00 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Don't change the printing code. You'll regret it :-) :-). I was
> also thinking this morning in the shower of moving the error returns to full NTSTATUS
> for all printing returns...
That would make me want to take a shower too.
Mike
-
Hi guys,
Ever notice smbclient sends an NBT session request with an NBT length
field that is 4 bytes longer than necessary? No harm, but is there a
reason for this?
I'm using 2.2.1a shipped with RH connecting to the same version of Samba
over loopback.
Mike
--
A program should be written to m
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:24:09 +
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:02:49PM -0400, Allen, Michael B (RSCH) wrote:
>
> > Clients should not check for *two* zero bytes after the Primary Domain field
>Unicode string
> > in SMB_COM_SESSION_SETUP_A
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:24:48 +1000
Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I wish someone
> > > > would do a real analysis and write some practical documentation.
> > >
> > > A volenteer! Great! I'll see what help I can be, but you might want to
> >
> > This is such a crappy argumen
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 18:58:16 +1000
Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Michael B.Allen" wrote:
> >
> > Don't you think it's kind of funny that Leach and Naik aren't even
> > mentioned in the acknowledgements? And they put a Copyright 2001, 2002 SNIA
> > in there? This documen
Don't you think it's kind of funny that Leach and Naik aren't even
mentioned in the acknowledgements? And they put a Copyright 2001, 2002 SNIA
in there? This document is a big turd. There are major grammatical errors,
technical inaccuracies, and huge holes that aren't even mentioned (w
18 matches
Mail list logo
