On March 30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Why is it that smbd tries to open the directory as a regular file?
This would be the point at which I say works for me! and fail to
understand what's happening on your end. Sorry!
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
On April 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Winbind calls into the rpc client, which starts fetching the list of members
The rpc client sets a timeout and starts pulling the list of group members
Fetching all 60k users takes longer than the timeout, the timeout fires and
the rpc client returns failure
Compiling lib/adt_tree.c
lib/adt_tree.c: In function `sorted_tree_destroy':
lib/adt_tree.c:114: structure has no member named `_free_leap'
make: *** [lib/adt_tree.o] Error 1
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
Junk food is considered part of the vegetable
On April 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 23:41, Ronan Waide wrote:
Compiling lib/adt_tree.c
lib/adt_tree.c: In function `sorted_tree_destroy':
lib/adt_tree.c:114: structure has no member named `_free_leap'
make: *** [lib/adt_tree.o] Error 1
It's due to dmalloc() using
On April 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm looking for some assistance regarding file permissions and the inability
to stop the execution of a file even though the execute permission has not
been set.
Execute bits are a Unix concept. Windows will execute any file it can
read that it understands
[EMAIL PROTECTED] source]# smbclient //server/print\$ -U admin%passwd -Tc
Error opening local file //server/print$ - No such file or directory
It's picking up the share name as the tar file name. Even specifying a
filename after -Tc doesn't work. Sneaking tar.out in as the first
parameter doesn't
On April 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hmmm, I did some testing a week or so ago, and found that removing the
execute permission from ACLs on the file (esp inherited ones) prevents
Win2K from executing the file, although it does open the file for read
first.
Yep, turns out I opened my mouth
Small patch to stop net rpc samsync from copying an empty comment when
syncing group data.
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: source/utils/net_rpc_samsync.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/utils/net_rpc_samsync.c,v
retrieving revision 1.20
On March 26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
What is the bug you're trying to fix ? ie. What is the behaviour
that Windows shows that is not correct with the Samba code ?
The bug I'm seeing is that Samba isn't getting a response to the
WriteAndX request it's sending and times out.
Also, I'd feel
On March 25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Can anyone tell me if this is possible and if so what actions I must take?
Not presently possible. The files remain owned by the user/group that
you used for the smbmount command.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
Ok, I think I've figured this out, but since I'm relatively new to
Samba internals I'm not entirely clear on how to fix it, or what I
might break with my fix.
In a large RPC call, such as an EnumPrinters 2 call with a big buffer,
the DCE/RPC stuff gets split into several SMB messages and tossed
On March 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've been debugging another massive fall-apart at my site :-(
This time it appears that the installation of glibc=2.3.2-4.80.i686.rpm
(required to fix a security issue) broke my installation.
This update also broke wine, but as far as I know the wine
Hi folks,
I've been digging around a problem I've had recently where an NT4 PDC
is refusing to give me password hashes. Everything else from a samsync
run appears ok, just that the password hashes are missing. I've tried
to build an identical virtual machine, but can't figure out what's
causing
There's a bunch of essentially duplicated code in net_rpc_samsync
which should probably be merged into a single block, but anyway. The
previous patch added more useful text for net rpc samdump. This does
likewise for net rpc vampire.
Also, I notice basic indent seems to be set to 5 rather than 4
Thanks to pointers from Andrew Bartlett, I redid my samsync
sam_account_from_delta patch a little more sanely. Now it only marks
as changed things which have actually changed. This patch is against
current HEAD. The STRING_CHANGED macro and general style of the
additions is copied from
This makes samsync tell you what record types it's skipping, rather
than just dumping out the number corresponding to the type. It also
prints the database type instead of database 1, database 2, database
3.
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: utils/net_rpc_samsync.c
On March 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I put all the files in the print share at (\\dev\print$\w32x86). The
files are from Windows XP Professional SP1. The files are, as
reported by the printer test page:
pscript.ntf
pscript.hlp
ps5ui.dll
hplj5si1.ppd
pscript5.dll
I issued the
This patch prevents net rpc vampire from copying empty strings into
various fields; doing so can cause problems with pdb_ldap (and
possibly others).
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: source/utils/net_rpc_samsync.c
===
RCS file:
Currently the code does the following checks:
if the account is ACB_WSTRUST or ACB_SRVTRUST,
set up to create a machine account
else if it's ACB_NORMAL,
set up to create a normal account
else
error unknown account type
This currently fails for ACB_DOMTRUST. I'm not sure what the
On March 19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Firstly, you first said that it expects the files in the w32x86/win40
directories.
Oh, hmm, you're right. Sorry. The files go into the w32x86/win40
directories, but not into the 2/ or 0/ subdirectories of those. My
mistake.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL
uidNumber: 1126
gidNumber: 1000
homeDirectory: /home/waider
uid: waider
rid: 1181
primaryGroupID: 513
displayName: Ronan Waide
cn: Ronan Waide
description: yadda
smbHome: \\srv1\waider
homeDrive: H:
profilePath: \\pdc\profiles\waider
logonTime: 1046707306
logoffTime: 1040143165
kickoffTime: 2147483647
On March 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So why is Samba setting the primaryGroupID to 513?
Okay, I had made two basic errors here. One is that the above is an
RID, not a GID. The second was not double-checking my scripts'
output. The groupadd script was spitting out some garbage before the
GID,
Hi,
still messing about with printers. If I create a printer like so:
[TestP]
printer name = Test_Printer
printable = yes
and then do rpcclient enumprinters 2 against the server, I get:
servername:[\\server]
printername:[\\server\TestP]
sharename:[TestP]
This patch allows WERROR-based RPC calls to return their real value to
the user instead of NT_STATUS_OK/NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL. Basically
I've extended the cmd_set type to include a return type field and
instead of the NTSTATUS (*fn)() definition there's a NTSTATUS
(*ntfn)() and a WERROR (*wfn)();
hi folks,
again with the peculiar setup :) I've set up raw printers in cups to
match the windows network, and added the correct windows drivers to
feed them. One of the printers, a HP Colour LaserJet 8500 in PCL mode,
fails at the testpage stage with this message:
the data area passed to a
On March 13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
hi folks,
again with the peculiar setup :) I've set up raw printers in cups to
match the windows network, and added the correct windows drivers to
feed them. One of the printers, a HP Colour LaserJet 8500 in PCL mode,
fails at the testpage stage with
On March 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
adddriver Windows NT x86 HP LaserJet 5Si/5Si MX
PS:pscript5.dll:hplj5si1.ppd:ps5ui.dll:pscript.hlp::pscript.ntf
Don't leave unused parameters blank. use the word NULL instead.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
On March 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Uh... How can Samba users be members of NT groups? I did not know
Samba supports that... How do you add Unix users to NT groups for
Samba?
I was just clarifying that when I said Printer Admins I wasn't
referring to the NT group.
Yet, my problem
background:
I had a stock redhat samba setup using security = share and sharing
out three directories - [homes] and two fixed locations. pretty
trivial setup. I built Samba 3 head (current as of this morning, but
the problem has been happening for at least a week) and tried
connecting to it from a
when doing enumdomusers, rpcclient prints each one preceded by the
word group instead of user
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: rpcclient/cmd_samr.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/samba/source/rpcclient/cmd_samr.c,v
retrieving revision 1.157
diff -u
On March 9, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Uhmm... I'm not sure. So what do I do - create the share, create
empty directories like 'w32x86' and 'win40' and then issue a setdriver
RPC?
Well, I tried that, does not work, I get:
SetPrinter call failed!
result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL
Hi folks,
* libsmb/smb_signing.c, libsmb/smbencrypt.c, Makefile.in, include/client.h,
libsmb/cliconnect.c, libsmb/clientgen.c:
Change the way we sign SMB packets, to a function pointer interface.
The intention is to allow for NTLMSSP and kerberos signing of packets, but
On March 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I've checked in a fix. It's odd that MAXIMUM_ALLOWED_ACCESS doesn't
do what it's supposed to in this case. Are you running the setdriver
against a NT or Samba server?
Running against Samba HEAD, but just one sec...
Right, here's the summary of what I've
The add printer command program can output a single line of text,
which Samba will set as the port the new printer is connected to. From
my reading of the code, if this line /isn't/ output, Samba won't
reload its printer shares.
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal
Hi folks,
tracked down a problem I mentioned last week with printing. When you
use the rpcclient adddriver command as follows:
adddriver Windows NT x86 name:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL
you get a NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL error, which further investigation
reveals to be caused by an Access
On February 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
try again with HEAD. The Samba 2-2 client rpc code cannot handle
fragmented PDU's too well.
Sorry, should have mentioned. This is with HEAD. Tim Potter has been
having a look at tcpdump plus a level ten debug trace of the rpcclient
run.
Cheers,
Hi folks,
mentioned this briefly on samba@ about a week ago, but I've actually
done some tracking on it now. I'm still digging, but this is a summary
of what I've found.
symptoms: doing rpcclient SERVER enumdrivers level 3 fetches
information for the Windows 9x drivers, then stalls trying to
Hi folks,
this is an updated version of Urban Widmark's smbmount patch to enable
lfs and unicode options to be switched on the command line. It's
diff'd against current CVS HEAD.
Cheers,
Waider.
Index: source/client/smbmount.c
===
Samba HEAD
Looks like it's triggered by not closing quotes:
[root@workst1 root]# rpcclient -U admin%passwd -W GROUP workst1 -d2
added interface ip=192.168.168.250 bcast=192.168.168.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
rpcclient $ adddriver Windows 4.0 HP CL 8500 -
PCL:HPCPCLA.DLL:HP_LJ85.PPD:HPCPCLA1.DLL:H
Added a driver using:
adddriver "Windows 4.0" "PR2:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL:NULL"
Now I get funny characters in the enumdrivers output:
[root@workst1 root]# rpcclient -U user%pass -c "enumdrivers 2" workst1
[Windows 4.0]
Printer Driver Info 2:
line #29:
} else (m/-r/) {
should be
} elsif (m/-r/) {
Cheers,
Waider.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
kate says, no, there's a lot of red in heliotrope.
kate says, we're talking like #993366 or so
hi folks,
ran this command:
rpcclient -U Administrator%password PDC -c getdriver PRINTER
and got this output:
[Windows 4.0]
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Here's the stacktrace:
#0 0x080a8abd in strlen_w (src=0x0) at lib/util_unistr.c:312
#1 0x0809bf6f in pull_ucs2 (base_ptr=0x0,
On January 28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I don't have HPUX, so I don't know what to suggest for that. I just know
getent won't work without winbindd in nsswitch.conf on Linux.
I think the point that was being made is that NSS support on HPUX only
supports a few known types, of which one is LDAP.
Continuing the saga:
Groups are not migrated by the ldap_nua backend, even if I create a
posixGroup entry. After a bit of prodding, I found the latter was
because Samba had set up group mappings in group_mapping.tdb, which my
manually-created LDAP groups didn't agree with. Removing
Hi,
under current CVS samba I've set up a BDC to test some migration
stuff. If I look at it in Network Neighbourhood and view its
properties, it's listed as Windows NT 4.9 Primary. If, however, I look
at it in Server Manager, it's listed as Windows NT 4.9 Backup (which
is what I'd expect, since
Hi,
just spotted this while leafing through the CVS tree (some code elided
for clarity)
source/utils/smbcacls.c
static int cacl_dump(struct cli_state *cli, char *filename)
{
[-]
fnum = cli_nt_create(cli, filename, CREATE_ACCESS_READ);
[-]
if (!sd) {
printf(ERROR: secdesc query
46 matches
Mail list logo
