On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 07:45:36AM +0200, Eddie Lania wrote:
Loadable RPC implementations yes o o o
Does this mean that it will support KIXTART as well?
I've yet to see a good definition of what KIXTART needs, so I
can't say if we will support it.
Andrew Bartlett
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:30:28AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Tim Potter wrote:
I'm just wondering whether it is strictly necessary to uppercase the
username and domain name when performing a session setup. Applying the
following patch should not break anything
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 10:01:53AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote:
Everyone,
I would like to do another alpha snapshot release of the 3.0
code base later this week. Does anyone know of any code that
is too unstable for a release (seg faults, etc...)?
Apparently we ignore non-primary groups
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 11:37:38AM +0200, Chemolli Francesco (USI) wrote:
This program is intended to be invoked directly by external
programs, so
they can pass in the string directly into the right argv
buffer. Shell
users can quote.
What about a also supporting a stream
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 10:17:19AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 12:15:36PM +0200, Rafal Szczesniak wrote:
This is first implementation of caching mechanism. It includes
both lib/gencache.c code and utils/net_cache.c as command-line
control/testing tool.
comments
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:31:57PM -0400, Sean Finney wrote:
hi all--
i've been ghosting this list for a few months now, hoping that i might
read an answer to my question without having to step up and ask, but
now i'm guessing that this won't be the case, so here goes...
i'd like to
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:43:05PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:10:22AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Isn't there a way we can 'idle' the connection by tearing down the
protocol? Actually issuing a 'you are idle, shutting down' to the
client?
Nope -
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:07:52PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
Hi Stefan.
As you may have seen I have already changed the pdb_interface to search
by SID and I'm really i favour to use SIDs inside SAM_ACCOUNT instead of
RIDS, but I think this patch does not address the problem the right way.
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:27:39AM +1000, Tim Potter wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 11:17:59AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Anyway - that looks like a good patch. I've been dying to get rid of all
those silly make_nmb_name() calls everywhere but was not brave enough.
I'll
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 08:20:03AM -0400, Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 18:42, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Moving over the socket is a very expencive operation, particularly
compared to a simple if statement. Also, where we know that a uid is
local, we need to check with code that
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 10:06:53AM -0400, Nathan Lutchansky wrote:
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:50:13AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:22:41PM -0400, Nathan Lutchansky wrote:
1) Can we assume that Microsoft will never include SSL functionality in
their
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:38:33AM +0930, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hi,
I have run into a spot of bother with wbinfo and Win2K.
We run Samba as a member server from a Win2K DC.
We join the DC correctly, but wbinfo -t does not work.
Then you have not joined the domain corrrectly...
This
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 09:54:44AM +0100, Mike Pigott wrote:
Hello,
We are running Samba 2.0.7 for IRIX (v6.5.11m) and are receiving the error cannot
copy file * parameter is incorrect when attempting to copy files 2Gb. OS is
Win98. Can you confirm if this is a known bug, or shall I
This message is a warning:
--with-ssl will die.
Ok, thats enough with the dramatics, but the general consensus amoungst the
samba team is that --with-ssl really isn't a particulary smart idea, and
it is better implmented by external tools.
So what is --with-ssl exactly? And why kill it?
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 05:00:32PM -0400, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
I decided to modify pdbedit to handle another
command line parameter -c /pathto/smb.conf
I've got that working - but I'm not sure it's safe
Is it reasonable to expect the popt stuff to give me back
null terminated
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:35:41AM +0200, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Alex Keahan wrote:
For the time being, I am going to implement a temporary solution, but
I would really like to see this fixed in the 2.2 branch.
it won't be fixed in 2.2, it's way too
16 matches
Mail list logo