On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 12:25:42AM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 22:59, Jeremy Allison wrote:
But Simo, I disagree about the internal rep. I think it
needs to be utf8 for Samba internal strings. We already
have to deal with mbcs issues - this doesn't make it any
worse.
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:32:50PM -0400, Michael Sweet wrote:
In addition, no matter what Unicode representation is used, you
still have to deal with different representations of the same
character (is it a single character a with an umlat, or a
plus a combining umlat character?, etc.)
