Re: Converting new docs

2002-08-27 Thread Michael Still
On 28 Aug 2002, Simo Sorce wrote: > GPL is a copyleft licence :)) > you mean why not use FDL? (free Documentation License) Or the OPL. Mikal -- Michael Still ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) UMT+10hrs

Re: Converting new docs

2002-08-27 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 03:24:02AM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote about 'Re: Converting new docs': > On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 03:13, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > Is there any specific reason the docs are GPL'ed and not Copylefted? > > I don't care, just wondering :-) &g

Re: Converting new docs

2002-08-27 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 03:13, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > Hi! > > I did some work on the samba docs at SFO airport, on the flight > back home and some earlier stuff I did during the plugfest and back > home.. : [snip] > Is there any specific reason the docs are GPL'ed and not Copylefted? > I don't ca

Converting new docs

2002-08-27 Thread Jelmer Vernooij
Hi! I did some work on the samba docs at SFO airport, on the flight back home and some earlier stuff I did during the plugfest and back home.. : - Combined some text docs and wrote "Portability.sgml" for the HOWTO Collection - Info on platform specific issues when compiling samba - Combined so