RE: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-16 Thread Nir Soffer
eping Song > -Original Message- > From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 2:30 AM > To: Nir Soffer > Cc: Christopher R. Hertel; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22 > >

Re: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-14 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Richard Sharpe wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Nir Soffer wrote: > > > > > FWIW turning off unicode with unicode=no helps somewhat, and both > > ethereal and Samba parse the session request correctly: > > Hmmm, I fixed a problem in Ethereal around Unicode handling last week at > Connectathon. I

RE: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-14 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Nir Soffer wrote: > > FWIW turning off unicode with unicode=no helps somewhat, and both > ethereal and Samba parse the session request correctly: Hmmm, I fixed a problem in Ethereal around Unicode handling last week at Connectathon. I would be very interested in a trace th

FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-12 Thread Nir Soffer
al Message- From: Nir Soffer Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 4:30 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22 Something our QA department stumbled on: I try to log on to my Samba 3.0a22 installation (make, make install, the usual sheba

Re: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Nir Soffer wrote: : > FWIW turning off unicode with unicode=no helps somewhat, and both ethereal and Samba > parse the session request correctly: > > [2003/03/11 20:11:30, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(732) > Domain=[CACOMISTLE] NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows >

RE: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Nir Soffer
> Nir Soffer wrote: > : > : > > It seems to me that a more correct fix would be, in the > case of encrypt > > passwords = no, to request a normal password and not a > UNICODE one. Is > > this even possible in the protocol? (e.g - request > non-unicode passwords, > > but still support non-unicode

Re: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Nir Soffer wrote: : : > It seems to me that a more correct fix would be, in the case of encrypt > passwords = no, to request a normal password and not a UNICODE one. Is > this even possible in the protocol? (e.g - request non-unicode passwords, > but still support non-unicode filenames?) Unicode i

RE: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Nir Soffer
> Nir Soffer wrote: > > > > Something our QA department stumbled on: > > > > I try to log on to my Samba 3.0a22 installation (make, make > install, the > > usual shebang). The client name is CACOMISTLE (not the > NativeOS), the > > user name is nirs, (not the domain). > > Any ideas or thoughts

Re: FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Nir Soffer wrote: > > Something our QA department stumbled on: > > I try to log on to my Samba 3.0a22 installation (make, make install, the > usual shebang). The client name is CACOMISTLE (not the NativeOS), the > user name is nirs, (not the domain). > Any ideas or thoughts, or are we doing somet

FW: encrypt passwords = no, security=user, samba 3.0a22

2003-03-11 Thread Nir Soffer
Something our QA department stumbled on: I try to log on to my Samba 3.0a22 installation (make, make install, the usual shebang). The client name is CACOMISTLE (not the NativeOS), the user name is nirs, (not the domain). Any ideas or thoughts, or are we doing something incredibly stupid? (I'v