Hi Michael,
Michael Fair wrote:
The admin would have to rechown all the files from the
old ids to the new ones, but a simple find command could
probably manage that.
How does that work? Any major wrinkles?
I'm not feeling really comfortable with winbind assigning all
UIDs and GIDs on a system,
Michael Steffens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Michael,
Michael Fair wrote:
The admin would have to rechown all the files from the
old ids to the new ones, but a simple find command could
probably manage that.
How does that work? Any major wrinkles?
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 20:29, Michael Fair wrote:
Michael Steffens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Michael,
Michael Fair wrote:
The admin would have to rechown all the files from the
old ids to the new ones, but a simple find command could
probably
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 20:46, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 01:32, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 10:38, Michael Fair wrote:
I haven't done much work in this are yet so please feel
free to correct me as you see fit, but as I understand it,
part of the problem we
Hi Michael,
Michael Fair wrote:
Oh yes, entirely! Nothing I mentioned was an attempt
to put winbind in control of all the UID/GIDs on a system.
I personally have never used, nor even heard of a system
that used UID/GIDs 100,000,000 and above. That's the address
space that winbind would be
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sit in two camps on this one - for local UIDs/GIDs, I actually like
the 'algorithmic', but it's confined to a single uid/gid space.
For winbindd, I'm convinced that the tdb mapping is the best way
forward, but that
I hadn't realized that an SID is actually 256 bits and we at
best only have 32 bits to work with I I was only thinking
about the RIDs).
A SID is variable length, really.
-- Luke
--
Luke Howard | PADL Software Pty Ltd | www.padl.com
I haven't done much work in this are yet so please feel
free to correct me as you see fit, but as I understand it,
part of the problem we face is that the equivalents of
the UID and a GID in UNIX, are mapped to the same address
space in Windows.
I was working on some unrelated ACL stuff and
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm going to rearrange the order, because I think there
is a second set of problems that can all be addressed
together.
First:
If the groups were published in LDAP, then winbind
wouldn't need to do any additional
