Re: Quick, outdated share-level question.

2002-10-18 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: Do I understand correctly that Samba does not offer a per-share password, even when running under security=share? In the original, outdated design of SMB (COREP.TXT) passwords were assigned to

Re: Quick, outdated share-level question.

2002-10-18 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:43:53AM -0500, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: : Samba always bvalidates a username/password pair. For a share level equivalent service, do something like [share1] username = acct1 force user = acct1 path = /tmp

Re: Quick, outdated share-level question.

2002-10-18 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Christopher R. Hertel wrote: That's what I thought. I'm not trying to make share-level security work as originally intended, I'm just trying to figure out how we do it. If the client sent an SMBsessetupX request, we save the

Quick, outdated share-level question.

2002-10-17 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
For my book... Do I understand correctly that Samba does not offer a per-share password, even when running under security=share? In the original, outdated design of SMB (COREP.TXT) passwords were assigned to shares. I don't see a mechanism in newer Samba docs that allows for a per-share