On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 01:12, Richard Sharpe wrote:
Right, XATTRs would be one way to do it on Linux. Of course, Samba needs
some mods, and Tridge was looking at putting that into his NTVFS layer
(where it belongs).
Hi,
It will not work.
For example XFS has maximum length for them: 64 KB.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:01:51PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Samba-folk:
Samba apparently does not support Alternate Data Streams/Multiple Data
Streams. ADS/MDS are the hidden files associated with the Summary tab
on a 2K/XP/.Net version of Windows. A file on a SAMBA_3_0 server does
not
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Ken Cross wrote:
Samba-folk:
Samba apparently does not support Alternate Data Streams/Multiple Data
Streams. ADS/MDS are the hidden files associated with the Summary tab
on a 2K/XP/.Net version of Windows. A file on a SAMBA_3_0 server does
not even display the
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Ken Cross wrote:
Samba-folk:
Samba apparently does not support Alternate Data Streams/Multiple Data
Streams. ADS/MDS are the hidden files associated with the Summary tab
on a 2K/XP/.Net version of Windows. A file on a SAMBA_3_0 server does
not even display the
Ken,
How would you store that information on a Unix filesystem? How do you
prevent users or other services from messing things up?
There are solutions, but it's a much bigger problem than it seems on the
surface.
Chris -)-
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:01:51PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Ken,
How would you store that information on a Unix filesystem? How do you
prevent users or other services from messing things up?
There are solutions, but it's a much bigger problem than it seems on the
surface.
There are some
R. Hertel
Cc: 'samba-technical'; Ken Cross
Subject: Re: Support for Multiple Data Streams?
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Ken,
How would you store that information on a Unix filesystem?
How do you
prevent users or other services from messing things up
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 01:14:29PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Ken,
How would you store that information on a Unix filesystem? How do you
prevent users or other services from messing things up?
There are solutions, but it's a
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:46:59PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Yes, to support it properly, the underlying filesystem should include
all streams when you cp/mv/rm/... And a portable backup/restore could
be interesting!
However, I'm having trouble getting Samba to return goofy names like
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 10:12:47AM +1100, Tim Potter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:46:59PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Yes, to support it properly, the underlying filesystem should include
all streams when you cp/mv/rm/... And a portable backup/restore could
be interesting!
However,
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, Tim Potter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 03:46:59PM -0500, Ken Cross wrote:
Yes, to support it properly, the underlying filesystem should include
all streams when you cp/mv/rm/... And a portable backup/restore could
be interesting!
However, I'm having trouble
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:28:33PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, to support it properly, the underlying filesystem should include
all streams when you cp/mv/rm/... And a portable backup/restore could
be interesting!
However, I'm having trouble getting Samba to return goofy
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
:
in samba we filter out path names witch include ':' and return
STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
Kewl...
So, what do we do if the filename on the server actually *does* have a colon
in it? (I can check for myself but it's worth discussing...)
Chris -)-
--
At 00:32 21.03.2003 -0600, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
:
in samba we filter out path names witch include ':' and return
STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND
Kewl...
So, what do we do if the filename on the server actually *does* have a colon
in it? (I can check for
14 matches
Mail list logo
