-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, James Braid wrote:
I had the same problem aswell..
I found it was due to the fact the groups weren't 'Global' groups only
'Local' groups...
Apparently they need to be Global or Universal to be shown by Winbind.
I
, October 25, 2002 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: Winbind doesnt enumerate more than one group from an AD domain
I had the same problem aswell..
I found it was due to the fact the groups weren't 'Global' groups only
'Local' groups...
Apparently they need to be Global or Universal to be shown by Winbind.
I have tried using Global and Universal groups on the AD server and
neither type seems to work.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:09:11PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
Domain local groups existed under Windows NT 4.0. They were just
available among DC's of the domain. See my other post in response to JF.
To my knowledge (derived from some doc on msdn) they are a different
thing. local groups
Sorry about this, but this email address seems to be a bit dodgy. Please reply to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, James
- Original Message -
From: James Braid [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:45 PM
Subject: Winbind doesnt enumerate more than one group from an AD domain
Hi all,
I have been having some problems with winbind not seeing all the groups
that users on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Gareth Davies wrote:
Apparently they need to be Global or Universal to be shown by Winbind.
Local groups are supported by winbindd using rpc. The LDAP backends for
winbindd needs this support added (it's a no-op function
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
you mean local groups within the S-1-5-32 sid sub tree or the local
domain groups under the PDC SID ? If that's the first case, winbind
shouldn't even read them, they have no meaning outside
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25 Oct 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
JF is totally right winbind should never ask for PDCs local group.
But there is a third option, MS has defined an obscure (to me) new type
of group in w2k, the global local group do you mean this one jerry?
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
you mean local groups within the S-1-5-32 sid sub tree or the local
domain groups under the PDC SID ? If that's the first case,
On Fri, 2002-10-25 at 21:55, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
Domain local groups existed under Windows NT 4.0. They were just
available among DC's of the domain. See my other post in response to JF.
To my knowledge (derived from some doc on msdn) they are a different
thing. local groups (same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
ok then it's still a problem of vocabulary :) Can we settle on a
definitive wording ?
local groups, domain groups, domain local groups, universal groups.
Fine by me :-)
cheers, jerry
12 matches
Mail list logo
