On Mon, 27 May 2002, Norbert Klasen wrote:
> We at DAASI suggest that "sambaAccount" is redefined (new OID, new name?)
> as an AUXILIARY object class. For Samba-only repositories, the "account"
> object class should be used as structural object class just as RFC2307
> suggests for "posixAccoun
Yes, you are right, the only reason (that I can remember right now) for
it not being an auxiliary object class was that OpenLDAP didn't check
such things, there might be another reason(s) (and probably are) but I
can't remember them off the of my head.
--Shahms
On Mon, 2002-05-27 at 09:06, Norber
