Hello list,
Has anybody coded some sort of workaround for joining domains with
RestrictAnonymous set? The typical behavior I see is for NT4 domains we're
able to look up sequence, but never enumerate users and groups. For ADS
domains, it seems that even looking up sequence from the domain fails.
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Marc Kaplan wrote:
Hello list,
Has anybody coded some sort of workaround for joining domains with
RestrictAnonymous set? The typical behavior I see is for NT4 domains we're
able to look up sequence, but never enumerate users and groups. For ADS
domains, it seems that
PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: Restrict Anonymous
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Marc Kaplan wrote:
Hello list,
Has anybody coded some sort of workaround for joining domains with
RestrictAnonymous set? The typical behavior I see is for NT4 domains we're
able to look up sequence, but never enumerate users
:52
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Restrict Anonymous
Hello list,
Has anybody coded some sort of workaround for joining domains with
RestrictAnonymous set? The typical behavior I see is for NT4
domains we're
able to look up sequence, but never enumerate users and
groups. For ADS
hp CR1501 and friends
This patch tries to make winbindd cope with the security option
'restrict anonymous=1' on NT4 and W2kS. When this option is set, the
DC disallows SAMR calls on unauthenticated connections, but does allow
LSA translations between names and sids.
Obviously winbindd can't
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 19:40, Tim Potter wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 07:32:06PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
In the Samba HEAD and 3.0 branches however the parameter behaves more
like the RestrictAnonymous registry setting. Only 'restrict anonymous = 1'
is currently supported
Yannick Mercier wrote:
:
Unfortunately, Ill have to back out to samba 2.2 because I'm using this
samba server as a PDC also, and when I logon with my WinXP workstation,
the PC reboots during Loading desktop settings
I guess its a bug in the alpha version of samba
If the XP system reboots
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 15:08, Tim Potter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:50:47PM -0500, Yannick Mercier wrote:
I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the
restrict anonymous as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed
to behave from the start, in order to deny
ALL
I installed the samba-3.0alpha20 (latest I think) and restrict anonymous =
1 works
for denying the shares Listing from non-authentified users. As what Ive
read, the restrict anonymous = 2
is not implemented yet, but when it will be, it is supposed to deny all rpc
calls, which will be great
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:50:47PM -0500, Yannick Mercier wrote:
I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the
restrict anonymous as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed
to behave from the start, in order to deny
ALL anonymous connections as stated in the man :
When
I'm thinking about taking back the restrict anonymous parameter and
using it to do Good Things. Previously in HEAD and currently in 2.2 it
stops people connecting to shares anonymously but I think Mr Bartlett
removed it because it was either buggy or didn't do anything useful.
I propose
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:37:59PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
I propose that this parameter act like the RestrictAnonymous registry
setting, i.e it prevents anonymous access to the SAMR pipe and anonymous
access to the NetShareEnum RPC when set to 1. When set to 2, it
disallows
12 matches
Mail list logo
