Quick follow up... the problem was on another server. After the last reboot, not too long ago, "fast-ethernet" negotiation between the
Cisco switch and the Sun server did not work properly. Cisco switch
negotiated at 100Mbps/full and the Sun server in half duplex.
Pierre B.
Pierre Belanger wrote:
Hello all,
This weekend, we upgraded our Samba servers to 2.2.8 (pre3 according to the include/version.h -- CVS "synced" this past Saturday afternoon, EDT). I compiled this new release for the following Solaris/kernel :
Solaris 6 : kernel patch 105181-33 Solaris 7 : kernel patch 106541-23 Solaris 8 : kernel patch 108528-19
Prior to Solaris 8 108528-19, that was installed yesterday *not by me* , we were running 108528-12. Solaris 8 with kernel patch 108518-19 + latest Samba is causing us troubles. ps : nothing changed in our smb.conf file / we had no problems before (the fcntl() bug was not an issue for us, we only have around ~ 150 concurrent connections on that machine).
There's no problems on the other boxes (Solaris 6 & 7), note that we have much less connections on those boxes.
[Q] Is there anyone on this list running with the latest Solaris 8 (108528-19) kernel patch and with Samba 2.2.8?
After receiving a few complains, I decided to dig into the log files. Here's what I found:
1- Many dptr_close() errors, more than usually.
log.wcanomp1775:[2003/03/17 14:04:09, 0] smbd/dir.c:dptr_close(277) log.wcanomp1775: Invalid key 256 given to dptr_close
2- Many oplock_break errors, much more than we had:
[2003/03/17 15:32:49, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(791) oplock_break: end of file from client oplock_break failed for file New Lisp/mbold.lsp (dev = 3d8000a, inode = 1467387, file_id = 15). [2003/03/17 15:32:49, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(879) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2003/03/17 15:32:49, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(677) wcanomp2081 (10.10.92.33) closed connection to service imews [2003/03/17 15:32:49, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(677) wcanomp2081 (10.10.92.33) closed connection to service site_doc [2003/03/17 15:32:49, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(677) wcanomp2081 (10.10.92.33) closed connection to service docoss [2003/03/17 15:34:24, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(636) wcanomp2081 (10.10.92.33) connect to service site_doc as user imews (uid=2138, gid=240) (pid 4863) [2003/03/17 15:35:10, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1011) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 4858 on port 56392 for dev = 3d8000a, inode = 825700, file_id = 15 [2003/03/17 15:35:10, 0] smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(652) open_mode_check: exlusive oplock left by process 4858 after break ! For file C 1505A/AA1710-W.dwg, dev = 3d8000a, inode = 825700. Deleting it to continue... [2003/03/17 15:35:10, 0] smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(656) open_mode_check: Existent process 4858 left active oplock. [2003/03/17 15:36:59, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(636) wcanomp2081 (10.10.92.33) connect to service site_doc as user imews (uid=2138, gid=240) (pid 4883) [2003/03/17 15:36:59, 0] smbd/dir.c:dptr_close(277) Invalid key 256 given to dptr_close [2003/03/17 15:36:59, 0] smbd/dir.c:dptr_close(277) Invalid key 257 given to dptr_close [2003/03/17 15:37:10, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(397) process_local_message: Received unsolicited break reply - dumping info. [2003/03/17 15:37:10, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(412) process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 4863, port 56392, dev = 3d8000a, inode = 825700, file_id = 15 [2003/03/17 15:38:02, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(677) wcanomp2081 (10.10.92.33) closed connection to service site_doc [2003/03/17 15:38:09, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(636) wcanomp2081 (10.10.92.33) connect to service site_doc as user imews (uid=2138, gid=240) (pid 4904) [2003/03/17 15:41:22, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(677) wcanomp2081 (10.10.92.33) closed connection to service imews [2003/03/17 15:41:22, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(677) wcanomp2081 (10.10.92.33) closed connection to service docoss
I will "downgrade" tonight to the previous version that we were running prior to the upgrade, it says "2.2.8pre1" but I remember taken that from CVS around February the 5th, according to the installation date!!!
I wish I would have more time for this but I don't :-( I'll "find" time tomorrow to let you know if the downgrade helped or not.
Cheers, Pierre B.
