On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 10:35:52AM -0600, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote about 'Re:
Status of docs merge to 3.0':
> On 1 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > I've been doing a few doc updates in HEAD, and was about to merge them
> > to 3.0 - but I'm not quite sur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> I've been doing a few doc updates in HEAD, and was about to merge them
> to 3.0 - but I'm not quite sure what the status is, given we seem to
> have a slightly different syntax in HEAD (XML
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 01 February 2003 09:07, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> I've been doing a few doc updates in HEAD, and was about to merge them
> to 3.0 - but I'm not quite sure what the status is, given we seem to
> have a slightly different
I've been doing a few doc updates in HEAD, and was about to merge them
to 3.0 - but I'm not quite sure what the status is, given we seem to
have a slightly different syntax in HEAD (XML compliant?)
So, should I just merge my text changes, or wait for the lot to be
merged or?
Andre
Hi Jelmer,
please merge the recycle patch to 3_0
metze
-
Stefan "metze" Metzmacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 05:17:10PM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote about
'merge...':
> Hi Jelmer,
> please merge the recycle patch to 3_0
Applied.
Thanks,
Jelmer
"Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I've updated my sam_ads module can you merge the changes to HEAD?
Done.
Kai: I'll take your sam_passdb stuff in as soon as you like - it's
easier to track if we keep it all in CVS.
(Yes, the bar o
