samba_2_2 sambatest (security=server) and ldap performance

2002-10-31 Thread Ignacio Coupeau
We have several samba printservers and fileservers with security=server validating against several PDC with ldap (samba 2.2.6). I found a lot of ldap request like: (uid=SAMBATESTPSERVER04) beating the ldap servers: one before *each* validation in every print job or share session. I found this

Re: samba_2_2 sambatest (security=server) and ldap performance

2002-10-31 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 11:33:15AM +0100, Ignacio Coupeau wrote: We have several samba printservers and fileservers with security=server validating against several PDC with ldap (samba 2.2.6). I found a lot of ldap request like: (uid=SAMBATESTPSERVER04) beating the ldap servers: one

Re: samba_2_2 sambatest (security=server) and ldap performance

2002-10-31 Thread Ignacio Coupeau
Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 11:33:15AM +0100, Ignacio Coupeau wrote: We have several samba printservers and fileservers with security=server validating against several PDC with ldap (samba 2.2.6). I found a lot of ldap request like: (uid=SAMBATESTPSERVER04) beating the

Re: samba_2_2 sambatest (security=server) and ldap performance

2002-10-31 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:20:25PM +0100, Ignacio Coupeau wrote: Andrew Bartlett wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 11:33:15AM +0100, Ignacio Coupeau wrote: We have several samba printservers and fileservers with security=server validating against several PDC with ldap (samba 2.2.6). I

Re: samba_2_2 sambatest (security=server) and ldap performance

2002-10-31 Thread Ignacio Coupeau
Andrew Bartlett wrote: You could, but you really don't want to. Security=server is really nasty. Fix whatever is causing Samba to pick the wrong DC for secruity=domain. You can still specify the server to use. fixed (a wrong path :), we are using security = domain in the print servers now.