On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:23:16AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Guestsam is in there to provide the only useful thing unixsam did -
ensuring that the guest account really was the guest, and had the guest
RID. It also helped with some Win2k behavior that assumed the presence
of the
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 18:52, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:23:16AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Guestsam is in there to provide the only useful thing unixsam did -
ensuring that the guest account really was the guest, and had the guest
RID. It also helped with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew,
I notice that the default for the passdb backend parameter has been
changed in SAMBA_3_0/HEAD, but the man page has not been updated.
Since it was passdb backend = unixsam that was breaking
'smbpasswd -a', I'm wondering is unixsam even
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 08:48, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew,
I notice that the default for the passdb backend parameter has been
changed in SAMBA_3_0/HEAD, but the man page has not been updated.
Since it was passdb backend =
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 09:48, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 08:48, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew,
I notice that the default for the passdb backend parameter has been
changed in SAMBA_3_0/HEAD, but the man page has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Unixsam was a useful hack and a bad idea. Most of what it was trying
to do it couldn't really do, and will be replaced by idmap. I had
wanted all rid-uid translations to go via the passdb. However, we
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 10:10, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31 Mar 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Unixsam was a useful hack and a bad idea. Most of what it was trying
to do it couldn't really do, and will be replaced by idmap. I had
