- Original Message -
From: Jim Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John E. Malmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: NetBEUI as main protocol
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 08:26 PM, John E. Malmberg wrote:
The only advantage
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 03:24 AM, Gareth Davies wrote:
Not sure what this thread is about exactly but if I catch the drift
correctly you may well find this useful:
http://www.nu2.nu/bootdisk/network/
Thanks - good resource if you need a boot floppy to get on the network.
However,
Thanks for all your help everyone, not just John. Indeed it is a small
network, around 20 computers that this box serves, and the NetBEUI traffic
is light.
I still sort-of disagree with the no security advantage statement though.
While I do know of NetBEUI exploits, IMHO it is still a good
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 08:42, Jason Hihn wrote:
Up until the other day we didn't have an internet-visible, Unix-based
host behind the router. We do now, so that is a concern of mine more
than ever.
It sounds to me like you are relying on the ISP's router to protect you
from the Internet. And
Good comments, all of them.
I hate to say it, but it really comes down to the fact that you are
trying to hide behind a protocol, instead of doing a proper firewall for
your LAN. No offense intended
None is taken. *I* did not set it up this way, and I had thought of some of
the very same
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin,
1) You did create a machine account (for an NT Workstation or Server)
using the Server Manager on the NT4 Domain?
Joining the domain will NOT work unless you do.
2) Try:
smbpasswd -j lister -r cat -Uadministrator
and when
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:27:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have smbwrapper and smbsh working on Debian/woody with the Linux 2.4 kernel
and the default C library: libc-2.2.5.so. There is a problem that rears its
ugly head with a few programs (segmentation violation, presumably due
I just installed the debian a20 packages
(thanks steve and eloy)
i'm posting to technical because it's about an alpha releas
Once or twice a day i have to kill runaway processes (-9 required)
they seem to as much cpu as is available
I just saw one client with three connections to the server
1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:27:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have smbwrapper and smbsh working on Debian/woody with the Linux 2.4
kernel and the default C library: libc-2.2.5.so.
Yes, I'm interested - please post patches. Pressure of other things has made
Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a user, I welcome alternatives to smbfs.
Patch has been posted.
(I'm also looking forward to trying out
http://us1.samba.org/samba/Linux_CIFS_client.html)
I did minimal testing of it. It seems to work fine, as long as you don't need
to access anything
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:54:52PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:27:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have smbwrapper and smbsh working on Debian/woody with the Linux 2.4
kernel and the default C library: libc-2.2.5.so.
Yes, I'm interested - please
Title: MSLinux!?!?!?
Microsoft to offer Linux software?
In a major strategy shift, Microsoft Corp. will introduce software based on the Linux open source operating system in 2004 ...
(Copyrighted article, or I'd post it. Here's a link: )
Title: MSLinux!?!?!?
I
noticed that myself earlier today. Quite interesting.
Ryan
-Original Message-From: Esh, Andrew
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:20
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
MSLinux!?!?!?
Microsoft to offer Linux software?
In a
Title: MSLinux!?!?!?
Do
we die from an world war III nukewar or M$ crapcode in good systems in near
future ?
How
do we patch this ?
--
Ulf
This
message might not be written by me.
Sue
/dev/nul
-Original Message-From: Ryan Benner
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday,
I noticed references to interesting sounding netbeui patches for Linux
kernel from Procom at:
http://bazar.conectiva.com.br/~acme/patches/wip/
Based on the official kernel status looks like they won't make 2.5 though.
Steve French
Senior Software Engineer
Linux Technology Center - IBM
At 8:14 PM -0800 12/9/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 08:10:00PM -0800, Conrad Minshall wrote:
A local filesystem has to return EFBIG to Samba (per POSIX write system
call def'n) and in the Samba source I'm looking at EFBIG isn't used
anywhere relevant to a WRITE_ANDX, in
(Please take this to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it's not a
development issue.)
Try
defining the IP address for "CAT" in your /etc/lmhosts file. Your WINS server
may not be supplying good information. Also, try to ping CAT at its IP address.
It doesn't appear to be reachable from where the Samba
Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 09:26:24PM -0500, John E. Malmberg wrote:
Jason Hihn wrote:
I've a need for Samba to work over NetBEUI. We have a file server
here that only speaks that way to bar out TCP-based hackers,
There is a popular misconception that you can use
Jason Hihn wrote:
Good comments, all of them.
I hate to say it, but it really comes down to the fact that you are
trying to hide behind a protocol, instead of doing a proper
firewall for your LAN. No offense intended
None is taken. *I* did not set it up this way, and I had thought of
19 matches
Mail list logo
