Disk full error message with certain apps

2002-05-30 Thread Mark Branigan
Hi all, First off, Samba -- great bit of software, goes like a rocket. Now I have done a bit of creeping, on to the problem. The problem is solid, repeatable and reproducible. My gut feeling is it is something to do with the way Samba and certain Microsoft file

Re: Microsoft's Dfs

2002-05-30 Thread Urban Widmark
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Richard Sharpe wrote: Hmmm, I don't think that any do yet. I expect to be looking at smbclient and will try to put the code into libsmb, but that is still an issue for things like smbfs, I believe because of the amount of junk that might get dragged in. Regarding

RE: Disk full error message with certain apps

2002-05-30 Thread MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
Hi Mark, This may not be your problem, but I had a person that was getting the same symptoms with certain ms office 97 apps (specifically ones that had links to other docs in them). Setting strict allocate = yes took care of the problem for them... Hope this helps, Don -Original

Disable spoolss

2002-05-30 Thread Lapers Stefan
Title: Disable spoolss Due to quite some problems with the RPC printing code in samba (landscape, paper size), I would like to disable the spoolss functionality and use the old code. However I will probably need Active Directory support in the near future, so reverting to samba 2.0 is no

known BUG multi-byte character set in usernames

2002-05-30 Thread Guenther Deschner
hello, smb.conf-manpage of 2.2.5pre and HEAD states the bug of multi-byte character sets in usernames: -8--snip--8-- BUG: There is currently a bug in the implementation of security = domain with respect to multi-byte character set

Re: known BUG multi-byte character set in usernames

2002-05-30 Thread Juergen Hasch
Hi Guenther, Am Donnerstag, 30. Mai 2002 16:17 schrieb Guenther Deschner: hello, smb.conf-manpage of 2.2.5pre and HEAD states the bug of multi-byte character sets in usernames: -8--snip--8-- BUG: There is currently a bug in the implementation

Re: Microsoft DFS and the CIFS VFS

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Thu, 30 May 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: The FreeBSD kernel wouldn't be distributed with this module. It would be in the ports system and compiled/added at a later time. Yes, but someone who was distributing the package with their kernel and propietary product would have to release

Re: Microsoft's Dfs - GPL LICENSE ISSUE

2002-05-30 Thread Wes Peters
David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: It is GPL code. I don't think it can be used in the FreeBSD kernel (correct me if I'm wrong Steve). I don't think this will be a problem. We currently have a GPL math emulator in our kernel, just not enabled by default options

Re: Microsoft DFS and the CIFS VFS

2002-05-30 Thread Urban Widmark
On Thu, 30 May 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: That makes sense. Currently we ship with something under GPL in our kernel so I think this has already been taken care of. We do not charge for our sources and they are all readily available. smbfs is distributed with FreeBSD and I believe

Re: Microsoft DFS and the CIFS VFS

2002-05-30 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
There is a smbfs implementation in BSD, but I believe it does not have any connection to the GPL'ed Linux version, other than for some comments where they have obviously compared what the code does (but that is allowed). I think it was made for one BSD variant first and that it has been

Re: Microsoft DFS and the CIFS VFS

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Sharpe
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Urban Widmark wrote: On Thu, 30 May 2002, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: That makes sense. Currently we ship with something under GPL in our kernel so I think this has already been taken care of. We do not charge for our sources and they are all readily available.

Re: Microsoft DFS and the CIFS VFS

2002-05-30 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2002-05-30 at 18:35, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: There is a smbfs implementation in BSD, but I believe it does not have any connection to the GPL'ed Linux version, other than for some comments where they have obviously compared what the code does (but that is allowed). I think

Re: Changing domain passwords

2002-05-30 Thread James Willard
Andrew, Thank you so much for your help. The net ads password command works beautifully in changing a users' AD password as an administrative user. However, there were a few gotcha's that weren't mentioned in the ADS-HOWTO.txt. The first problem I ran into was that the RPM of OpenLDAP that came

Re: Stablising the winbind interface for squid's NTLM code

2002-05-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 07:38:00AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote: An oft-requested feature for FreeTDS (an LGPL client library for MS SQL and Sybase servers) is domain login support. It would be nice to be able to leverage the Samba team's work in the NTLMSSP department, rather than

Re: Microsoft's Dfs - GPL LICENSE ISSUE

2002-05-30 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-05-30 07:27 -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: It is GPL code. I don't think it can be used in the FreeBSD kernel (correct me if I'm wrong Steve). I don't think this will be a problem. We currently have a GPL math emulator in our kernel, just not enabled by default

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-30 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:35:38AM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote: On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:55:20PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 04:48:27PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And are you saying that Win2k will never 'idle' a client connection? I'm sure I've seen

Warning in trans2.c under AIX

2002-05-30 Thread Juergen Hasch
When compiling Samba 2_2 CVS under AIX 4.3.3 using gcc or xlc_r, I get the following warnings: smbd/trans2.c: In function `get_lanman2_dir_entry': smbd/trans2.c:759: warning: right shift count = width of type smbd/trans2.c:759: warning: right shift count = width of type smbd/trans2.c:759:

taking back the 'restrict anonymous' parameter

2002-05-30 Thread Tim Potter
I'm thinking about taking back the restrict anonymous parameter and using it to do Good Things. Previously in HEAD and currently in 2.2 it stops people connecting to shares anonymously but I think Mr Bartlett removed it because it was either buggy or didn't do anything useful. I propose that

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Bollinger
Please see: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q297684 Which says in part... SYMPTOMS When you perform drive mapping from a Windows 2000-based client computer to either a Microsoft Windows NT or Windows 2000 network share, the drive mapping may be disconnected after 15

oplock error

2002-05-30 Thread Dennis Lattka
I'm getting file corruption due to oplock errors. Running Linux RH 7.2, samba-2.2.4 and Win2k SP2 clients. Have tried turning oplocks off but that was a disaster. Mainly MSoffice 2k and DB files get corrupted. This is creating serious problems. Error message : [2002/05/30 14:30:10, 0]

Re: taking back the 'restrict anonymous' parameter

2002-05-30 Thread Tim Potter
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 04:37:59PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: I propose that this parameter act like the RestrictAnonymous registry setting, i.e it prevents anonymous access to the SAMR pipe and anonymous access to the NetShareEnum RPC when set to 1. When set to 2, it disallows

Re: Thanks for fixing oplock.c for Linux 2.0 in 2_2 CVS

2002-05-30 Thread Richard Bollinger
Wouldn't it be neat if we could do _better_ than MS at their own game and somehow prevent the win9x client bug from getting triggered in case of timeout disconnections? Rich Bollinger - Original Message - From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Richard Bollinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: