Dear samba developer,
i think i found a bug. I run SAMBA HEAD on an AIX 4.3.3 ML 10 IBM RS 6000
Hardware. I compile with : ./configure --with-acl-support --with-tdbsam
The compile and install works great. Even the adding of userses to the
password backend tdbsam_nua works local.
But after i
the is no
documentation on hidden share ability but adding $-sign to end of share it hides
it.
only problem is that
it's not accessible anymore.
for user who is not
allowed to access the share it asks for username and password,
but
user which is valid
is presented with: "network usage
At 09:53 13.06.2002 +0200, Kai Krueger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June
12, 2002 10:43 AM
Hi,
I've startet to make the group mapping code modulized in the way it is
done
in the auth and passdb subsystems.
I
...
Compiling smbd/dir.c
smbd/dir.c: In function `get_dir_entry':
smbd/dir.c:608: void value not ignored as it ought to be
make: *** [smbd/dir.o] Error 1
...
Please fix. Thanks, Rich Bollinger
I've tried everything i can think of but i can't map a network drive.
Everything else on Samba is working ok. I can log on via the internet to
look at the shares etc (by doing \\126.12.250.24:901.) and the processes are
running ok. The /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd shows (i set the log level to
A colleague who runs a benchmarking group noticed something
bizarre lately: while working with Netbench 7.0.2 running against
Samba version 2.2.1a on RH Linux 7.2 on a 2xPIII 1400Ghz machine...
| I can net use f: \\lab39\files1 OK to the Samba shares. I
| can use WordPad to read and write
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 18:10, Simo Sorce wrote:
And samba is not the only application that do this kind of operation,
the proper fix would be to make smbfs driver able to hide a file if it
is unlilnked but yet open by some process, and then silently unlink it
when the last process closes it.
Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
At 09:53 13.06.2002 +0200, Kai Krueger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June
12, 2002 10:43 AM
Hi,
I've startet to make the group mapping code modulized in the way it is
done
I am the colleague David reefers to below. I haven't had time
to update Dave on what I learned about this problem.
There is NO problem with Samba.
My problem was caused by the fact that NT mapped drives are not
accessible in exactly the same way by an application launched by
a Remote Shell
I run in user security and use altiris software to send remote
commands to the clients. I ran into this same problem but was
able to solve it by having the remote command to the client be
a batch file that mounted the share and then invoked the netbench
client program. That way the share mount
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 12:26, Cole, Timothy D. wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mike Gerdts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
A similar solution could be used here. The equivalent of the .OLD
directory could be something that is not exported by samba. If an
unlink() fails because of
-Original Message-
From: Mike Gerdts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:03
To: Simo Sorce
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Samba Technical Mailing List
Subject: Re: 2.2.5pre1: unlink design flaw
Under HP-UX 10.20 I ran into issues with automated software
updates
On 13 Jun 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
And samba is not the only application that do this kind of operation,
the proper fix would be to make smbfs driver able to hide a file if it
is unlilnked but yet open by some process, and then silently unlink it
when the last process closes it.
It just
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 19:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The race stay in the fact that you may rename the file and create a link
to an important file between the close and the second unlink, with very
bad results.
On smbfs you cannot create links. Nor on fatfs.
But samba runs on posix
On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 18:07, Urban Widmark wrote:
On 13 Jun 2002, Simo Sorce wrote:
And samba is not the only application that do this kind of operation,
the proper fix would be to make smbfs driver able to hide a file if it
is unlilnked but yet open by some process, and then silently
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 08:28:08PM +0200, Simo Sorce wrote:
I can't remember just now, but can you rename it while open?
Under POSIX, yes.
If you can, then you may rename the file on unlink to a very rare name
and then delete oin close().
This is what NFS does.
I have no idea what
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Don DeVitt wrote:
My problem was caused by the fact that NT mapped drives are not
accessible in exactly the same way by an application launched by
a Remote Shell Daemon as they are from applications that
are launched by the user from the desktop. The authentication is
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Don DeVitt wrote:
My problem was caused by the fact that NT mapped drives are not
accessible in exactly the same way by an application launched by
a Remote Shell Daemon as they are from applications that
are launched by the user from the desktop. The authentication is
Hi,
This patch adds two functions to pdb_get_set.c:
pdb_set_{user,group}_sid_from_string
These functions are useful for pdb backends. Especially since using
pdb_set_user_sid combined with string_to_sid would require allocating
data for a new DOM_SID.
Jelmer
--
Jelmer Vernooij [EMAIL
#define _AA_FDLIST_SIZE 1024
connect function contains ...
extern unsigned char *_pwsFiles;
_pwsFiles = (unsigned char *)malloc(_AA_FDLIST_SIZE);
crashes share ... con't connect
Browseable = No
--Matt
-Original Message-
From: Nieminen, Jooel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:58 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: working with hidden shares 2.2.4
the is no documentation on hidden share ability but adding $-sign to end of
share it hides
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Hi,
After some discussion with idra and metze updated patch to use more
virtualization (use pdb_get_user_sid(sampass) instead of
sampass-private.user_sid).
NO!!!
That function is const, and that is deliberate.
The previous patch was better, but I really would
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Hi,
Here's my latest patch for today :-). This one brings:
- convert lp_passdb_backend() parameter to a list
Looks ok.
- fix bug in sid_copy(), which crashed whenever a NULL pointer was
given as an argument. (sometimes caused errors when user doesn't
have
does anyone know what the following means?? thanx.
-ryan
[2002/06/13 20:08:45, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_responserecordsdb.c:find_response_record(236)
find_response_record: response packet id 15479 received with no matching
record.[2002/06/13 20:08:45, 0]
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Hi,
Here's my latest patch for today :-). This one brings:
- convert lp_passdb_backend() parameter to a list
- fix bug in sid_copy(), which crashed whenever a NULL pointer was
given as an argument. (sometimes caused errors when user doesn't
have access to
In Samba-JP, a following problem was reported.
Since the enum_csc_policy struct doesn't terminate appropriately,
it may occur buffer overflow.
I confirmed this problem using by SWAT.
The csc policy entry includes enum_map_to_guest struct entry.
This problem exists in 2.2.4 and HEAD.
Please
26 matches
Mail list logo
