Hi,
I have Win2k-PL and WinNT-PL users. Samba (print server) is on linux
box.
Security is set to server (another samba set as PDC).
Client login into domain (samba PDC - the same server from which print
server gets passwords). Users are ordinary users - no admins, etc.
Win2k - SP2, WinNT SP6a.
Hi,
Apropos VFS patch shouldn't be
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE instead of -D_LARGEFILE63_SOURCE ?
And another question:
I used VFS to build a antivirus scanner and on close method I need (const
struct files_struct*)-fsp_name which position
depends by this _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE. If one of
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:59:28PM +0300, TUDOR Coserea wrote:
Hi,
Hi, Tudor!
Apropos VFS patch shouldn't be
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE instead of -D_LARGEFILE63_SOURCE ?
There is no such define in new patch. It was, indeed, in old
examples/VFS/block/Makefile but now it is replaced by correct
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Bokovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And another question:
I used VFS to build a antivirus scanner and on close method I
need (const struct files_struct*)-fsp_name which position
depends by this _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE. If one of smbd and my
I've put up the files on Anonymous-FTP on ftp://heineken.dyndns.ws
The files are Snipplets from the beginning of the transaction, covering the timeout,
and ending during normal copying.
verybadperformance1.txt is a brief text-output from etherreal (1.4MB) Frame 0-10018
verybadperformance2.txt
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 02:58:51PM +0300, TUDOR Coserea wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Alexander Bokovoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And another question:
I used VFS to build a antivirus scanner and on close method I
need (const struct files_struct*)-fsp_name which position
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:05:39AM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Just for the record, no one was placing the burden on you andrew
(or even suggesting that it rested upon you). If you don't want to
do it or would rather work on something else, then that's fine.
I think you read too much
Hi,
I am using RedHat 7.3, and when I try to compile 2.2.5 with
--enable-cups it fails with the following message :
-
# tar jxvf samba-2.2.5.tar.bz2
...
# cd samba-2.2.5/source/
# ./configure --enable-cups
...
checking for ssize_t... yes
checking for wchar_t... yes
checking for
Daniel Niasoff schrieb:
When auditing with VFS the pathname recorded is only the relative path for
the share not the the full path all the way from root.
int audit_close(struct files_struct *fsp, int fd)
[..]
fstrcpy(fname, fsp-conn-connectpath);
fstrcat(fname, /);
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 05:07:30PM +0100, Daniel Niasoff wrote:
When auditing with VFS the pathname recorded is only the relative path for
the share not the the full path all the way from root.
Are there any plans to change this as I want to use auditing as a method of
backing up (i:e:
Title: RE: Draft of branch maintainence and release plans
That's the same code I'm talking about. I have it running.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Potter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Esh, Andrew
Cc: Gerald Carter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Hi metze,
on top of the first doc I see you state that all strings should be utf8.
I hearteadly disagree, I woul d rather like to see all internal strings
on new code to be UCS-2.
Utf8 has many disadvantages:
1. require any RPC requests that comes from clients to be converted
forth and back
Hello,
Playing with my smb.conf on a new server (2.2.5), I noticed that the
'security=domain' and 'encrypt passwords=yes' parameters are somewhat
redundant. When commenting out the 'encrypt passwords' line, testparm
gave me the error in the subj. I know some config options (such as
'domain
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 21:32, Michael Sweet wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
Hi metze,
on top of the first doc I see you state that all strings should be utf8.
I hearteadly disagree, I woul d rather like to see all internal strings
on new code to be UCS-2.
Utf8 has many disadvantages:
1.
Simo Sorce wrote:
...
Also, some SMB clients are using UTF-16 now (superset of UCS-2 to
support code points in other Unicode planes) instead of UCS-2.
which clients?
IIRC, MacOS X and Windows XP clients use UTF-16, although unless
you are a Chinese user you will never notice.
...
In
Thanks for your response Kevin . It came just as I was leaving for a
much needed vacation. I hope you are still willing to take a look at
this.
I have done a packet capture. That's how I was able to get as far as I
have. The following is an example of one group-names request and one NT
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:57:02PM -0400, David Collier-Brown wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
Playing with my smb.conf on a new server (2.2.5), I noticed that the
'security=domain' and 'encrypt passwords=yes' parameters are somewhat
redundant.
I owe the team a set of self-check code
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 03:32:50PM -0400, Michael Sweet wrote:
In addition, no matter what Unicode representation is used, you
still have to deal with different representations of the same
character (is it a single character a with an umlat, or a
plus a combining umlat character?, etc.)
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 22:14, Michael Sweet wrote:
To make life even more interesting, case comparisons are a
locale-dependent solution. That is, A with an umlat may
not compare equal to a with an umlat in some locales (or
shouldn't, anyways).
This is not a problem of mine.
Conversion
On Tue, 2002-07-09 at 22:59, Jeremy Allison wrote:
But Simo, I disagree about the internal rep. I think it
needs to be utf8 for Samba internal strings. We already
have to deal with mbcs issues - this doesn't make it any
worse.
Have you thought how difficult is to effectively use utf8
- Original Message -
From: Simo Sorce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Samba Technical [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi metze,
on top of the first doc I see you state that all strings should be utf8.
I hearteadly disagree, I woul d rather like to see all internal
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
HI Andrew,
Andrew Bartlett,Kai Krueger,Jelmer(ctrlsoft)Vernooij and me are designing a
new SAM interface and new a SID mapping System (SMS).
We discussed it on irc.openprojects.net #samba-technical.
Take a look at
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 01:08, Kai Krueger wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Simo Sorce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stefan (metze) Metzmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Samba Technical [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi metze,
on top of the first doc I see you state that all
23 matches
Mail list logo
