On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 07:18:30PM -0300, Marcos Dione wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 11:25:32AM -0600, Steven French wrote:
The creat() system call results (for the Linux kernel) in calls to create
(via vfs_create) then later a call to open (via dentry_open) both of which
eventually end up
Hey there, I posted a quick fix for a problem I found with all samba's up
to 2.2.7a on the general samba list, which describes the following
problem:
In Windows, if you create a file with NORMAL attributes and ALWAYS_CREATE,
close the file and then re-create it with, say, HIDDEN and
Standard Samba 2.2.7 does not rebind to do updates. This is a
problem when using LDAP and a replicated directory.
I did try this on the normal mail-list, but got no responce so I hoped
to try here.
I found http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-2_2-howto.html,
which has a patch to
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
This looks like a good idea - getting this stuff right does matter...
Even more since this db is very hard to recover with Samba onboard
facilities...
I don't like the use of uid_t for gid_t, on the assumption that they
must be the same... I know it will never happen,
On Jan 06, Bryan Henderson wrote:
That's really orthogonal to this discussion. If you want to conserve the
number of VFS operation routines, you can have a single routine with
parameters for a dozen different operations whether it is
lookup-with-intent or lookup-and-do. Pretty much the only
Hello,
I've read the discussion in the list archives regarding the
Solaris fnctl problem which appears to be related to the
lingering problem our site is having since recent migration to
2.2.6 for our print server (Solaris 8, smbd processes hanging
around with high CPU utilization and truss'ed
Hi,
under current CVS samba I've set up a BDC to test some migration
stuff. If I look at it in Network Neighbourhood and view its
properties, it's listed as Windows NT 4.9 Primary. If, however, I look
at it in Server Manager, it's listed as Windows NT 4.9 Backup (which
is what I'd expect, since
On Jan 07, 2003 09:28 -0800, Bryan Henderson wrote:
JFS, VxFS and
NetApp seem to use intent logging to mean something similar (I will
be doing this next, rather than I might be doing this next, but maybe
not). Maybe I misunderstand the intent log, though, and the time at
which it gets
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:00:15PM -0500, Haley, Kevin (K.A.) wrote:
Hello,
I've read the discussion in the list archives regarding the
Solaris fnctl problem which appears to be related to the
lingering problem our site is having since recent migration to
2.2.6 for our print server
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 07:48:30PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this bug being entirely handled by Sun? Or will there be
a samba update as part of the pending fix?
It's a Solaris kernel bug so a Samba update isn't needed.
For which the working patch is currently in testing-mode.
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:53:41AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey there, I posted a quick fix for a problem I found with all samba's up
to 2.2.7a on the general samba list, which describes the following
problem:
In Windows, if you create a file with NORMAL attributes and ALWAYS_CREATE,
I use http://www.kixtart.org/ in login scripts for NT4 Workstations against
Samba servers to do what I think you are talking about. Kixtart does work on
Win95 some maybe this is what you want.
Note that you will need SAMBA 3 for the group stuff to do anything meaningful.
On Tue, 07 Jan 2003
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 02:42:39PM +0930, Barry Robinson wrote:
Not sure if this is the right mailing list to direct this to, but just
wondering if anyone would know of any functionality in using the KXRPC
service through Samba?
Basically you have to install the KXRPC service on a Windows
On Wed, 2003-01-08 at 13:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 10:53:41AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey there, I posted a quick fix for a problem I found with all samba's up
to 2.2.7a on the general samba list, which describes the following
problem:
In Windows, if
14 matches
Mail list logo
