Re: SMB URL

2003-03-25 Thread Michael B. Allen
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:39:26 +0100 Stephan Kulow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I looked into the URL handling libsmbclient is doing and it's lacking quite some of the stuff that the DRAFT specifies (and some of the stuff that generally are required for URIs). Is someone working on that?

Re: Getting notification upon loss of connection (libsmbclient)

2003-03-13 Thread Michael B. Allen
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:07:43 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have not been able to find the block of code that will be called if an open connection receives an indication that the peer has gone away (i.e. shutdown, crashed, cable cut, etc.). More specifically, if I have an open,

Re: [PATCH] file change notification

2003-03-04 Thread Michael B. Allen
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:03:02 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Hasch) wrote: Hi, attached is a modified version of Hal's file change notification patch. It's against Samba HEAD and works for me. Changes: - use push_ucs2() to send unicode file names - make some functions static (make proto

Re: SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO not correct in SNIA spec?

2003-02-18 Thread Michael B. Allen
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:30:44 -0800 (PST) Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Joey Collins wrote: The SNIA definition of the data required for SMB_QUERY_FILE_ALL_INFO does not appear to be correct. Furthermore, Ethereal's interpretation does not seem right,

Re: interesting fact about StrCaseCmp

2003-02-17 Thread Michael B. Allen
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:35:32 +1100 Martin Pool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Possibly only for long strings? But then that is probably micro-optimization. If we really cared about optimizing this function, then we would compare

Re: Well, the large file offset stuff in smbclient seems to work

2003-02-15 Thread Michael B. Allen
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 21:26:16 -0500 John E. Malmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael B. Allen wrote: Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just reporting that the large file offset code in smbclient and libsmb now seems to work. I have been chasing a weird problem with 20+ second

Re: Well, the large file offset stuff in smbclient seems to work

2003-02-15 Thread Michael B. Allen
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 23:04:29 -0500 John E. Malmberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael B. Allen wrote: No. Strange effects can happen at many different file sizes. If you do not test it, you do not know that it works. Can you give me a specific example? I've written a client and I

Re: Winbindd limited by select

2003-02-12 Thread Michael B. Allen
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:36:19 -0500 Ken Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've run into a problem with winbindd in both 2.2.x and 3.0 where it just locks up after a while on large, busy networks. We finally tracked down the problem to the fact that the C library select function is limited by

Re: Ignoring printer errors

2003-02-11 Thread Michael B. Allen
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:44:00 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't change the printing code. You'll regret it :-) :-). I was also thinking this morning in the shower of moving the error returns to full NTSTATUS for all printing returns... That would make me want to take a shower too. Mike --

NBT length parameter larger than necessary in session request

2003-01-31 Thread Michael B. Allen
Hi guys, Ever notice smbclient sends an NBT session request with an NBT length field that is 4 bytes longer than necessary? No harm, but is there a reason for this? I'm using 2.2.1a shipped with RH connecting to the same version of Samba over loopback. Mike -- A program should be written to

Re: Win2K: Primary Domain Fld of Ssn Setup Not Properly Zero Term'd

2002-08-26 Thread Michael B. Allen
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:24:09 + Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Aug 25, 2002 at 10:02:49PM -0400, Allen, Michael B (RSCH) wrote: Clients should not check for *two* zero bytes after the Primary Domain field Unicode string in SMB_COM_SESSION_SETUP_ANDX. You

Re: SNIA CIFS TR

2002-07-31 Thread Michael B . Allen
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:24:48 +1000 Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wish someone would do a real analysis and write some practical documentation. A volenteer! Great! I'll see what help I can be, but you might want to This is such a crappy argument. I file this one

Re: SNIA CIFS TR

2002-07-30 Thread Michael B . Allen
Don't you think it's kind of funny that Leach and Naik aren't even mentioned in the acknowledgements? And they put a Copyright 2001, 2002 SNIA in there? This document is a big turd. There are major grammatical errors, technical inaccuracies, and huge holes that aren't even mentioned