Hi
Here comes the next part of the access control patch.
It fixes the nt_user_token in the pipes_struct and should therefore make the
whole patch function correctly so that it probably could then be applied.
Till now the current_user struct in pipes_struct was only initialised in the
code for
From: Tim Potter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 09:01:45PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
Secondly, I have some further style nit-picks:
- We can't use \\ as a comment in Samba, as many C compilers don't
understand it.
It's actually not ANSI C!
Another one I found
This is the first version of the patch to implement access control to SAM.
It implements checks of the desired access in all open functions (those that create
handles)
against the appropriate default SDs of the previous patch and associates the granted
access bits
with the handle. These
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 07:51:53PM +0200, Kai Krueger wrote:
This is the first version of the patch to implement access control to SAM.
It implements checks of the desired access in all open functions (those that create
handles)
against the appropriate default SDs of the previous patch and
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Allison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: Access control to SAM / _samr_query_sec_obj
Nice patch. I do have one request though. I've (for years)
been removing magic numerical constants from Samba (like
Hi,
currently, as far as I can see, the access control to the SAM database is
only based upon file access to the db-files. On normal installations
therefore only the root user can change, delete or add things instead of the
entire administrators group. As this is IMHO rather unhelpfull,
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 12:17:19AM +0200, Kai Krueger wrote:
currently, as far as I can see, the access control to the SAM database is
only based upon file access to the db-files. On normal installations
therefore only the root user can change, delete or add things instead of the
entire
