RE: Annoying Minor Bug In Winbind 2.2.x

2003-02-19 Thread Boyce, Nick
On 19 Feb 2003, Andrew Esh wrote: It's probably a line count thing. The head of the patch contains a certain range of lines that the patch should apply to. If you truncated the patch at the bottom, the header could be telling patch it needs to add, for example, 30 lines, while the patch text

RE: Annoying Minor Bug In Winbind 2.2.x

2003-02-18 Thread Esh, Andrew
with the plus signs, match what is already in the target file. -Original Message- From: Boyce, Nick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 2:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Martin Pool' Subject: RE: Annoying Minor Bug In Winbind 2.2.x On 18 Feb 2003, Martin

Re: Annoying Minor Bug In Winbind 2.2.x

2003-02-18 Thread 'Martin Pool'
On 18 Feb 2003, Boyce, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sorry - I'm probably doing something dumb, but I still get failures even with this patch - first, if I save the patch as it appeared in my Outlook window, then line 25 consists of a single left brace char, which results in : You can

Re: Annoying Minor Bug In Winbind 2.2.x

2003-02-17 Thread 'Martin Pool'
On 17 Feb 2003, Boyce, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK - I've been trying to apply the patch that Tim posted (to supersede Martin's first cut) to the Samba 2.2.7a source file for util_sock.c, but get errors applying the patch no matter what I do. Thanks for trying that. I guess the posted

Re: Annoying Minor Bug In Winbind 2.2.x

2003-02-17 Thread 'Martin Pool'
On 17 Feb 2003, Boyce, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's what I get if I apply the posted patch : As I said I'll send you an update just for 2.2. But in general, in case you're interested, here are some tips on applying mismatched patches: MYBOX:/usr/local/src/samba-2.2.7a/source/lib#

RE: Annoying Minor Bug In Winbind 2.2.x

2003-02-07 Thread Boyce, Nick
On 7 Feb 2003, Martin Pool wrote: On 6 Feb 2003, Boyce, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I find what seems to be an obvious, simple and annoying buggette - if I stop and restart winbind (the sort of thing you do a lot at this stage) then it fails to restart, with this message in

Re: Annoying Minor Bug In Winbind 2.2.x

2003-02-07 Thread Martin Pool
On 7 Feb 2003, Boyce, Nick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks - that was it. I now have a script /usr/local/bin/winbind, which does umask 000 /etc/init.d/winbind $1 umask 027 and everything is working ok now - I can stop restart winbind to my heart's content without any problem

Annoying Minor Bug In Winbind 2.2.x

2003-02-06 Thread Boyce, Nick
As per my message an hour or so ago, I'm trying to get the winbind that comes with Debian 3.0 Samba 2.2.3a-12 configured to allow me to telnet into the box with authentication handed off to a real NT domain. Anyway, even before I really get started, I find what seems to be an obvious, simple and

Re: Annoying Minor Bug In Winbind 2.2.x

2003-02-06 Thread Tim Potter
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:23:30PM +1100, Martin Pool wrote: The bug apparently came in Andrew Bartlett's merge in 1.45; the provenance of it I don't know. (TNG?) This patch ought to be applied to 2.2, HEAD, 3.0, and APPL_HEAD. Tim, how's this patch? How about this - I've collapsed the