On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 21:35, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
My idea was this:
let make it so taht if unix extensions are enabled, then we NEVER
resolve the links if we permit link creation.
If we do not want to have it so rigid, we may
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
My idea was this:
let make it so taht if unix extensions are enabled, then we NEVER
resolve the links if we permit link creation.
So if unix extensions are true, then all opens set O_NOFOLLOW.
Ok if O_NOFOLLOW is defined and exists in
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 18:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
My idea was this:
let make it so taht if unix extensions are enabled, then we NEVER
resolve the links if we permit link creation.
So if unix extensions are true, then all
My idea was this:
let make it so taht if unix extensions are enabled, then we NEVER
resolve the links if we permit link creation.
If we do not want to have it so rigid, we may also add a proper option,
something like wide unix symlinks with all the proper warnings and
normally disabled. Then if
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
My idea was this:
let make it so taht if unix extensions are enabled, then we NEVER
resolve the links if we permit link creation.
If we do not want to have it so rigid, we may also add a proper option,
something like wide unix
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 10:36:33AM +0100, Simo Sorce wrote:
Jeremy, in case of unix extensions, shouldn't we pass the symlink
as is and not resolve it?
Yes we do - if the client uses the UNIX extensions to readlink. The
problem is a UNIX extension client could set a
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 03:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I have some problems with this patch. It allows a
client to add a symlink to a Samba share which points to
a file elsewhere on the server disk. For example :
create a symlink from /home/myhome/p - /etc/passwd.
Now as Samba
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 20:36, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2002-12-31 at 03:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I have some problems with this patch. It allows a
client to add a symlink to a Samba share which points to
a file elsewhere on the server disk. For example :
create a symlink
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 07:09:43PM +1100, John Newbigin wrote:
If no one has any problems with this patch, can it be applied?
John.
Original Message
Subject: Patch for unix extensions
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 09:51:39 +1100
From: John Newbigin [EMAIL PROTECTED
If no one has any problems with this patch, can it be applied?
John.
Original Message
Subject: Patch for unix extensions
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 09:51:39 +1100
From: John Newbigin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a small patch which added a new config option
This is a small patch which added a new config option to turn the
ensure_link_is_safe check off.
The link check for symlinks also incorrectly parses relative target paths
as relative to the root of the share name rather than relative to the
directory containing the symbolic link file.So a
11 matches
Mail list logo
