On April 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm looking for some assistance regarding file permissions and the inability
to stop the execution of a file even though the execute permission has not
been set.
Execute bits are a Unix concept. Windows will execute any file it can
read that it understands
Nick,
Perhaps you can explain how you would achieve your goals if the server was
running Windows 2000 Server. If you can demonstrate a pure Windows
solution maybe we could match that with Samba.
- John T.
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Nick Drouet wrote:
I'm looking for some assistance regarding file
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Ronan Waide wrote:
On April 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm looking for some assistance regarding file permissions and the inability
to stop the execution of a file even though the execute permission has not
been set.
Execute bits are a Unix concept. Windows will
On April 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hmmm, I did some testing a week or so ago, and found that removing the
execute permission from ACLs on the file (esp inherited ones) prevents
Win2K from executing the file, although it does open the file for read
first.
Yep, turns out I opened my mouth
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Jim McDonough wrote:
Hmmm, I did some testing a week or so ago, and found that removing the
execute permission from ACLs on the file (esp inherited ones) prevents
Win2K from executing the file, although it does open the file for read
first.
Doesn't happen for me. It lets
: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:23 AM
To: Richard Sharpe
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nick Drouet
Subject: Re: Users able to execute windows .exe though execute bit not
set
On April 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hmmm, I did some testing a week or so ago, and found that removing the
execute permission
: Users able to execute windows .exe though execute bit not
set
Perhaps you can explain how you would achieve your goals if the server was
running Windows 2000 Server. If you can demonstrate a pure Windows
solution maybe we could match that with Samba.
John, I've checked it out and this is a real
What is Windows is using to determine that it needs to do the
executability test? There is no executable bit in Windows. There is the
ACL entry, but nothing at the DOS level. That is, unless they are testing
the file extension.
It uses the ACL. It follows locally what's in the ACL, and the
-Original Message-
From: Jim McDonough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The unix x bit is a perfectly
reasonable place to
store this, and unix has the same problems windows does...if
you can read
it, you can copy it and change the bits in your own copy.
Isn't the UNIX x bit already
To: 'Jim McDonough'; Esh, Andrew
Cc: John H Terpstra; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nick Drouet;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Users able to execute windows .exe though execute bit not
set
-Original Message-
From: Jim McDonough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The unix x bit is a perfectly
10 matches
Mail list logo
