On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 05:05:35PM +0100, David Lee wrote:
[...]
Now... we are contemplating a migration to Active Directory (AD) of
these accounts: some 20,000 or them. (Gives me, as a UNIX person, the
shudders, but that's another story...!)
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:25:42AM +0100, David Lee wrote:
But the Windows/PC folk were worried (and I think I share this) about the
ability of AD to interwork (be implemented by?) third party LDAP/Kerberos.
In *theory*, AD is supposed to be compliant with LDAP and Kerberos, isn't
it? But we
I've been reading about setting up Samba as a PDC with LDAP storage.
However if I am to do this it needs to co-exist with the exisitng windows
NT domain using windows NT PDC's. Everything I've read so far says you
can't have a Samba BDC unless it's in a Samba PDC controlled domain. Is this
hello paul,
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:00:08PM +0100, Paul Reilly wrote:
I've been reading about setting up Samba as a PDC with LDAP storage.
However if I am to do this it needs to co-exist with the exisitng windows
NT domain using windows NT PDC's. Everything I've read so far says you
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 04:00:08PM +0100, Paul Reilly wrote:
I've been reading about setting up Samba as a PDC with LDAP storage.
However if I am to do this it needs to co-exist with the exisitng windows
NT domain using windows NT PDC's. Everything I've read so far says you
can't have a Samba
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Paul Reilly wrote:
I've been reading about setting up Samba as a PDC with LDAP storage.
However if I am to do this it needs to co-exist with the exisitng windows
NT domain using windows NT PDC's. Everything I've read so far says you
can't have a Samba BDC unless it's in
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 05:05:35PM +0100, David Lee wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, Paul Reilly wrote:
I've been reading about setting up Samba as a PDC with LDAP storage.
However if I am to do this it needs to co-exist with the exisitng windows
NT domain using windows NT PDC's. Everything
