On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 04:15:52PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
No, not really. The \$ in the name of the trust account is an MS thing.
Samba requires a machine account be backed up on the server with
Since samba 2.2.8 seems to be on the way i thought i might raise this
issue before release.
I've seen a few users get confused by the fact that their machine name
and their user name cannot be very similar
adil (users) and
adil$ (machine)
cannot work.
I think it's not good practice to have
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 09:04:14AM -0500, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
Since samba 2.2.8 seems to be on the way i thought i might raise this
issue before release.
I've seen a few users get confused by the fact that their machine name
and their user name cannot be very similar
adil (users)
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 01:04, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
Since samba 2.2.8 seems to be on the way i thought i might raise this
issue before release.
I've seen a few users get confused by the fact that their machine name
and their user name cannot be very similar
adil (users) and
adil$
Quoting Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why can't it work? I've seen this discussed a number of times, but
never really been told why it doesn't work. That $ is there for
exactly that reason you know - to make them different.
Er, not exactly. If I remember correctly, the $ in the
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 07:54, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
Quoting Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why can't it work? I've seen this discussed a number of times, but
never really been told why it doesn't work. That $ is there for
exactly that reason you know - to make them different.
Quoting Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
These are different. The $ termination is a NT suffix, that NT adds
to it's machine accounts. The netbios issues are separate. (And as any
user may add a netbios name to the network, Samba really isn't in a
position to prevent this from
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 15:39, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
adil (users) and
adil$ (machine)
cannot work.
Why can't it work? I've seen this discussed a number of times, but
never really been told why it doesn't work. That $ is there for exactly
that reason you know - to make them different.
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
Quoting Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why can't it work? I've seen this discussed a number of times, but
never really been told why it doesn't work. That $ is there for
exactly that reason you know - to make them different.
Er, not
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 17:28, Richard Sharpe wrote:
When a workstation boots, it registers its workstation name as a NetBIOS
name. Indeed, it registers several types of NetBIOS names, including a
00 name, a 03 name and, if you have enabled sharing, a 20 name.
When a user tries to log on,
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 15:39, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
adil (users) and
adil$ (machine)
cannot work.
Why can't it work? I've seen this discussed a number of times, but
never really been told why it doesn't work. That $ is there for
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:47:47PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 15:39, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
adil (users) and
adil$ (machine)
cannot work.
Why can't it work? I've seen this discussed a number of times,
Quoting Richard Sharpe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, not really. The \$ in the name of the trust account is an MS thing.
Samba requires a machine account be backed up on the server with an
account of that name. However, as far as I can see, we could remove that
restriction, as we could keep all the
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 17:47, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 15:39, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
adil (users) and
adil$ (machine)
cannot work.
Why can't it work? I've seen this discussed a number of times, but
never
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
Quoting Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why can't it work? I've seen this discussed a number of times, but
never really been told why it doesn't work. That $ is there for
exactly that reason
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:47:47PM -0800, Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Bradley W. Langhorst wrote:
On Thu, 2003-02-06 at 15:39, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
adil (users) and
adil$ (machine)
cannot work.
Why can't
16 matches
Mail list logo
